Suppr超能文献

一种新型自组装肽作为内镜黏膜下剥离术中新型黏膜下注射溶液。

A novel self-assembling peptide as new submucosal injection solution in endoscopic submucosal dissection.

作者信息

Okimoto Kenichiro, Matsumura Tomoaki, Ishikawa Tsubasa, Mukai Shohei, Takahashi Satsuki, Horio Ryosuke, Goto Chihiro, Kurosugi Akane, Sonoda Michiko, Kaneko Tatsuya, Ohta Yuki, Taida Takashi, Matsusaka Keisuke, Kato Jun, Ikeda Jun-Ichiro, Kato Naoya

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Inohana 1-8-1, Chiba, 260-8670, Japan.

Department of Pathology, Chiba University Hospital, Chiba, Japan.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2025 May;39(5):2949-2957. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11655-y. Epub 2025 Mar 20.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study evaluates the effectiveness of PuraLift, a novel self-assembling peptide-based submucosal injection solution, in endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) procedures. We compared its performance to MucoUp in a variety of organ-spanning lesions (esophagus, stomach, and colon/rectum).

METHODS

We included 40 consecutive ESD lesions from our hospital, with 19 treated using PuraLift and 21 using MucoUp. Special cases (such as those with ulcerative colitis, evident fibrosis due to post-treatment scars, and circumferential esophageal cases) and the cases that used device without waterjet function were excluded. Endoscopists assessed the satisfaction of submucosal lifting through needle injection on a 5-point scale. Firmness during local injection by the assistant for the PuraLift group was compared to MucoUp (MucoUp was set as a baseline score of 3) using a 5-point scale.

RESULTS

The firmness during local injection was significantly lower with PuraLift compared to MucoUp across all locations: esophagus (1 (1-2) vs. 3 (3-3), p = 0.018), stomach (1.5 (1-2) vs. 3 (3-3), p < 0.001), and colon/rectum (2 (1-2) vs. 3 (3-3), p < 0.001). However, there were no significant differences between PuraLift and MucoUp in terms of endoscopist satisfaction with lifting, amount of solution injected, glycerol used via jet function, or procedure time for any organ.

CONCLUSION

PuraLift, with its novel mechanism, offers comparable lifting satisfaction to MucoUp but with less firmness during injection. It presents a promising alternative as a local injection solution in ESD procedures.

摘要

背景

本研究评估了一种新型的基于自组装肽的黏膜下注射溶液PuraLift在内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)中的有效性。我们将其在各种跨器官病变(食管、胃和结肠/直肠)中的表现与MucoUp进行了比较。

方法

我们纳入了本院连续的40例ESD病变,其中19例使用PuraLift治疗,21例使用MucoUp治疗。排除特殊病例(如溃疡性结肠炎患者、治疗后瘢痕导致明显纤维化的患者以及食管周向病变患者)和使用无水刀功能设备的病例。内镜医师通过针注射以5分制评估黏膜下抬举的满意度。使用5分制将PuraLift组助手局部注射时的硬度与MucoUp进行比较(将MucoUp的基线分数设定为3)。

结果

在所有部位,PuraLift局部注射时的硬度均显著低于MucoUp:食管(1(1 - 2)对3(3 - 3),p = 0.018)、胃(1.5(1 - 2)对3(3 - 3),p < 0.001)和结肠/直肠(2(1 - 2)对3(3 - 3),p < 0.001)。然而,在任何器官的内镜医师对抬举的满意度、注射溶液量、通过水刀功能使用的甘油量或手术时间方面,PuraLift与MucoUp之间均无显著差异。

结论

PuraLift具有新颖的作用机制,在抬举满意度方面与MucoUp相当,但注射时硬度较低。它作为ESD手术中的局部注射溶液是一种有前景的替代方案。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8321/12040996/8e49c4a2172b/464_2025_11655_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验