• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Political determinants of digital health: beyond the rainbow.数字健康的政治决定因素:超越彩虹
Health Promot Int. 2025 Mar 5;40(2). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daaf014.
2
A scoping review and expert consensus on digital determinants of health.关于健康数字决定因素的范围综述与专家共识
Bull World Health Organ. 2025 Feb 1;103(2):110-125H. doi: 10.2471/BLT.24.292057. Epub 2024 Oct 29.
3
Digital Is Political: Why We Need a Feminist Conceptual Lens on Determinants of Digital Health.数字即政治:为何我们需要以女性主义视角看待数字健康的决定因素。
OMICS. 2021 Apr;25(4):249-254. doi: 10.1089/omi.2021.0020. Epub 2021 Apr 1.
4
Global health governance - the next political revolution.全球卫生治理——下一场政治革命。
Public Health. 2015 Jul;129(7):838-42. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2015.04.014. Epub 2015 May 31.
5
Non-communicable disease governance in the era of the sustainable development goals: a qualitative analysis of food industry framing in WHO consultations.可持续发展目标时代的非传染性疾病治理:世卫组织磋商中食品行业框架的定性分析。
Global Health. 2020 Aug 26;16(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s12992-020-00611-1.
6
Political and Governance Challenges to Achieving Global HIV Goals with Injecting Drug Users: The Case of Pakistan.实现全球艾滋病毒目标面临的政治和治理挑战:以巴基斯坦为例。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2019 May 1;8(5):261-271. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2018.131.
7
Towards Preventing and Managing Conflict of Interest in Nutrition Policy? An Analysis of Submissions to a Consultation on a Draft WHO Tool.迈向预防和管理营养政策中的利益冲突?对世卫组织一份工具草案咨询意见提交材料的分析。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2021 Mar 15;10(5):255-265. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2020.52.
8
Re-politicizing the WHO's social determinants of health framework.重新政治化世界卫生组织的健康社会决定因素框架。
Health Promot Int. 2024 Oct 1;39(5). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daae122.
9
The importance of prioritizing politics in Good Governance for Medicines Initiative in Zimbabwe: a qualitative policy analysis study.优先考虑政治在津巴布韦药品治理倡议良好治理中的重要性:一项定性政策分析研究。
Health Policy Plan. 2022 May 12;37(5):634-643. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czac007.
10
Power asymmetries in global governance for health: a conceptual framework for analyzing the political-economic determinants of health inequities.全球卫生治理中的权力不对称:分析健康不平等的政治经济决定因素的概念框架。
Global Health. 2019 Nov 28;15(Suppl 1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12992-019-0516-4.

本文引用的文献

1
The Digital Transformation and the Right to Health of Young Adults in Bangladesh and Colombia: A Community-Engaged Study.孟加拉国和哥伦比亚青年成年人的数字转型与健康权:一项社区参与研究。
Health Hum Rights. 2024 Dec;26(2):45-60.
2
Digital rights and mobile health in Southeast Asia: A scoping review.东南亚的数字权利与移动健康:一项范围综述。
Digit Health. 2024 May 28;10:20552076241257058. doi: 10.1177/20552076241257058. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
3
Colonialism in the new digital health agenda.新数字健康议程中的殖民主义。
BMJ Glob Health. 2024 Feb 27;9(2):e014131. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-014131.
4
Barriers to and facilitators of online health information-seeking behaviours among cancer patients: A systematic review.癌症患者在线寻求健康信息行为的障碍与促进因素:一项系统综述
Digit Health. 2023 Dec 15;9:20552076231210663. doi: 10.1177/20552076231210663. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
5
Determinants of government spending on primary healthcare: a global data analysis.影响政府基层医疗支出的因素:全球数据分析。
BMJ Glob Health. 2023 Nov 30;8(11):e012562. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-012562.
6
Digital determinants of health: Editorial.健康的数字决定因素:社论
PLOS Digit Health. 2023 Nov 28;2(11):e0000373. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000373. eCollection 2023 Nov.
7
Going beyond the means: Exploring the role of bias from digital determinants of health in technologies.超越手段:探索健康数字决定因素中的偏见在技术中的作用。
PLOS Digit Health. 2023 Oct 12;2(10):e0000244. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000244. eCollection 2023 Oct.
8
Towards anti-racist policies and strategies to reduce poor health outcomes in racialised communities: introducing the O'Neill-Lancet Commission on Racism, Structural Discrimination, and Global Health.迈向减少种族化社区不良健康结果的反种族主义政策与策略:介绍奥尼尔-《柳叶刀》种族主义、结构性歧视与全球健康委员会
Lancet. 2023 Jun 3;401(10391):1834-1836. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00910-8. Epub 2023 May 18.
9
Digital health and human rights of young adults in Ghana, Kenya and Vietnam: a qualitative participatory action research study.加纳、肯尼亚和越南的年轻成年人的数字健康与人权:一项定性参与式行动研究。
BMJ Glob Health. 2023 May;8(5). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-011254.
10
Is the uptake, engagement, and effectiveness of exclusively mobile interventions for the promotion of weight-related behaviors equal for all? A systematic review.仅通过移动设备进行的促进体重相关行为干预的接受度、参与度和有效性对所有人来说都一样吗?一项系统综述。
Obes Rev. 2023 Mar;24(3):e13542. doi: 10.1111/obr.13542. Epub 2023 Jan 9.

数字健康的政治决定因素:超越彩虹

Political determinants of digital health: beyond the rainbow.

作者信息

Davis Sara L M

机构信息

Centre for Interdisciplinary Methodologies, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Health Promot Int. 2025 Mar 5;40(2). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daaf014.

DOI:10.1093/heapro/daaf014
PMID:40177937
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11966192/
Abstract

In 2021, the World Health Organization issued its first global strategy on digital technologies and health, calling on member states to develop their own national digital health strategies. However, the normative tools that guide the development of these strategies do not prompt member states to consider how broader political factors, such as law and policy, governance, and civic engagement, could shape health outcomes in the digital age. The digital gender divide, algorithmic biases linked to race, transnational private sector actors, and more must be thoroughly addressed in future digital health strategies. Experiences from the global HIV response have demonstrated that it is possible to do this, by mobilizing diverse government and non-governmental actors to systematically assess and act to strengthen the legal and political environment for health. This essay draws on the HIV response to critically engage with recent literature on the digital determinants of health, proposing an approach to analyzing broader political determinants of health, including commercial determinants of health, and other laws, policies, governance, and civic engagement relevant to digital health strategies. By rendering visible the role of politics, governance, and civic engagement in digital health, strategies can be tools to mobilize broad collaborations and advocacy that creates an enabling environment.

摘要

2021年,世界卫生组织发布了其首份关于数字技术与健康的全球战略,呼吁各成员国制定各自的国家数字健康战略。然而,指导这些战略制定的规范性工具并未促使成员国考虑更广泛的政治因素,如法律与政策、治理以及公民参与,这些因素如何在数字时代塑造健康结果。数字性别鸿沟、与种族相关的算法偏见、跨国私营部门行为体等等,在未来的数字健康战略中都必须得到彻底解决。全球应对艾滋病的经验表明,通过动员不同的政府和非政府行为体系统地评估并采取行动来加强健康方面的法律和政治环境,做到这一点是可能的。本文借鉴应对艾滋病的经验,批判性地探讨近期关于健康数字决定因素的文献,提出一种分析健康更广泛政治决定因素的方法,包括健康的商业决定因素,以及与数字健康战略相关的其他法律、政策、治理和公民参与。通过揭示政治、治理和公民参与在数字健康中的作用,战略可以成为动员广泛合作与倡导的工具,从而创造有利环境。