• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于触摸屏的食物趋近偏倚评估:可靠性和项目特异性偏好研究。

Touchscreen-based assessment of food approach biases: Investigating reliability and item-specific preferences.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Paris-Lodron-University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria; Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Paris-Lodron-University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.

Department of Psychology, Paris-Lodron-University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria; Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Paris-Lodron-University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.

出版信息

Appetite. 2021 Aug 1;163:105190. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105190. Epub 2021 Mar 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.appet.2021.105190
PMID:33711352
Abstract

Strong cravings for unhealthy foods and implicit tendencies to approach them threaten the physical and mental health of vulnerable populations. Yet, implicit measures of food approach tendencies have methodological limitations, as existing approach-avoidance tasks (AAT) are often unreliable and require specialized hardware. We propose a novel method to measure approach biases: on a touchscreen, participants slide their hand either toward a food item (and away from control images) or away from it (and toward control images) in separate blocks. Adequate attention to the stimuli is ensured by the coupling of stimulus category to the required response. We found that this touchscreen-variant of the AAT yielded reliable bias scores when approach and avoidance were defined as movements relative to the stimulus rather than to the body. Compared to control images, we found an approach bias for low-calorie foods but not for high-calorie foods. This bias additionally varied on a food-by-food basis depending on the participant's desire to eat individual food items. Correlations with state and trait cravings were inconclusive. Future research needs to address the order effects that were found, in which participants avoiding foods in the first block showed larger biases than participants approaching food in the first block, likely due to insufficient opportunity to practice the task. Our findings highlight the need for approach bias retraining paradigms to use personalized stimulus sets. The task can enrich the methodological repertoire of research on eating disorders, obesity and cognitive bias modification.

摘要

强烈渴望不健康的食物和接近它们的隐含倾向威胁到弱势群体的身心健康。然而,食物接近倾向的内隐测量存在方法学上的局限性,因为现有的接近回避任务(AAT)往往不可靠,并且需要专门的硬件。我们提出了一种测量接近偏差的新方法:在触摸屏上,参与者在单独的模块中滑动他们的手,向食物项目(远离控制图像)或远离它(向控制图像)。通过将刺激类别与所需的反应相结合,确保了对刺激的充分关注。我们发现,当接近和回避被定义为相对于刺激而不是身体的运动时,这种 AAT 的触摸屏变体产生了可靠的偏差分数。与控制图像相比,我们发现低卡路里食物存在接近偏差,但高热量食物不存在。这种偏差还根据参与者对个别食物的进食欲望在食物与食物之间有所不同。与状态和特质渴望的相关性没有定论。未来的研究需要解决发现的顺序效应,即在第一个模块中回避食物的参与者比在第一个模块中接近食物的参与者表现出更大的偏差,这可能是由于没有足够的机会练习任务。我们的研究结果强调了需要使用个性化刺激集的接近偏差再训练范式。该任务可以丰富进食障碍、肥胖和认知偏差修正研究的方法学。

相似文献

1
Touchscreen-based assessment of food approach biases: Investigating reliability and item-specific preferences.基于触摸屏的食物趋近偏倚评估:可靠性和项目特异性偏好研究。
Appetite. 2021 Aug 1;163:105190. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105190. Epub 2021 Mar 9.
2
Reliability and convergence of approach/avoidance bias assessment tasks in the food consumption domain.食物消费领域趋近/回避偏差评估任务的可靠性和收敛性。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2023 May;76(5):968-978. doi: 10.1177/17470218221108270. Epub 2022 Jul 6.
3
Approach-avoidance tendencies towards food: Measurement on a touchscreen and the role of attention and food craving.对食物的趋近-回避倾向:在触摸屏上的测量以及注意力和食物渴望的作用。
Appetite. 2019 Jun 1;137:145-151. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2019.03.002. Epub 2019 Mar 6.
4
Improving the touchscreen-based food approach-avoidance task: remediated block-order effects and initial findings regarding validity.改进基于触摸屏的食物趋近-回避任务:纠正组块顺序效应及关于效度的初步发现。
Open Res Eur. 2021 Aug 20;1:15. doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.13241.3. eCollection 2021.
5
Food approach bias is moderated by the desire to eat specific foods.食物趋近偏差受特定食物进食欲望的调节。
Appetite. 2020 Nov 1;154:104758. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2020.104758. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
6
Comparison of different response devices to assess behavioral tendencies towards chocolate in the approach-avoidance task.比较不同的反应装置,以评估在趋近-回避任务中对巧克力的行为倾向。
Appetite. 2021 Oct 1;165:105294. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105294. Epub 2021 May 12.
7
Touchscreen-based approach-avoidance responses to appetitive and threatening stimuli.基于触摸屏的趋近-回避反应对奖赏和威胁性刺激的反应。
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2023 Mar;78:101806. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2022.101806. Epub 2022 Nov 23.
8
Measurement of food-related approach-avoidance biases: Larger biases when food stimuli are task relevant.测量与食物相关的趋近-回避偏见:当食物刺激与任务相关时,偏见更大。
Appetite. 2018 Jun 1;125:42-47. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2018.01.032. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
9
Measuring approach-avoidance tendencies towards food with touchscreen-based arm movements.使用基于触摸屏的手臂运动来测量对食物的趋近-回避倾向。
Psychol Res. 2020 Oct;84(7):1789-1800. doi: 10.1007/s00426-019-01195-1. Epub 2019 May 4.
10
Cognitive reappraisal of low-calorie food predicts real-world craving and consumption of high- and low-calorie foods in daily life.对低热量食物的认知重评可预测日常生活中对高、低热量食物的真实渴望和消费。
Appetite. 2018 Dec 1;131:44-52. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2018.08.036. Epub 2018 Aug 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Improving the touchscreen-based food approach-avoidance task: remediated block-order effects and initial findings regarding validity.改进基于触摸屏的食物趋近-回避任务:纠正组块顺序效应及关于效度的初步发现。
Open Res Eur. 2021 Aug 20;1:15. doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.13241.3. eCollection 2021.
2
How pre-processing decisions affect the reliability and validity of the approach-avoidance task: Evidence from simulations and multiverse analyses with six datasets.预处理决策如何影响趋近回避任务的可靠性和有效性:来自六个数据集的模拟和多元宇宙分析的证据。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Mar;56(3):1551-1582. doi: 10.3758/s13428-023-02109-1. Epub 2023 May 23.
3
Testing the effectiveness of a mobile approach avoidance intervention and measuring approach biases in an ecological momentary assessment context: study protocol for a randomised-controlled trial.
在生态瞬间评估背景下测试移动回避干预的有效性并测量接近偏差:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Apr 25;13(4):e070443. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070443.
4
Conflict in a word-based approach-avoidance task is stronger with positive words.在基于词汇的趋近回避任务中,积极词汇的冲突更强。
Brain Behav. 2023 Jun;13(6):e3008. doi: 10.1002/brb3.3008. Epub 2023 May 11.
5
Differential Orbitofrontal Cortex Responses to Chocolate Images While Performing an Approach-Avoidance Task in the MRI Environment.在 MRI 环境中进行趋近-回避任务时,巧克力图像引起的眶额皮质差异反应。
Nutrients. 2023 Jan 3;15(1):244. doi: 10.3390/nu15010244.
6
Test-retest reliability of a smartphone-based approach-avoidance task: Effects of retest period, stimulus type, and demographics.基于智能手机的趋近-回避任务的重测信度:重测时间、刺激类型和人口统计学因素的影响。
Behav Res Methods. 2023 Aug;55(5):2652-2668. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-01920-6. Epub 2022 Aug 1.