Zbyrak V, Reverón S L, Smoke S, Mehta A, Marano M A, Lee R
Saint Barnabas Medical Center, Livingston, NJ, USA.
Ann Burns Fire Disasters. 2020 Dec 31;33(4):317-321.
The study investigated antibiotic utilization after the implementation of a procalcitonin (PCT)-guided antibiotic algorithm in the burn intensive care unit (BICU) to minimize antibiotic exposure appropriately. An algorithm established the ordering of an initial procalcitonin level, an additional level following 48 hours post-admission, and upon suspicion of sepsis. The primary endpoint was the percent of days on antibiotics in the BICU. Secondary endpoints were the percent of patients reinitiated on antibiotics, length of BICU and hospital stay, and 30-day mortality. Desirability of Outcome Ranking (DOOR) and Response Adjusted for Duration of Antibiotic Risk (RADAR) methodology aided in antibiotic usage evaluation. The retrospective and prospective phases involved five and seven patients in the final analysis, respectively. The median percent of days on antibiotics in the BICU was 33.3% versus 14.3% in the retrospective and prospective phases, respectively (p=0.222). Secondary outcomes evaluated were percent of patients reinitiated on antibiotics at 80.0% versus 28.6% (p=0.242), the median length of BICU stay at 38 days versus 31 days (p=0.465), the median duration of hospital stay at 39 days versus 37 days (p=0.624) and 30-day mortality of one versus zero cases (p=0.417) in the retrospective and prospective group, respectively. The probability of better DOOR with a PCT-guided antibiotic algorithm versus the control group was 95.7% (95% CI, 81.4-99.5%). The benefit of a PCT-guided antibiotic algorithm implementation cannot be determined based on the small sample size producing a lack of internal validity. Future studies warrant utilizing DOOR/RADAR to evaluate antibiotic stewardship strategies in the burn patient population.
该研究调查了在烧伤重症监护病房(BICU)实施降钙素原(PCT)指导的抗生素使用方案后抗生素的使用情况,以适当减少抗生素暴露。该方案规定了入院时初始降钙素原水平的检测、入院48小时后及怀疑发生脓毒症时再次检测降钙素原水平的要求。主要终点是BICU中使用抗生素的天数百分比。次要终点包括重新开始使用抗生素的患者百分比、BICU住院时间和住院总时长,以及30天死亡率。期望结果排名(DOOR)和抗生素风险持续时间调整反应(RADAR)方法有助于评估抗生素使用情况。回顾性和前瞻性阶段最终分析分别纳入了5例和7例患者。BICU中使用抗生素天数的中位数在回顾性和前瞻性阶段分别为33.3%和14.3%(p = 0.222)。评估的次要结果包括:重新开始使用抗生素的患者百分比在回顾性和前瞻性阶段分别为80.0%和28.6%(p = 0.242);BICU住院时间中位数在回顾性和前瞻性阶段分别为38天和31天(p = 0.465);住院总时长中位数在回顾性和前瞻性阶段分别为39天和37天(p = 0.624);回顾性和前瞻性组的30天死亡率分别为1例和0例(p = 0.417)。与对照组相比,采用PCT指导的抗生素使用方案获得更好DOOR的概率为95.7%(95%CI,81.4 - 99.5%)。由于样本量小导致缺乏内部效度,因此无法确定实施PCT指导的抗生素使用方案的益处。未来的研究有必要利用DOOR/RADAR来评估烧伤患者群体中的抗生素管理策略。