• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

MDADI 量表的心理测量学特性——更少是否真的更好?的初步研究

Psychometric Properties of the MDADI-A Preliminary Study of Whether Less is Truly More?

机构信息

Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, 3rd Floor, William Leech Building, Medical School, Framlington Place, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, UK.

Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.

出版信息

Dysphagia. 2022 Apr;37(2):323-332. doi: 10.1007/s00455-021-10281-9. Epub 2021 Mar 11.

DOI:10.1007/s00455-021-10281-9
PMID:33709289
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8948102/
Abstract

The MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) is a 20-item dysphagia-specific QOL questionnaire with four subscales: global, emotional, functional, and physical. It is widely used in clinical practice and in research; however, its psychometric properties have been under-researched. We aim to evaluate the organisation of the MDADI subscales and identify any redundant items. The MDADI is a routinely collected outcome measure at two centres in northeast England. Questionnaires completed at three months following treatment were extracted from these existing databases. Factor analysis was carried out with the aim of reducing redundancy among the set of questionnaire items. Cases with missing values were excluded. A total of 196 complete patient questionnaires were used in factor analysis. A one-factor model accounted for around 50% of the total variance in item responses. The top five endorsed items (abbreviated by the questionnaire item keywords: Excluded, Irritate, Esteem, Social, and Why) in this one factor appeared in three (emotional, functional, and physical) of the four supposed MDADI subscales, i.e. global, emotional, functional, and physical. Our results suggest an overlap of three MDADI subscales across the top five endorsed items. The content of the top five questions all appear related to the psychosocial aspects of swallowing. This implies some redundancy of the items in the original subscales of the questionnaire. Using the most endorsed items, it appears feasible to abbreviate the 20-item MDADI questionnaire to a 5-item "MiniDADI" questionnaire, which is likely to have greater utility in routine clinical practice outside of research settings.

摘要

MD 安德森吞咽障碍问卷 (MDADI) 是一个 20 项的吞咽障碍特异性生活质量问卷,包含四个分量表:整体、情绪、功能和生理。它在临床实践和研究中被广泛应用;然而,其心理测量学特性的研究还不够充分。我们旨在评估 MDADI 分量表的组织,并确定任何冗余项目。MDADI 是英格兰东北部的两个中心常规收集的结果测量指标。从这些现有数据库中提取了治疗后三个月完成的问卷。进行因子分析的目的是减少问卷项目集之间的冗余。排除缺失值的病例。共有 196 份完整的患者问卷用于因子分析。一个因素模型解释了项目反应总方差的约 50%。在这一个因素中,排名前五的项目(通过问卷项目关键词缩写:排除、刺激、自尊、社会和原因)出现在四个假定的 MDADI 分量表中的三个(整体、情绪和功能),即整体、情绪和功能。我们的结果表明,前五个认可项目在三个 MDADI 分量表之间存在重叠。前五个问题的内容都与吞咽的社会心理方面有关。这意味着问卷原始分量表中的项目存在一定程度的冗余。使用最认可的项目,将 20 项的 MDADI 问卷缩写为 5 项的“MiniDADI”问卷似乎是可行的,这可能会在研究环境之外的常规临床实践中具有更大的效用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90e6/8948102/151534ece017/455_2021_10281_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90e6/8948102/be1348572139/455_2021_10281_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90e6/8948102/aa686a1f9efb/455_2021_10281_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90e6/8948102/151534ece017/455_2021_10281_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90e6/8948102/be1348572139/455_2021_10281_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90e6/8948102/aa686a1f9efb/455_2021_10281_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90e6/8948102/151534ece017/455_2021_10281_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Psychometric Properties of the MDADI-A Preliminary Study of Whether Less is Truly More?MDADI 量表的心理测量学特性——更少是否真的更好?的初步研究
Dysphagia. 2022 Apr;37(2):323-332. doi: 10.1007/s00455-021-10281-9. Epub 2021 Mar 11.
2
Reliability and Validity of the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory Among Japanese Patients.MD安德森吞咽困难量表在日本患者中的信度和效度
Dysphagia. 2018 Feb;33(1):123-132. doi: 10.1007/s00455-017-9842-y. Epub 2017 Aug 24.
3
The development and validation of a dysphagia-specific quality-of-life questionnaire for patients with head and neck cancer: the M. D. Anderson dysphagia inventory.头颈部癌患者吞咽困难特异性生活质量问卷的开发与验证:MD安德森吞咽困难量表
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2001 Jul;127(7):870-6.
4
Validity and Reliability of an Arabic Version of MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI).MD Anderson 吞咽障碍问卷(MDADI)阿拉伯语版的有效性和可靠性。
Dysphagia. 2022 Aug;37(4):946-953. doi: 10.1007/s00455-021-10356-7. Epub 2021 Aug 24.
5
Relationship between swallow-specific quality of life and fiber-optic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing findings in patients with head and neck cancer.头颈部癌症患者吞咽特异性生活质量与吞咽功能的纤维内镜评估结果之间的关系。
Head Neck. 2016 Apr;38 Suppl 1:E1848-56. doi: 10.1002/hed.24333. Epub 2015 Dec 23.
6
Validity and reliability of the MD Anderson dysphagia inventory in English and Chinese in head and neck cancer patients.头颈部癌症患者中英文版 MD Anderson 吞咽困难量表的效度和信度。
Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2020 Dec;16(6):372-379. doi: 10.1111/ajco.13384. Epub 2020 Jun 23.
7
Quality of life in oncological patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia: validity and reliability of the Dutch version of the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory and the Deglutition Handicap Index.头颈部癌吞咽困难患者的生活质量:荷兰版 MD Anderson 吞咽困难指数和吞咽障碍指数的信度和效度。
Dysphagia. 2011 Dec;26(4):407-14. doi: 10.1007/s00455-011-9327-3. Epub 2011 Jan 29.
8
Validation of the Swedish M. D. Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) in patients with head and neck cancer and neurologic swallowing disturbances.验证瑞典 M. D. 安德森吞咽障碍问卷 (MDADI) 在头颈部癌症和神经吞咽障碍患者中的应用。
Dysphagia. 2012 Sep;27(3):361-9. doi: 10.1007/s00455-011-9375-8. Epub 2011 Nov 22.
9
Prospective evaluation of patient reported swallow function with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT), MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) and the Sydney Swallow Questionnaire (SSQ) in head and neck cancer patients.前瞻性评估头颈部癌症患者的功能性评估癌症治疗(FACT)、MD 安德森吞咽障碍量表(MDADI)和悉尼吞咽问卷(SSQ)的患者报告吞咽功能。
Oral Oncol. 2018 Sep;84:25-30. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2018.05.012. Epub 2018 Jul 3.
10
Patient-Reported Outcomes After Swallowing (SWOARs)-Sparing IMRT in Head and Neck Cancers: Primary Results from a Prospective Study Endorsed by the Head and Neck Study Group (HNSG) of the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO).头颈部癌症中保留吞咽功能的调强放疗(SWOARs-IMRT)后的患者报告结局:意大利放射治疗和临床肿瘤学协会(AIRO)头颈部研究组(HNSG)支持的前瞻性研究的初步结果。
Dysphagia. 2023 Feb;38(1):159-170. doi: 10.1007/s00455-022-10434-4. Epub 2022 May 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Validation of the Finnish MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) in patients with head and neck cancer.芬兰版MD安德森吞咽困难量表(MDADI)在头颈癌患者中的效度验证
Sci Rep. 2025 May 30;15(1):18980. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-03616-1.
2
Dysphagia Advances in Head and Neck Cancer.头颈部癌症吞咽困难的进展
Curr Otorhinolaryngol Rep. 2023 Feb 15:1-8. doi: 10.1007/s40136-023-00445-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Radiotherapy versus transoral robotic surgery and neck dissection for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (ORATOR): an open-label, phase 2, randomised trial.放疗与经口机器人手术和颈部清扫术治疗口咽鳞状细胞癌(ORATOR):一项开放标签、2 期、随机试验。
Lancet Oncol. 2019 Oct;20(10):1349-1359. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30410-3. Epub 2019 Aug 12.
2
Swallowing beyond six years post (chemo)radiotherapy for head and neck cancer; a cohort study.头颈部癌症放化疗后 6 年以上的吞咽情况:一项队列研究。
Oral Oncol. 2018 Aug;83:53-58. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2018.06.003. Epub 2018 Jun 12.
3
Changes in Patient-reported Swallow Function in the Long Term After Chemoradiotherapy for Oropharyngeal Carcinoma.
放化疗治疗口咽癌后长期患者报告吞咽功能的变化。
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2018 Dec;30(12):756-763. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2018.06.013. Epub 2018 Jul 17.
4
Best Practices for Developing and Validating Scales for Health, Social, and Behavioral Research: A Primer.健康、社会和行为研究量表开发与验证的最佳实践:入门指南。
Front Public Health. 2018 Jun 11;6:149. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149. eCollection 2018.
5
Feasibility and acceptability of combining cognitive behavioural therapy techniques with swallowing therapy in head and neck cancer dysphagia.头颈部癌症吞咽困难中认知行为疗法技术与吞咽疗法相结合的可行性和可接受性。
BMC Cancer. 2018 Jan 2;18(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3892-2.
6
Patient-reported outcome measures in dysphagia: a systematic review of instrument development and validation.吞咽困难患者报告结局量表:量表开发与验证的系统评价
Dis Esophagus. 2017 May 1;30(5):1-23. doi: 10.1093/dote/dow028.
7
DARS: a phase III randomised multicentre study of dysphagia- optimised intensity- modulated radiotherapy (Do-IMRT) versus standard intensity- modulated radiotherapy (S-IMRT) in head and neck cancer.DARS:一项关于吞咽困难优化调强放疗(Do-IMRT)与标准调强放疗(S-IMRT)治疗头颈癌的III期随机多中心研究。
BMC Cancer. 2016 Oct 6;16(1):770. doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2813-0.
8
Dynamic Imaging Grade of Swallowing Toxicity (DIGEST): Scale development and validation.吞咽毒性动态成像分级(DIGEST):量表的开发与验证
Cancer. 2017 Jan 1;123(1):62-70. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30283. Epub 2016 Aug 26.
9
Long-Term, Prospective Performance of the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory in "Low-Intermediate Risk" Oropharyngeal Carcinoma After Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy.MD安德森吞咽困难量表在“低-中度风险”口咽癌调强放疗后的长期前瞻性表现
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017 Mar 15;97(4):700-708. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.06.010. Epub 2016 Jun 15.
10
Swallowing outcome measures in head and neck cancer--How do they compare?头颈癌吞咽结果测量——它们如何比较?
Oral Oncol. 2016 Jan;52:104-8. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2015.10.015. Epub 2015 Nov 10.