Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Am J Cardiol. 2021 Apr 1;144 Suppl 1:S23-S31. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.12.020.
Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), the combination of aspirin (ASA), and a P2Y inhibitor, protects against stent thrombosis and new atherothrombotic events after a stent implantation or an acute coronary syndrome, but exposes patients to an increased risk of bleeding. In most current practices, the P2Y inhibitor is stopped at 6 to 12 months and ASA is continued indefinitely. The advent of safer stents, with less risk of stent thrombosis, has challenged this standard of care, however. A number of alternative strategies involving earlier de-escalation of the antiplatelet therapy have therefore been proposed. In these approaches, standard DAPT is switched to a less potent antithrombotic combination at an earlier time-point than recommended by guidelines. Three different de-escalation variations have been tested to date. The first one maintains DAPT but switches from the potent P2Y inhibitors ticagrelor or prasugrel to either a lower dose or to clopidogrel, while maintaining ASA. The 2 other approaches involve changing DAPT to a single antiplatelet at some earlier time-point after the percutaneous coronary intervention procedure, by stopping either the P2Y inhibitor or ASA. These strategies have all demonstrated some benefit in clinical trials so far, but especially the contribution of ASA in secondary prevention is clearly evolving as its role in increasing bleeding complications while not providing increased ischemic benefit is becoming more and more clear. In contemporary practice, the type and duration of DAPT should now be based on an individualized decision, and the de-escalation strategies, if used wisely, can be added to the existing options.
双联抗血小板治疗(DAPT),即阿司匹林(ASA)和 P2Y 抑制剂的联合应用,可预防支架置入后或急性冠脉综合征后的支架血栓形成和新的动脉粥样硬化血栓事件,但会使患者出血风险增加。在大多数当前的实践中,P2Y 抑制剂在 6 至 12 个月时停止使用,而 ASA 则无限期使用。然而,更安全的支架的出现,其支架血栓形成的风险较低,对这一护理标准提出了挑战。因此,提出了许多涉及更早减少抗血小板治疗的替代策略。在这些方法中,标准的 DAPT 在比指南推荐的更早的时间点转换为一种效力较弱的抗血栓形成联合治疗。迄今为止,已经测试了三种不同的减量化变异性。第一种方法是维持 DAPT,但将强效的 P2Y 抑制剂替格瑞洛或普拉格雷换用低剂量或氯吡格雷,同时维持 ASA。另外两种方法涉及在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗程序后的某个较早时间点将 DAPT 改为单一抗血小板药物,即停止使用 P2Y 抑制剂或 ASA。迄今为止,这些策略在临床试验中都显示出了一些益处,但尤其 ASA 在二级预防中的作用正在发生变化,因为它增加出血并发症的作用而没有提供更多的缺血益处变得越来越明显。在当代实践中,DAPT 的类型和持续时间现在应该基于个体化决策,并且如果明智地使用,减量化策略可以作为现有选择的补充。