• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

低影响社会疏离干预措施以减轻 SARS-CoV-2 的局部流行。

Low-impact social distancing interventions to mitigate local epidemics of SARS-CoV-2.

机构信息

Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, 1730 Minor Ave Suite 1600, Seattle, WA, USA.

出版信息

Microbes Infect. 2020 Nov-Dec;22(10):611-616. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2020.09.006. Epub 2020 Sep 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.micinf.2020.09.006
PMID:32977019
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7508051/
Abstract

Many jurisdictions implemented intensive social distancing to suppress SARS-CoV-2 transmission. The challenge now is to mitigate the ongoing COVID-19 epidemic without overburdening economic and social activities. An agent-based model simulated the population of King County, Washington. SARS-CoV-2 transmission probabilities were estimated by fitting simulated to observed hospital admissions. Interventions considered included encouraging telecommuting, reducing contacts to high-risk persons, and reductions to contacts outside of the home, among others. Removing all existing interventions would result in nearly 42,000 COVID-19 hospitalizations between June 2020 and January 2021, with peak hospital occupancy exceeding available beds 6-fold. Combining interventions is predicted to reduce total hospitalizations by 48% (95% CI, 47-49%), with peak COVID-19 hospital occupancy of 70% of total beds. Targeted school closures can further reduce the peak occupancy. Combining low-impact interventions may mitigate the course of the COVID-19 epidemic, keeping hospital burden within the capacity of the healthcare system.

摘要

许多司法管辖区实施了严格的社交距离措施,以抑制 SARS-CoV-2 的传播。现在的挑战是在不使经济和社会活动负担过重的情况下,减轻正在发生的 COVID-19 疫情。基于代理的模型模拟了华盛顿州金县的人口。通过将模拟数据与实际住院数据进行拟合,估计了 SARS-CoV-2 的传播概率。所考虑的干预措施包括鼓励远程办公、减少与高风险人群的接触以及减少家庭以外的接触等。取消所有现有的干预措施,将导致 2020 年 6 月至 2021 年 1 月期间近 42000 例 COVID-19 住院治疗,医院入住率峰值超过可用床位的 6 倍。预测组合干预措施可将总住院人数减少 48%(95%CI,47-49%),COVID-19 医院入住率峰值为总床位的 70%。有针对性的学校关闭可以进一步降低峰值入住率。低影响干预措施的结合可能会减轻 COVID-19 疫情的进程,使医院负担保持在医疗系统的承受能力之内。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa1c/7508051/36676fb8447c/gr4_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa1c/7508051/62dbe1a1e1f0/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa1c/7508051/733cc26e60bc/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa1c/7508051/199d3822cc9b/gr3_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa1c/7508051/36676fb8447c/gr4_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa1c/7508051/62dbe1a1e1f0/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa1c/7508051/733cc26e60bc/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa1c/7508051/199d3822cc9b/gr3_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa1c/7508051/36676fb8447c/gr4_lrg.jpg

相似文献

1
Low-impact social distancing interventions to mitigate local epidemics of SARS-CoV-2.低影响社会疏离干预措施以减轻 SARS-CoV-2 的局部流行。
Microbes Infect. 2020 Nov-Dec;22(10):611-616. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2020.09.006. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
2
Forecasting the effect of social distancing on COVID-19 autumn-winter outbreak in the metropolitan area of Buenos Aires.预测社交距离措施对布宜诺斯艾利斯大都市区新冠疫情秋冬爆发的影响。
Medicina (B Aires). 2020;80 Suppl 3:7-15.
3
Dynamic interplay between social distancing duration and intensity in reducing COVID-19 US hospitalizations: A "law of diminishing returns".社交距离持续时间和强度对降低美国 COVID-19 住院率的动态相互作用:收益递减规律。
Chaos. 2020 Jul;30(7):071102. doi: 10.1063/5.0013871.
4
Community interventions in Low-And Middle-Income Countries to inform COVID-19 control implementation decisions in Kenya: A rapid systematic review.社区干预在中低收入国家为肯尼亚的 COVID-19 控制实施决策提供信息:一项快速系统评价。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 8;15(12):e0242403. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242403. eCollection 2020.
5
Mathematical assessment of the impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions on curtailing the 2019 novel Coronavirus.数学评估非药物干预措施对遏制 2019 年新型冠状病毒的影响。
Math Biosci. 2020 Jul;325:108364. doi: 10.1016/j.mbs.2020.108364. Epub 2020 May 1.
6
Weathering COVID-19 storm: Successful control measures of five Asian countries.应对新冠疫情风暴:五个亚洲国家成功的防控措施。
Am J Infect Control. 2020 Jul;48(7):851-852. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2020.04.021. Epub 2020 Apr 29.
7
Initial Assessment of the Impact of the Emergency State Lockdown Measures on the 1st Wave of the COVID-19 Epidemic in Portugal.紧急状态封锁措施对葡萄牙第一波新冠疫情影响的初步评估
Acta Med Port. 2020 Nov 2;33(11):733-741. doi: 10.20344/amp.14129.
8
Public Health Interventions to Mitigate Early Spread of SARS-CoV-2 in Poland.公共卫生干预措施以减缓 SARS-CoV-2 在波兰的早期传播。
Med Sci Monit. 2020 Apr 13;26:e924730. doi: 10.12659/MSM.924730.
9
Pilot Investigation of SARS-CoV-2 Secondary Transmission in Kindergarten Through Grade 12 Schools Implementing Mitigation Strategies - St. Louis County and City of Springfield, Missouri, December 2020.密苏里州圣路易斯县和斯普林菲尔德市幼儿园至 12 年级学校实施缓解策略后对 SARS-CoV-2 二次传播的初步调查-密苏里州圣路易斯县和斯普林菲尔德市,2020 年 12 月。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021 Mar 26;70(12):449-455. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7012e4.
10
A "No More Waves" strategy for COVID-19 in Canada.加拿大针对新冠疫情的“不再有浪潮”策略。
CMAJ. 2021 Jan 25;193(4):E132-E134. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.202685. Epub 2020 Dec 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Economic Burden of COVID-19: A Systematic Review.新型冠状病毒肺炎的经济负担:一项系统综述
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2022 Apr 28;14:293-307. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S338225. eCollection 2022.
2
Impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions on SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks in English care homes: a modelling study.非药物干预措施对英国养老院中 SARS-CoV-2 爆发的影响:一项建模研究。
BMC Infect Dis. 2022 Apr 1;22(1):324. doi: 10.1186/s12879-022-07268-8.
3
Estimating the impact of interventions against COVID-19: From lockdown to vaccination.估算 COVID-19 干预措施的影响:从封锁到疫苗接种。

本文引用的文献

1
Differential effects of intervention timing on COVID-19 spread in the United States.干预时机对美国 COVID-19 传播的影响差异。
Sci Adv. 2020 Dec 4;6(49). doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abd6370. Print 2020 Dec.
2
Clinical features, diagnostics, and outcomes of patients presenting with acute respiratory illness: A retrospective cohort study of patients with and without COVID-19.急性呼吸道疾病患者的临床特征、诊断方法及转归:一项针对感染和未感染新冠病毒患者的回顾性队列研究
EClinicalMedicine. 2020 Oct;27:100518. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100518. Epub 2020 Aug 26.
3
Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Re-infection by a Phylogenetically Distinct Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Strain Confirmed by Whole Genome Sequencing.
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 17;16(12):e0261330. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261330. eCollection 2021.
4
Non-pharmacological measures implemented in the setting of long-term care facilities to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infections and their consequences: a rapid review.长期护理机构中实施的非药物措施以预防 SARS-CoV-2 感染及其后果:快速综述。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 15;9(9):CD015085. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015085.pub2.
5
Measures implemented in the school setting to contain the COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review.学校为遏制新冠疫情而采取的措施:一项范围综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Dec 17;12(12):CD013812. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013812.
6
Modeling latent infection transmissions through biosocial stochastic dynamics.通过生物社会随机动力学对潜在感染传播进行建模。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 23;15(10):e0241163. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241163. eCollection 2020.
2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)通过全基因组测序确认为与严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2 株系不同的病毒再次感染。
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Nov 2;73(9):e2946-e2951. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1275.
4
Neutralizing Antibodies Correlate with Protection from SARS-CoV-2 in Humans during a Fishery Vessel Outbreak with a High Attack Rate.中和抗体与高感染率渔业船舶暴发期间人类免受 SARS-CoV-2 感染相关。
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Oct 21;58(11). doi: 10.1128/JCM.02107-20.
5
Adoption and impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions for COVID-19.新冠疫情非药物干预措施的采用情况及影响
Wellcome Open Res. 2020 Apr 2;5:59. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15808.1. eCollection 2020.
6
Estimating the effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 in Europe.估算非药物干预措施对欧洲 COVID-19 疫情的影响。
Nature. 2020 Aug;584(7820):257-261. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2405-7. Epub 2020 Jun 8.
7
Features of 20 133 UK patients in hospital with covid-19 using the ISARIC WHO Clinical Characterisation Protocol: prospective observational cohort study.使用 ISARIC WHO 临床特征协议住院的 20133 例英国新冠患者的特征:前瞻性观察队列研究。
BMJ. 2020 May 22;369:m1985. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m1985.
8
Incidence, clinical outcomes, and transmission dynamics of severe coronavirus disease 2019 in California and Washington: prospective cohort study.加利福尼亚州和华盛顿州严重 2019 冠状病毒病的发病率、临床结局和传播动态:前瞻性队列研究。
BMJ. 2020 May 22;369:m1923. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m1923.
9
Mathematical assessment of the impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions on curtailing the 2019 novel Coronavirus.数学评估非药物干预措施对遏制 2019 年新型冠状病毒的影响。
Math Biosci. 2020 Jul;325:108364. doi: 10.1016/j.mbs.2020.108364. Epub 2020 May 1.
10
Epidemiology and transmission of COVID-19 in 391 cases and 1286 of their close contacts in Shenzhen, China: a retrospective cohort study.中国深圳 391 例病例及其 1286 名密切接触者的 COVID-19 流行病学和传播:一项回顾性队列研究。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Aug;20(8):911-919. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30287-5. Epub 2020 Apr 27.