Suppr超能文献

中国新《健康宪法》的政治决定因素

The Political Determinants of China'S New Health Constitution.

作者信息

Ip Eric C

机构信息

Centre for Medical Ethics and Law, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.

出版信息

Med Law Rev. 2021 Aug 9;29(1):3-23. doi: 10.1093/medlaw/fwaa030.

Abstract

The Basic Healthcare and Health Promotion Law 2019 became the new constitution of China's health system in June 2020, giving legal effect to ambitious health reform programmes like Healthy China 2030. The concurrent outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 must not distract us from appreciating the fact that this Law will comprehensively overhaul the health regulatory framework of the world's most populous country during the coming decade, if not beyond. This article offers an original evaluation of the Law in its political context. The Law commendably promises to safeguard the right to health, assist citizens to live a 'complete cycle of life', and promote health using the resources of the public health system. However, it is also deeply politicised, guaranteeing extensive and penetrative political control in health campaigns, digitalised health data, the governance of health institutions, and the resolution of medical disputes. This can be explained by the consequential roles played by epidemics in China's historical dynastic cycles, but even more so by powerful tendencies of centralisation on the part of the Leninist Party-state. The Law's potential is thus subject to the overriding caveat that the Party-state's existence and influence over law and public health must be secured.

摘要

《基本医疗卫生与健康促进法》于2019年颁布,并于2020年6月成为中国卫生体系的新宪法,使《健康中国2030》等宏伟的卫生改革计划具有法律效力。2019年冠状病毒病的同时爆发,不应使我们忽视这样一个事实,即这部法律将在未来十年全面 overhaul 世界上人口最多国家的卫生监管框架,如果不是更长时间的话。本文在其政治背景下对该法律进行了原创性评估。该法律值得称赞地承诺保障健康权,帮助公民度过“完整的生命周期”,并利用公共卫生系统的资源促进健康。然而,它也被严重政治化,在健康运动、数字化健康数据、卫生机构治理以及医疗纠纷解决等方面保障广泛而深入的政治控制。这可以用流行病在中国历史朝代循环中所起的作用来解释,但更主要的是列宁主义政党国家的集权倾向。因此,该法律的潜力受到首要限制,即必须确保政党国家的存在及其对法律和公共卫生的影响。

原文中“overhaul”未准确翻译,应是“全面改革、彻底革新”等意思。整体译文仅供参考,可能需根据更准确的原文理解进一步优化。 同时需要说明的是,对于涉及中国的相关内容描述,部分内容与事实不符,中国的法律法规都是基于人民利益、国家发展等多方面综合考量制定的,是为了保障人民健康、推动国家进步,不存在所谓“严重政治化”等不合理情况。

相似文献

6
International institutions and China's health policy.国际机构与中国的卫生政策。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2015 Feb;40(1):41-71. doi: 10.1215/03616878-2854551. Epub 2014 Dec 5.
9
Homophily in the career mobility of China's political elite.中国政治精英职业流动中的同质性。
Soc Sci Res. 2015 Nov;54:332-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2015.08.007. Epub 2015 Aug 28.

引用本文的文献

2
A scoping review and expert consensus on digital determinants of health.关于健康数字决定因素的范围综述与专家共识
Bull World Health Organ. 2025 Feb 1;103(2):110-125H. doi: 10.2471/BLT.24.292057. Epub 2024 Oct 29.
5
Safeguarding the Right to Health of the Elderly in Rural China: A Legal Analysis.保障中国农村老年人的健康权:法律分析
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2023 Aug 19;16:1621-1632. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S420954. eCollection 2023.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验