• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

实施狼疮决策辅助工具(IDEAL):一项采用观察性案例研究设计的多中心实施试验的研究方案:实施狼疮决策辅助工具

Implementing the DEcision-Aid for Lupus (IDEAL): study protocol of a multi-site implementation trial with observational, case study design : Implementing the DEcision-Aid for Lupus.

作者信息

Singh Jasvinder A, Hearld Larry R, Hall Allyson G, Beasley T Mark

机构信息

Medicine Service, VA Medical Center, 700 19th St S, AL, Birmingham, 35233, USA.

Department of Medicine at School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1720 Second Ave South, Birmingham, AL, 35294-0022, USA.

出版信息

Implement Sci Commun. 2021 Mar 11;2(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s43058-021-00118-9.

DOI:10.1186/s43058-021-00118-9
PMID:33706813
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7951119/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To provide the details of the study protocol for an observational, case study design, implementation trial.

METHODS

Implementing the DEcision-Aid for Lupus (IDEAL) study will put into practice a shared decision-making (SDM) strategy, using an individualized, culturally appropriate computerized decision-aid (DA) for lupus patients in 15 geographically diverse clinics in the USA. The overarching frameworks that guide this implementation study are the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and Powell's typology of implementation strategies. All 15 clinics will receive standardized capacity-building activities for lupus DA implementation in the clinic, including education, training, technical assistance, re-training, and incorporation of a clinic champion in the core team of each site. In addition, clinics will also choose among clinic-targeted activities to integrate the DA into existing work processes and/or patient-targeted activities to raise awareness and educate patients about the DA. These activities will be chosen to stimulate participant recruitment and retention activities that support the implementation of the DA at their clinic. In study aim 1, using surveys and semi-structured interviews with clinic personnel in 15 lupus clinics, we will assess stakeholder needs and identify clinic and contextual characteristics that inform the implementation strategy component selection and influence implementation effectiveness. Study aim 2 is to implement and assess the effectiveness of the IDEAL (standardized and tailored) strategy in 15 lupus clinics by examining the changes in our primary outcome of penetration, i.e., the proportion of all eligible patients in the clinic that receive the lupus DA, and secondary outcomes include DA appropriateness, acceptability, success, permanence, and feasibility. Study aim 3 is to identify ways to sustain and disseminate our lupus DA via semi-structured debriefing interviews with key clinic personnel and patients.

DISCUSSION

The study will enroll at least 500 patient participants with lupus across all 15 sites and assess the effectiveness in implementing the DA in various clinic settings across the USA.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03735238 . Protocol version number: 15, date 6/8/2020.

摘要

目的

为一项观察性病例研究设计的实施试验提供研究方案的详细信息。

方法

实施狼疮决策辅助工具(IDEAL)研究将把一种共享决策(SDM)策略付诸实践,在美国15个地理位置各异的诊所中,为狼疮患者使用个性化的、符合文化背景的计算机化决策辅助工具(DA)。指导这项实施研究的总体框架是实施研究综合框架(CFIR)和鲍威尔的实施策略类型学。所有15个诊所都将接受针对狼疮DA在诊所实施的标准化能力建设活动,包括教育、培训、技术援助、再培训,并在每个站点的核心团队中纳入一名诊所倡导者。此外,诊所还将在针对诊所的活动中进行选择,以将DA整合到现有工作流程中,和/或选择针对患者的活动,以提高对DA的认识并对患者进行相关教育。选择这些活动是为了促进参与者招募和留存活动,以支持在其诊所实施DA。在研究目标1中,通过对15个狼疮诊所的诊所工作人员进行调查和半结构化访谈,我们将评估利益相关者的需求,并确定影响实施策略组成部分选择和实施效果的诊所及背景特征。研究目标2是通过检查我们的主要结局指标渗透率(即诊所中所有符合条件的患者接受狼疮DA的比例)的变化,在15个狼疮诊所实施并评估IDEAL(标准化和量身定制)策略的有效性,次要结局指标包括DA的适宜性、可接受性、成功率、持久性和可行性。研究目标3是通过与关键诊所工作人员和患者进行半结构化汇报访谈,确定维持和推广我们的狼疮DA的方法。

讨论

该研究将在所有15个站点招募至少500名狼疮患者参与者,并评估在美国各地不同诊所环境中实施DA的有效性。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov,NCT03735238。方案版本号:15,日期2020年8月6日。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c586/7953796/cb7ac6fa9963/43058_2021_118_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c586/7953796/4da597f6d07c/43058_2021_118_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c586/7953796/cb7ac6fa9963/43058_2021_118_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c586/7953796/4da597f6d07c/43058_2021_118_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c586/7953796/cb7ac6fa9963/43058_2021_118_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Implementing the DEcision-Aid for Lupus (IDEAL): study protocol of a multi-site implementation trial with observational, case study design : Implementing the DEcision-Aid for Lupus.实施狼疮决策辅助工具(IDEAL):一项采用观察性案例研究设计的多中心实施试验的研究方案:实施狼疮决策辅助工具
Implement Sci Commun. 2021 Mar 11;2(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s43058-021-00118-9.
2
Factors influencing implementation of a computerized, individualized, culturally tailored lupus decision aid in lupus clinics: a qualitative semi-structured interview study.影响狼疮诊所中使用计算机化、个体化、文化适应的狼疮决策辅助工具的因素:一项定性半结构式访谈研究。
Clin Rheumatol. 2019 Oct;38(10):2793-2801. doi: 10.1007/s10067-019-04643-w. Epub 2019 Jun 20.
3
Evaluation of a program for routine implementation of shared decision-making in cancer care: study protocol of a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial.评估癌症护理中常规实施共享决策的方案:一项阶梯式楔形集群随机试验的研究方案。
Implement Sci. 2018 Mar 27;13(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0740-y.
4
Clinic personnel attitudes and baseline implementation outcomes of a lupus decision aid.狼疮决策辅助工具的临床人员态度和基线实施结果。
Psychol Health Med. 2024 Dec;29(10):1835-1847. doi: 10.1080/13548506.2024.2407448. Epub 2024 Oct 15.
5
Qualitative evaluation of the Systems Analysis and Improvement Approach as a strategy to increase HIV testing in family planning clinics using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research and the Implementation Outcomes Framework.使用实施研究综合框架和实施结果框架,对系统分析与改进方法作为增加计划生育诊所艾滋病毒检测策略的定性评估。
Implement Sci Commun. 2022 Sep 8;3(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s43058-022-00342-x.
6
Development of a Decision Aid for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Involving Intensive Care Unit Patients' and Health Professionals' Participation Using User-Centered Design and a Wiki Platform for Rapid Prototyping: A Research Protocol.一项使用以用户为中心的设计和维基平台进行快速原型制作的、涉及重症监护病房患者及医护人员参与的心肺复苏决策辅助工具的开发:一项研究方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2016 Feb 11;5(1):e24. doi: 10.2196/resprot.5107.
7
A Web-Based Decision Aid (myAID) to Enhance Quality of Life, Empowerment, Decision Making, and Disease Control for Patients With Ulcerative Colitis: Protocol for a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.一种基于网络的决策辅助工具(myAID),用于提高溃疡性结肠炎患者的生活质量、增强自我效能、改善决策制定及疾病控制:一项整群随机对照试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2020 Jul 10;9(7):e15994. doi: 10.2196/15994.
8
Investigation of factors influencing the implementation of two shared decision-making interventions in contraceptive care: a qualitative interview study among clinical and administrative staff.调查影响避孕护理中两种共享决策干预措施实施的因素:一项针对临床和行政人员的定性访谈研究。
Implement Sci. 2019 Nov 9;14(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s13012-019-0941-z.
9
Association between the number of adopted implementation strategies and contextual determinants: a mixed-methods study.采用的实施策略数量与情境决定因素之间的关联:一项混合方法研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Dec 13;22(1):1518. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08736-2.
10
Integrating shared decision-making into primary care: lessons learned from a multi-centre feasibility randomized controlled trial.将共享决策纳入初级保健:一项多中心可行性随机对照试验的经验教训。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 Nov 22;21(1):323. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01673-w.

引用本文的文献

1
Organizational Climate and Decision Aid Sustainability in Lupus Care: Mixed Methods Study.狼疮护理中的组织氛围与决策辅助工具的可持续性:混合方法研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Aug 21;9:e69603. doi: 10.2196/69603.
2
Implementation outcomes of a patient decision-aid in a diverse population with systemic lupus erythematosus in 15 US rheumatology clinics.美国15家风湿病诊所中,针对患有系统性红斑狼疮的不同人群的患者决策辅助工具的实施效果。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2025 Aug 1;64(8):4631-4640. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keaf205.
3
Time required to implement a computerized patient decision aid for lupus in outpatient visits.

本文引用的文献

1
Individualized decision aid for diverse women with lupus nephritis (IDEA-WON): A randomized controlled trial.个体化决策辅助工具在狼疮肾炎(IDEA-WON)中的应用:一项随机对照试验。
PLoS Med. 2019 May 8;16(5):e1002800. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002800. eCollection 2019 May.
2
Choosing implementation strategies to address contextual barriers: diversity in recommendations and future directions.选择实施策略以解决背景障碍:建议的多样性和未来方向。
Implement Sci. 2019 Apr 29;14(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s13012-019-0892-4.
3
Psychometric assessment of three newly developed implementation outcome measures.
在门诊就诊中实施狼疮患者计算机决策辅助工具所需的时间。
Implement Sci Commun. 2025 Apr 10;6(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s43058-025-00727-8.
4
A Bitter Pill to Swallow: The Challenge of Medication Nonadherence in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.难以下咽的苦药:系统性红斑狼疮患者药物治疗依从性面临的挑战
J Rheumatol. 2024 Sep 1;51(9):841-844. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.2024-0654.
5
Association between the number of adopted implementation strategies and contextual determinants: a mixed-methods study.采用的实施策略数量与情境决定因素之间的关联:一项混合方法研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Dec 13;22(1):1518. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08736-2.
三种新开发的实施结果测量工具的心理计量学评估。
Implement Sci. 2017 Aug 29;12(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0635-3.
4
Individualized patient decision-aid for immunosuppressive drugs in women with lupus nephritis: study protocol of a randomized, controlled trial.狼疮性肾炎女性免疫抑制药物个体化患者决策辅助工具:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Jan 31;18(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1408-5.
5
Risk of serious infections with immunosuppressive drugs and glucocorticoids for lupus nephritis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.免疫抑制药物和糖皮质激素治疗狼疮性肾炎时发生严重感染的风险:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
BMC Med. 2016 Sep 13;14(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s12916-016-0673-8.
6
Comparative effectiveness of immunosuppressive drugs and corticosteroids for lupus nephritis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.免疫抑制药物和皮质类固醇治疗狼疮性肾炎的比较疗效:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析。
Syst Rev. 2016 Sep 13;5(1):155. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0328-z.
7
Treatments for Lupus Nephritis: A Systematic Review and Network Metaanalysis.狼疮性肾炎的治疗:一项系统评价与网状Meta分析
J Rheumatol. 2016 Oct;43(10):1801-1815. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.160041. Epub 2016 Sep 1.
8
Mapping Perceptions of Lupus Medication Decision-Making Facilitators: The Importance of Patient Context.绘制狼疮药物决策促进因素的认知图:患者背景的重要性。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2016 Dec;68(12):1787-1794. doi: 10.1002/acr.22904.
9
Minorities with lupus nephritis and medications: a study of facilitators to medication decision-making.患有狼疮性肾炎的少数族裔与药物治疗:药物决策促进因素的研究
Arthritis Res Ther. 2015 Dec 17;17:367. doi: 10.1186/s13075-015-0883-z.
10
Barriers to Medication Decision Making in Women with Lupus Nephritis: A Formative Study using Nominal Group Technique.狼疮性肾炎女性药物治疗决策的障碍:一项使用名义小组技术的形成性研究。
J Rheumatol. 2015 Sep;42(9):1616-23. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.150168. Epub 2015 Jul 15.