Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maimonides Medical Center and SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, and Lawyering for Reproductive Justice, New York, New York.
Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Apr 1;137(4):626-628. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004319.
The future of Roe v Wade is uncertain. If it is overturned, protection of reproductive rights will be determined by the acts of individual state governments, some of which have already signaled that they will ban or severely restrict access to abortion. Health care professionals working in states that maintain the laws that applied in the time before the overturn of Roe may wish to provide assistance-anything from consultation to shipping medications-to women living in more restrictive venues. However, it is important for health care professionals to be aware of the legal consequences of those acts, as well as ethical considerations, when deciding whether to adhere to or to defy laws that they believe threaten the well-being of women. It is likely that legal consequences will vary with the type of act in which a physician engages. This article will review legal considerations, to the extent that they can be known at this point, as well as the ethics of civil disobedience.
罗伊诉韦德案的未来尚不确定。如果该裁决被推翻,生殖权利的保护将由各州政府的行为决定,其中一些州已经表示将禁止或严格限制堕胎。在推翻罗伊案之前适用的法律的州工作的医疗保健专业人员可能希望为生活在限制更严格场所的妇女提供帮助——从咨询到运输药物。然而,医疗保健专业人员在决定是否遵守或违反他们认为威胁妇女福祉的法律时,了解这些行为的法律后果以及伦理考虑因素非常重要。医生所从事的行为类型可能会导致法律后果的不同。本文将回顾法律方面的考虑因素(在这一点上,尽可能地了解),以及公民抗命的伦理问题。