Wang Qiang, Xie Xiongyao, Yu Hongjie, Mooney Michael A
Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China.
Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Colorado School of Mines, Golden CO80401, USA.
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2021 Feb 20;2021:6678355. doi: 10.1155/2021/6678355. eCollection 2021.
The safety of tunneling with shield tunnel boring machines largely depends on the tunnel face pressure, which is currently decided by human operators empirically. Face pressure control is vulnerable to human misjudgment and human errors can cause severe consequences, especially in difficult ground conditions. From a practical perspective, it is therefore beneficial to have a model capable of predicting the tunnel face pressure given operation and the changing geology. In this paper, we propose such a model based on deep learning. More specifically, a long short-term memory (LSTM) recurrent neural network is employed for tunnel face pressure prediction. To correlate with PLC data, linear interpolation is employed to transform the borehole geological data into sequential geological data according to the shield machine position. The slurry pressure in the excavation chamber (SPE) is taken as the output in the case study of Nanning Metro, which is confronted with the clogging problem due to the mixed ground of mudstone and round gravel. The LSTM-based SPE prediction model achieved an overall MAPE and RMSE of 3.83% and 10.3 kPa, respectively, in mudstone rich ground conditions. Factors that influence the model, including different kinds and length of input data and comparison with the traditional machine learning-based model, are also discussed.
盾构隧道掘进机的掘进安全性很大程度上取决于掌子面压力,目前该压力由人工操作凭经验确定。掌子面压力控制易受人为误判影响,人为失误可能导致严重后果,尤其是在复杂地质条件下。因此,从实际角度来看,拥有一个能够根据操作和不断变化的地质情况预测掌子面压力的模型是有益的。在本文中,我们提出了一种基于深度学习的模型。更具体地说,采用长短期记忆(LSTM)循环神经网络进行掌子面压力预测。为了与可编程逻辑控制器(PLC)数据相关联,采用线性插值法根据盾构机位置将钻孔地质数据转换为序列地质数据。在南宁地铁的案例研究中,将开挖舱内的泥浆压力(SPE)作为输出,该地铁因泥岩和圆砾混合地层而面临堵塞问题。在富含泥岩的地质条件下,基于LSTM的SPE预测模型的总体平均绝对百分比误差(MAPE)和均方根误差(RMSE)分别达到3.83%和10.3kPa。还讨论了影响该模型的因素,包括不同类型和长度的输入数据以及与传统机器学习模型的比较。