Institute of Cancer Policy, King's College London, UK.
University of Manitoba and CancerCare Manitoba, Canada.
Cancer Treat Rev. 2017 Nov;60:18-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2017.08.001. Epub 2017 Aug 19.
One year of trastuzumab, chosen empirically, improves survival of women with early-stage, HER2-positive breast cancer but also adds substantially to cost, toxicity, and inconvenience. Longer treatment does not improve outcomes, but potentiates toxicities.
Medline, Embase, and major conference proceedings were searched systematically in June 2017 to identify Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) comparing one year versus shorter durations of trastuzumab in adjuvant treatment of breast cancer. Reported Hazard-Ratios (HR) for Overall Survival (OS) and Disease-Free Survival (DFS), and Odds-Ratio for cardiac events, with respective 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) from each study was weighted using generic inverse-variance, and pooled in a meta-analysis. Inter-study heterogeneity and sub-group difference (based on hormone-receptors and node-positivity) were assessed using I, and chi statistics, respectively.
Four studies (n=7614) satisfied inclusion criteria. Individual RCTs had diverse pre-specified upper-limits of 95% CI for declaring non-inferiority (range: <1.15 to <1.53). Pooled results demonstrated significant improvements in OS (HR 1.28, p=0.04), and DFS (HR 1.24, p=0.005) with 1year of trastuzumab compared to shorter durations. Absence of multiplicity argument allowed for declaring superiority of 1year of trastuzumab based on our results despite non-inferiority designs of individual trials. No influence on overall effect by duration of trastuzumab in experimental arm (9weeks versus 6months) was noted. No statistical interaction by hormone-receptor status and node-positivity on overall results was noticed [p(sub-group difference) 0.73, and 0.52, respectively]. Odds-Ratio for cardiac events was 2.65 (p<0.001) favoring shorter duration.
One year of trastuzumab prolongs overall, and disease-free survivals in women with early-stage HER2 positive breast cancer compared to shorter durations and this should remain as the standard of care. Cardiotoxicity increased significantly with the 1-year treatment.
曲妥珠单抗的一年治疗方案是经验性选择的,可改善 HER2 阳性早期乳腺癌患者的生存,但也会显著增加成本、毒性和不便。延长治疗时间并不能改善结局,但会增加毒性。
我们于 2017 年 6 月系统地检索了 Medline、Embase 和主要会议记录,以确定比较曲妥珠单抗辅助治疗乳腺癌一年与较短时间的随机对照试验(RCT)。使用通用倒数方差法对来自每个研究的报告的总生存(OS)和无病生存(DFS)的风险比(HR)以及心脏事件的优势比(OR)及其各自的 95%置信区间(CI)进行加权,并进行荟萃分析。使用 I 和卡方统计,评估了研究间异质性和亚组差异(基于激素受体和淋巴结阳性)。
四项研究(n=7614)符合纳入标准。个别 RCT 有不同的预先指定的 95%CI 上限,用于宣布非劣效性(范围:<1.15 至 <1.53)。荟萃分析结果表明,与较短时间相比,曲妥珠单抗治疗 1 年可显著改善 OS(HR 1.28,p=0.04)和 DFS(HR 1.24,p=0.005)。尽管个别试验的设计为非劣效性,但我们的结果允许宣布曲妥珠单抗治疗 1 年的优越性。在实验组中,曲妥珠单抗的持续时间对整体效果没有影响(9 周与 6 个月)。未观察到激素受体状态和淋巴结阳性对总体结果的统计学交互作用[亚组差异的 p 值分别为 0.73 和 0.52]。心脏事件的 OR 为 2.65(p<0.001),支持较短的持续时间。
与较短时间相比,曲妥珠单抗治疗 1 年可延长早期 HER2 阳性乳腺癌女性的总生存期和无病生存期,这应作为标准治疗。1 年治疗的心脏毒性显著增加。