• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在生态瞬间评估背景下测试移动回避干预的有效性并测量接近偏差:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。

Testing the effectiveness of a mobile approach avoidance intervention and measuring approach biases in an ecological momentary assessment context: study protocol for a randomised-controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Paris Lodron Universitat Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria

Department of Psychology, Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience, Salzburg, Austria.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2023 Apr 25;13(4):e070443. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070443.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070443
PMID:37185192
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10151942/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Unhealthy eating behaviour is a major contributor to obesity and related diseases and is associated with a behavioural bias to approach rather than avoid desired foods, as measured with reaction time tasks. Approach-avoidance interventions (AAIs) have been proposed as a way to modify food evaluations and help people to eat in accordance with their dietary goals. Mobile implementations of AAI might be easily accessible, low threshold interventions, but their effectiveness has not been established yet.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Participants who aim to change their eating behaviour are randomised to intervention or control groups. They complete six sessions of a smartphone-based AAI, in which they push (ie, avoid) or pull (ie, approach) personalised food images. Intervention group participants always avoid foods that they personally want to eat less often and approach foods that they personally want to eat more often. In the control group, images are paired equally often with both response directions. To evaluate contextual and dynamic intervention effects, ecological momentary assessment (EMA) is measured throughout, with questions about food intake, hunger, stress, emotions, eating intentions, food craving and impulsivity twice a day. Additional EMA preintervention and postintervention measures are administered before and after the intervention phase (4 days each) with a 1-day follow-up EMA 4 weeks after the intervention. Multilevel models will examine the temporal covariance between approach bias and self-reported variables as well as short-term and long-term intervention effects on approach bias, food intake and craving.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Salzburg. Results will be published in peer-reviewed scientific journals and presented at scientific conferences.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

German Clinical Trials Register DRKS, registration number DRKS00030780.

摘要

简介

不健康的饮食习惯是导致肥胖和相关疾病的主要因素,并且与一种行为偏见有关,即接近而不是避免想吃的食物,这可以通过反应时间任务来衡量。接近-回避干预(AAI)被提议作为一种改变食物评价和帮助人们根据饮食目标进食的方法。基于移动设备的 AAI 可能更容易获得且门槛较低,但它们的有效性尚未得到证实。

方法和分析

旨在改变饮食行为的参与者被随机分配到干预组或对照组。他们完成六轮基于智能手机的 AAI,在其中他们推动(即回避)或拉动(即接近)个性化的食物图像。干预组的参与者总是回避他们个人想要少吃的食物,而接近他们个人想要多吃的食物。在对照组中,图像与两种反应方向的配对频率相等。为了评估情境和动态干预效果,通过每天两次的饮食摄入、饥饿感、压力、情绪、饮食意图、食物渴望和冲动的问题,进行整个过程中的生态瞬时评估(EMA)。在干预阶段(每天 4 天)前后进行额外的 EMA 预干预和后干预测量,并在干预后 4 周进行 1 天的 EMA 随访。多层模型将检查接近偏差和自我报告变量之间的时间协方差,以及短期和长期干预对接近偏差、食物摄入和渴望的影响。

伦理和传播

该研究得到了萨尔茨堡大学伦理委员会的批准。结果将发表在同行评议的科学期刊上,并在科学会议上展示。

试验注册号

德国临床试验注册处 DRKS,注册号 DRKS00030780。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/165a/10151942/8256d42fa8d3/bmjopen-2022-070443f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/165a/10151942/ec039e9bcde1/bmjopen-2022-070443f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/165a/10151942/1d1fa2fb96ed/bmjopen-2022-070443f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/165a/10151942/8256d42fa8d3/bmjopen-2022-070443f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/165a/10151942/ec039e9bcde1/bmjopen-2022-070443f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/165a/10151942/1d1fa2fb96ed/bmjopen-2022-070443f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/165a/10151942/8256d42fa8d3/bmjopen-2022-070443f03.jpg

相似文献

1
Testing the effectiveness of a mobile approach avoidance intervention and measuring approach biases in an ecological momentary assessment context: study protocol for a randomised-controlled trial.在生态瞬间评估背景下测试移动回避干预的有效性并测量接近偏差:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Apr 25;13(4):e070443. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070443.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Networks of stress, affect and eating behaviour: anticipated stress coping predicts goal-congruent eating in young adults.压力、情感和饮食行为网络:预期压力应对预测年轻成年人的目标一致的饮食行为。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2021 Jan 9;18(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s12966-020-01066-8.
4
Why we don't eat as intended: Moderators of the short-term intention-behaviour relation in food intake.为什么我们的饮食行为与初衷不符:食物摄入中短期意图-行为关系的调节因素。
Br J Health Psychol. 2024 Sep;29(3):576-588. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12714. Epub 2024 Jan 30.
5
Effects of a Smartphone-Based Approach-Avoidance Intervention on Chocolate Craving and Consumption: Randomized Controlled Trial.基于智能手机的回避干预对巧克力渴望和消费的影响:随机对照试验。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Nov 1;7(11):e12298. doi: 10.2196/12298.
6
A Smartphone-Delivered Ecological Momentary Intervention for Problem Gambling (GamblingLess: Curb Your Urge): Single-Arm Acceptability and Feasibility Trial.一款用于问题赌博(GamblingLess:遏制冲动)的智能手机即时干预应用:单臂可接受性和可行性试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Mar 26;23(3):e25786. doi: 10.2196/25786.
7
An Ecological Momentary Intervention for weight loss and healthy eating via smartphone and Internet: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.一项通过智能手机和互联网进行减肥与健康饮食的生态瞬时干预:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2016 Mar 22;17:154. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1280-x.
8
Smartphone-based Ecological Momentary Intervention for secondary prevention of suicidal thoughts and behaviour: protocol for the SmartCrisis V.2.0 randomised clinical trial.基于智能手机的生态瞬时干预用于自杀意念和行为的二级预防:SmartCrisis V.2.0 随机临床试验方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Sep 20;12(9):e051807. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051807.
9
Capturing Everyday Parental Feeding Practices and Eating Behaviors of 3- to 5-Year-Old Children With Avid Eating Behavior: Ecological Momentary Assessment Feasibility and Acceptability Study.捕捉有强烈进食行为的3至5岁儿童的日常父母喂养行为和饮食行为:生态瞬时评估的可行性和可接受性研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Feb 27;9:e66807. doi: 10.2196/66807.
10
It's craving time: time of day effects on momentary hunger and food craving in daily life.到了想吃东西的时候了:日常生活中一天中的时间对即时饥饿和食物渴望的影响。
Nutrition. 2018 Nov;55-56:15-20. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2018.03.048. Epub 2018 Apr 6.

本文引用的文献

1
Food approach dynamics in daily life: Speed and force of food approach movements fluctuate with hunger, but less so for people with high BMI.日常生活中的食物接近动力学:食物接近运动的速度和力度随饥饿而波动,但对于 BMI 较高的人来说,这种波动较小。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2023 Aug;152(8):2300-2317. doi: 10.1037/xge0001386. Epub 2023 May 11.
2
Efficacy of a food response and attention training treatment for obesity: A randomized placebo controlled trial.食物反应和注意力训练治疗肥胖的疗效:一项随机安慰剂对照试验。
Behav Res Ther. 2022 Nov;158:104183. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2022.104183. Epub 2022 Aug 29.
3
Test-retest reliability of a smartphone-based approach-avoidance task: Effects of retest period, stimulus type, and demographics.
基于智能手机的趋近-回避任务的重测信度:重测时间、刺激类型和人口统计学因素的影响。
Behav Res Methods. 2023 Aug;55(5):2652-2668. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-01920-6. Epub 2022 Aug 1.
4
App-based food-specific inhibitory control training as an adjunct to treatment as usual in binge-type eating disorders: A feasibility trial.基于应用程序的食物特异性抑制控制训练作为暴食型饮食障碍常规治疗的辅助手段:一项可行性试验。
Appetite. 2022 Jan 1;168:105788. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105788. Epub 2021 Oct 30.
5
The evidential value of research on cognitive training to change food-related biases and unhealthy eating behavior: A systematic review and p-curve analysis.认知训练对改变与食物相关的偏见和不良饮食习惯的研究的证据价值:系统评价和 p 曲线分析。
Obes Rev. 2021 Dec;22(12):e13338. doi: 10.1111/obr.13338. Epub 2021 Oct 6.
6
Too hot to handle: Mood states moderate implicit approach vs. avoidance tendencies toward food cues in patients with obesity and active binge eating disorder.难以应对的高温:情绪状态调节肥胖症和暴食症患者对食物线索的内隐趋近与回避倾向。
J Psychiatr Res. 2021 Nov;143:302-308. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2021.09.031. Epub 2021 Sep 10.
7
Measuring Implicit Approach-Avoidance Tendencies towards Food Using a Mobile Phone outside the Lab.在实验室外使用手机测量对食物的内隐趋近-回避倾向。
Foods. 2021 Jun 22;10(7):1440. doi: 10.3390/foods10071440.
8
App-based food Go/No-Go training: User engagement and dietary intake in an opportunistic observational study.基于应用程序的食物“去/不去”训练:一项机会性观察研究中的用户参与度和饮食摄入量
Appetite. 2021 Oct 1;165:105315. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105315. Epub 2021 May 17.
9
Comparison of different response devices to assess behavioral tendencies towards chocolate in the approach-avoidance task.比较不同的反应装置,以评估在趋近-回避任务中对巧克力的行为倾向。
Appetite. 2021 Oct 1;165:105294. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105294. Epub 2021 May 12.
10
How can food choice best be trained? Approach-avoidance versus go/no-go training.如何最好地培养食物选择?趋近回避与趋近-回避训练。
Appetite. 2021 Aug 1;163:105226. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105226. Epub 2021 Mar 23.