Sports Medicine Service, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
MGH Institute of Health Professions, Boston, MA, USA.
J Sports Sci Med. 2021 Mar 1;20(1):94-100. doi: 10.52082/jssm.2021.94. eCollection 2021 Mar.
Although there is a commonly held belief within the baseball community that delivery from the stretch confers more stress at the elbow and shoulder joints than delivery from the windup, there remains little evidence in the literature investigating this hypothesis. This study aimed to help address this gap in the literature by studying both intra-pitcher kinematic sequence variability, and intra-pitcher joint torque variability when throwing from the windup vs. the stretch. We hypothesized that 1) each pitchers' kinematic sequence would remain similar whether throwing from the windup or stretch, and 2) Kinematic sequence would influence peak arm torque more than delivery method. This cross-sectional 3D biomechanical study included 88 pitches thrown by ten (6 collegiate, 4 high school) pitchers with a mean age of 17.60 ± 2.63 years. Pitch velocity, throwing shoulder/elbow torques and the kinematic sequence of each pitch utilizing segmental peak angular velocities were captured. No statistically significant differences in ball velocity (p = 0.17), peak shoulder external rotation torque (p = 0.80), shoulder extension torque (p = 0.97), or elbow valgus torque (p = 0.83) were found between delivery approaches. Three primary kinematic sequences were identified. Shoulder external rotation torque [(53,2) = 10.992, ɳ = .293, p < 0.00], shoulder extension torque [(53,2) = 15.517, ɳ = .369, p < 0.00] and elbow valgus torque [(53,2) = 9.994, ɳ = .274, p < 0.00] did vary significantly across these three kinematic sequence patterns. Our data suggest that the kinematic sequence influences shoulder and elbow torque more than the delivery approach. Instructing ideal kinematic sequence may be more influential for injury avoidance than delivery method.
虽然棒球界普遍认为从伸展投球比从预备投球更能增加肘部和肩部关节的压力,但在研究这一假设的文献中,几乎没有证据。本研究旨在通过研究从预备投球和伸展投球时的投手内部运动序列变化和投手内部关节扭矩变化来帮助填补文献中的这一空白。我们假设 1)每个投手的运动序列无论从预备投球还是伸展投球都保持相似,2)运动序列对峰值臂扭矩的影响大于投球方式。这项横断面 3D 生物力学研究包括 10 名(6 名大学生,4 名高中生)投手投掷的 88 个球,平均年龄为 17.60 ± 2.63 岁。捕捉了每个球的球速、投掷肩/肘扭矩以及利用分段峰值角速度的运动序列。在投球方式之间,球速(p = 0.17)、肩部外旋扭矩峰值(p = 0.80)、肩部伸展扭矩峰值(p = 0.97)或肘部外翻扭矩峰值(p = 0.83)没有统计学上的显著差异。确定了三种主要的运动序列。肩部外旋扭矩 [(53,2) = 10.992, ɳ =.293, p < 0.00]、肩部伸展扭矩 [(53,2) = 15.517, ɳ =.369, p < 0.00] 和肘部外翻扭矩 [(53,2) = 9.994, ɳ =.274, p < 0.00] 在这三种运动序列模式下差异显著。我们的数据表明,运动序列比投球方式更能影响肩部和肘部的扭矩。指导理想的运动序列可能比投球方式更能避免受伤。