• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社交距离对新冠疫情进程有何影响?

[What is the effect of social distancing on the course of COVID-19 epidemic?].

作者信息

Lewtak Katarzyna, Nitsch-Osuch Aneta

机构信息

Department of Social Medicine and Public Health, Medical University of Warsaw, Faculty of Medicine, Warsaw, Poland.

出版信息

Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2021 Feb 24;49(289):71-79.

PMID:33713099
Abstract

COVID-19 pandemic challenged both public health specialists and authorities to implement non-pharmaceutical interventions aimed at limiting the spread of SARS-CoV-2 infections. The concept of social distancing is about limiting contacts between people, which breaks virus transmission chains, delays the increase in the number of infected people in the population and prevents overloading of health care systems. Many countries, including Poland, implemented a number of interventions aimed at limiting the number of infections and slowing down the tempo of the pandemic's spread. These are, among others, mass-scale testing, isolation of infected individuals, hand hygiene, breath etiquette and wearing mascs. Apart from these, a number of restrictions were enforced to ensure social distancing, such as closing down schools and universities, forbidding organising large parties and mass gatherings, limiting travels and use of public transport, increasing awareness of the public opinion on the necessity to stay at home, up to even introducing full lockdown with only the right to go out to buy food and medication or use the health care system. These interventions were gradually introduced in particular countries, in different ways, to a greater or lesser extent. Their effectiveness is largely influenced by the socio-economic and cultural factors, the nature of political and healthcare systems as well as the operating procedures used during their implementation. The implemented social distancing strategies prove to be effective, especially when combined with such actions as mass-scale testing, tracking contact chains, isolation and quarantine. The current work aims at making an overview of selected social distancing strategies and assessing their effectiveness in slowing down COVID-19 epidemic.

摘要

新冠疫情对公共卫生专家和当局都构成了挑战,促使他们实施旨在限制严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)感染传播的非药物干预措施。社交距离的概念是限制人与人之间的接触,这会打破病毒传播链,延缓人群中感染人数的增加,并防止医疗系统不堪重负。包括波兰在内的许多国家实施了一系列旨在限制感染数量和减缓疫情传播速度的干预措施。其中包括大规模检测、隔离感染者、手部卫生、呼吸礼仪和佩戴口罩。除此之外,还实施了一些限制措施以确保社交距离,例如关闭中小学和大学、禁止组织大型派对和群众集会、限制出行和公共交通的使用、提高公众对居家必要性的认识,甚至实施全面封锁,只允许外出购买食品和药品或使用医疗系统。这些干预措施在不同国家以不同方式、不同程度逐步推行。其有效性在很大程度上受到社会经济和文化因素、政治和医疗系统的性质以及实施过程中所采用的操作程序的影响。事实证明,所实施的社交距离策略是有效的,尤其是与大规模检测、追踪接触链、隔离和检疫等行动相结合时。当前的工作旨在概述选定的社交距离策略,并评估其在减缓新冠疫情方面的有效性。

相似文献

1
[What is the effect of social distancing on the course of COVID-19 epidemic?].社交距离对新冠疫情进程有何影响?
Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2021 Feb 24;49(289):71-79.
2
Spring in London with Covid-19: a personal view.伦敦新冠疫情下的春天:个人视角
Med Leg J. 2020 Jul;88(2):57-64. doi: 10.1177/0025817220923692. Epub 2020 Jun 9.
3
Public Health Interventions to Mitigate Early Spread of SARS-CoV-2 in Poland.公共卫生干预措施以减缓 SARS-CoV-2 在波兰的早期传播。
Med Sci Monit. 2020 Apr 13;26:e924730. doi: 10.12659/MSM.924730.
4
Estimating the effect of non-pharmaceutical interventions to mitigate COVID-19 spread in Saudi Arabia.估计非药物干预措施对减轻沙特阿拉伯 COVID-19 传播的影响。
BMC Med. 2022 Feb 7;20(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12916-022-02232-4.
5
Low-impact social distancing interventions to mitigate local epidemics of SARS-CoV-2.低影响社会疏离干预措施以减轻 SARS-CoV-2 的局部流行。
Microbes Infect. 2020 Nov-Dec;22(10):611-616. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2020.09.006. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
6
Effectiveness of different types and levels of social distancing measures: a scoping review of global evidence from earlier stage of COVID-19 pandemic.不同类型和级别的社交隔离措施的效果:COVID-19 大流行早期全球证据的范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 11;12(4):e053938. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053938.
7
Social distancing measures in the fight against COVID-19 in Brazil: description and epidemiological analysis by state.巴西抗击 COVID-19 中的社交距离措施:按州描述和流行病学分析。
Cad Saude Publica. 2020 Sep 18;36(9):e00185020. doi: 10.1590/0102-311X00185020. eCollection 2020.
8
Effectiveness of non-pharmaceutical public health interventions against COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis.非药物公共卫生干预措施对 COVID-19 的有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 23;16(11):e0260371. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260371. eCollection 2021.
9
Effectiveness of social distancing measures and lockdowns for reducing transmission of COVID-19 in non-healthcare, community-based settings.社交距离措施和封锁措施在减少非医疗、社区环境中的 COVID-19 传播方面的效果。
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2023 Oct 9;381(2257):20230132. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2023.0132. Epub 2023 Aug 23.
10
Did social isolation during the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic have an impact on the lifestyles of citizens?在 SARS-CoV-2 疫情期间,社交隔离是否对公民的生活方式产生了影响?
Epidemiol Prev. 2020 Sep-Dec;44(5-6 Suppl 2):353-362. doi: 10.19191/EP20.5-6.S2.137.

引用本文的文献

1
Was it really different? COVID-19-pandemic period in long-term recreation monitoring - A case study from Polish forests.它真的有所不同吗?长期休闲监测中的新冠疫情时期——来自波兰森林的案例研究。
J Outdoor Recreat Tour. 2023 Mar;41:100495. doi: 10.1016/j.jort.2022.100495. Epub 2022 Feb 28.