Speech Outcomes Comparison Between Adult Velopharyngeal Insufficiency and Patients With Unrepaired Cleft Palate.

OBJECTIVE

This study compared the speech outcomes of adult velopharyngeal insufficiency patients and adult cleft palate (ACP) patients, and explored whether there was any difference in the phonological level of these 2 types of patients.

METHODS

Perceptual evaluation was used to assess speech intelligibility, hypernasality and compensatory articulation in 89 adult patients with velopharyngeal insufficiency and 35 adult patients with unrepaired cleft palate. Each group was divided into complete cleft palate and incomplete cleft palate (including submucous cleft palate). The phonological differences were compared between the 2 groups of patients and 2 types of cleft palate.

RESULTS

The mean speech intelligibility was 43.04% in velopharyngeal insufficiency group and 32.87% in ACP group. There was a significant difference in speech intelligibility between the 2 groups by T test, t = 2.916 (P < 0.01), speech intelligibility between 2 types of cleft palate was no significant difference. Also, there was a significant difference between the 2 groups in the constitution of hypernasality degree by Chi-Square test, x2 = 31.650 (P < 0.01), compensatory articulation were present in 74.3% ACP patients (26/35) and 47.2% velopharyngeal insufficiency patients (42/89), x2 = 7.446 (P < 0.01), there was a significant difference in incidence of compensatory articulation between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Adult patients with unpaired cleft palate present an even worse speech intelligibility and hypernasality degree than velopharyngeal insufficiency patients after cleft palate repair, regardless of the cleft type. Additionally, patients in ACP group have a higher incidence of compensatory articulation than that in incomplete cleft palate group. In sequenced treatments of cleft lip and palate, evaluation and treatment of speech disorders cannot be ignored.