Suppr超能文献

三种淋巴结分期方法对乳腺癌乳房切除患者预后预测的比较

Comparison of three lymph node staging methods for predicting outcome in breast cancer patients with mastectomy.

作者信息

Wang Meng-Shen, Wang Mo-Zhi, Wang Zhenning, Song Yongxi, Gao Peng, Wang Pengliang, Wang Chong, Yu Xueting, Wei Fengheng, Guo Jingyi, Xu Yingying

机构信息

Department of Breast Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.

Department of Surgical Oncology, the First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.

出版信息

Ann Transl Med. 2021 Feb;9(4):300. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-4856.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Axillary lymph node (ALN) staging is essential in predicting the clinical outcome of breast cancer (BC) patients. Traditionally, it follows the tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging, but its accuracy needs further improvement.

METHODS

A total of 9,616 BC patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database and 675 patients from the First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University underwent mastectomy together with ALN dissection were reviewed. Univariate and multivariate logistic analyses were conducted to find the most meaningful factors relevant to prognosis.

RESULTS

After univariate and multivariate analyses, age, race, primary site, radiation, chemotherapy, grade, T-stage, estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), total number of positive lymph nodes (pN), positive lymph node ratio (LNR) and log odds of positive LNs (LODDS) were found to be significantly associated with overall survival (OS). Using these non-LN risk factors, we further compared the efficacy of three different ALN staging methods in prognosis via nomograms. Harrell's concordance index (C-index) and Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) were used to measure nomogram performance of the ALN staging methods: pN: C-index=0.687 (95% CI: 0.678-0.696), AIC =61,398.24; LNR: C-index =0.691 (95% CI: 0.683-0.701), AIC =61,313.56; and LODDS: C-index =0.691 (95% CI: 0.682-0.700), AIC =61,315.60. We found that the nomogram incorporating LODDS had better predictive ability compared with other two methods. Furthermore, an external validation revealed a C-index of 0.753 (95% CI: 0.690-0.816) for the Asian population, which indicates the nomogram based on LODDS may have universality for both Western and Asian populations.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with pN and LNR, LODDS showed higher homeostasis in LN evaluation, and showed marked efficacy in evaluating survival differences among patients with negative LN staging. We constructed a BC prognosis model by incorporating highly relevant clinical pathological factors and a new method of LN staging, which may greatly aid in guiding postoperative treatment.

摘要

背景

腋窝淋巴结(ALN)分期对于预测乳腺癌(BC)患者的临床结局至关重要。传统上,它遵循肿瘤-淋巴结-转移(TNM)分期,但其准确性仍需进一步提高。

方法

回顾性分析了监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库中的9616例BC患者以及中国医科大学附属第一医院的675例行乳房切除术并进行ALN清扫的患者。进行单因素和多因素逻辑分析以找出与预后最相关的因素。

结果

经过单因素和多因素分析,发现年龄、种族、原发部位、放疗、化疗、分级、T分期、雌激素受体(ER)、孕激素受体(PR)、阳性淋巴结总数(pN)、阳性淋巴结比率(LNR)和阳性淋巴结对数优势比(LODDS)与总生存期(OS)显著相关。使用这些非淋巴结危险因素,我们通过列线图进一步比较了三种不同ALN分期方法在预后方面的疗效。采用Harrell一致性指数(C指数)和赤池信息准则(AIC)来衡量ALN分期方法的列线图性能:pN:C指数=0.687(95%CI:0.678-0.696),AIC =61398.24;LNR:C指数 =0.691(95%CI:0.683-0.701),AIC =61313.56;LODDS:C指数 =0.691(95%CI:0.682-0.700),AIC =61315.60。我们发现,与其他两种方法相比,纳入LODDS的列线图具有更好的预测能力。此外,外部验证显示亚洲人群的C指数为0.753(95%CI:0.690-0.816),这表明基于LODDS的列线图可能对西方和亚洲人群都具有通用性。

结论

与pN和LNR相比,LODDS在淋巴结评估中显示出更高的稳定性,并且在评估淋巴结阴性分期患者的生存差异方面显示出显著疗效。我们通过纳入高度相关的临床病理因素和一种新的淋巴结分期方法构建了一个BC预后模型,这可能极大地有助于指导术后治疗。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa26/7944312/80189c36da17/atm-09-04-300-f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验