School of Human Sciences (Exercise and Sports Science), The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia.
Faculty of Education, National University of Malaysia, Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia.
J Sports Sci Med. 2021 Mar 1;20(1):69-76. doi: 10.52082/jssm.2021.69. eCollection 2021 Mar.
This study investigated the effectiveness of head cooling on cognitive performance after 30 min and 60 min of running in the heat. Ten moderately-trained, non-heat-acclimated, male endurance athletes (mean age: 22 ± 6.6 y; height: 1.78 ± 0.10 m; body-mass: 75.7 ± 15.6 kg; VO: 51.6 ± 4.31 mL>kg>min) volunteered for this study. Participants performed two experimental trials: head cooling versus no-cooling (within-subjects factor with trial order randomized). For each trial, participants wore a head-cooling cap for 15 min with the cap either cooled to 0°C (HC) or not cooled (22°C; CON). Participants then completed 2 × 30 min running efforts on a treadmill at 70% VO in hot conditions (35°C, 70% relative humidity), with a 10 min rest between efforts. Working memory was assessed using an operation span (OSPAN) task immediately prior to the 15 min cooling/no-cooling period (22°C, 35% RH) and again after 30 min and 60 min of running in the heat. Numerous physiological variables, including gastrointestinal core temperature (T) were assessed over the protocol. Scores for OSPAN were similar between trials, with no interaction effect or main effects for time and trial found (p = 0.58, p = 0.67, p = 0.54, respectively). Forehead temperature following precooling was lower in HC (32.4 ± 1.6°C) compared with CON (34.5 ± 1.1°C) (p = 0.01), however, no differences were seen in T, skin temperature, heart rate and ratings of perceived exertion between HC and CON trials at any time point assessed (p > 0.05). In conclusion, despite HC reducing forehead temperature prior to exercise, it did not significantly improve cognitive performance during (half-time break) or after subsequent exercise in hot environmental conditions, compared to a no cooling control.
本研究调查了头部冷却对热环境中 30 分钟和 60 分钟跑步后认知表现的影响。十名中等训练水平、非热适应、男性耐力运动员(平均年龄:22 ± 6.6 岁;身高:1.78 ± 0.10 米;体重:75.7 ± 15.6 公斤;VO 251.6 ± 4.31 mL>kg>min)自愿参加了这项研究。参与者进行了两项实验性试验:头部冷却与不冷却(采用试验顺序随机的受试者内因素)。对于每个试验,参与者都戴着一个头部冷却帽 15 分钟,帽内温度要么冷却到 0°C(HC),要么不冷却(22°C;CON)。然后,参与者在热条件下(35°C,70%相对湿度)的跑步机上进行 2 次 30 分钟的跑步,两次之间休息 10 分钟。在冷却/不冷却期(22°C,35%RH)之前和热环境中 30 分钟和 60 分钟跑步后,立即使用操作跨度(OSPAN)任务评估工作记忆。在整个方案中评估了许多生理变量,包括胃肠道核心温度(T)。OSPAN 的分数在试验之间相似,没有时间和试验的交互作用或主要影响(p = 0.58,p = 0.67,p = 0.54,分别)。与 CON 相比,预冷却后额部温度在 HC 时更低(32.4 ± 1.6°C)(p = 0.01),然而,在任何评估的时间点,HC 和 CON 试验之间 T、皮肤温度、心率和感知努力评分均无差异(p > 0.05)。总之,尽管 HC 在运动前降低了额部温度,但与不冷却对照相比,在热环境条件下的运动(半时间休息)期间或之后,它并没有显著提高认知表现。