Emergency Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Eur J Emerg Med. 2021 Oct 1;28(5):355-362. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000804.
Current guidelines recommend noncontrast computed tomography (NCCT) followed by lumbar puncture for the diagnosis of subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Alternative strategies, including clinical risk stratification and CT angiography (CTA), are emerging.
To evaluate alternative strategies to current guidelines through clinical risk stratification.
DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Single-site, retrospective observational study of patients with SAH suspicion, from 2011 to 2016. We combined results of each investigation (NCCT, CTA and lumbar puncture) with a clinical risk assessment, including Ottawa score.
Comparing the current strategy (NCCT ± lumbar puncture if negative CT) to alternative strategies (NCCT + CTA ± lumbar puncture if high clinical risk or negative CT and onset of headache ≥12 h o dds ratio ≥24 h).
Main outcome was diagnosis of SAH at hospital discharge. Secondary outcomes were death from all causes and need for invasive procedures at 28 days. We used sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value (NPV) to evaluate the diagnostic performance of three strategies.
310 patients were included. SAH was diagnosed in 8 cases (2.6%), none died and 7 (2.2%) had a surgical procedure. Performances of different strategies were not statistically different. NPVs were 99.7% [95% Confidence interval (CI), 98.2-100%] for strategy 1 and 100% (95% CI, 98.8-100%) for strategies 2 and 3. More than 4000 lumbar punctures are needed to diagnose one SAH when CTA is performed within 24 h of symptoms' onset and absence of high-risk criteria.
Clinical risk stratification and CTA strategy are well-tolerated and effective for diagnosis of SAH, avoiding systematic use of lumbar puncture.
目前的指南建议对疑似蛛网膜下腔出血(SAH)患者进行非对比计算机断层扫描(NCCT),然后进行腰椎穿刺。替代策略,包括临床风险分层和 CT 血管造影(CTA),正在出现。
通过临床风险分层评估替代现行指南的策略。
设计、地点和参与者:这是一项 2011 年至 2016 年对疑似蛛网膜下腔出血患者的单站点、回顾性观察性研究。我们将每个检查(NCCT、CTA 和腰椎穿刺)的结果与临床风险评估(包括渥太华评分)相结合。
将当前策略(NCCT ± 如果 CT 阴性则进行腰椎穿刺)与替代策略(NCCT + CTA ± 如果临床风险高或 CT 阴性且头痛发作≥12 小时 OR 比值≥24 小时)进行比较。
主要结果是出院时的 SAH 诊断。次要结果是所有原因的死亡和 28 天内需要侵入性治疗。我们使用敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值(NPV)来评估三种策略的诊断性能。
共纳入 310 例患者。诊断为 8 例 SAH(2.6%),无人死亡,7 例(2.2%)进行了手术。不同策略的表现无统计学差异。策略 1 的 NPV 为 99.7%[95%置信区间(CI),98.2-100%],策略 2 和 3 的 NPV 均为 100%(95%CI,98.8-100%)。当 CTA 在症状发作后 24 小时内进行且无高危标准时,需要进行超过 4000 次腰椎穿刺才能诊断出一例 SAH。
临床风险分层和 CTA 策略对 SAH 的诊断是安全有效的,可以避免系统地进行腰椎穿刺。