Azar Denise, Murphy Michael, Fishman Alana, Sewell Lauren, Barnes Megan, Proposch Amanda
Gippsland Primary Health Network, Traralgon, VIC, Australia.
Michael Murphy Research, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Health Promot J Austr. 2022 Jan;33(1):272-281. doi: 10.1002/hpja.478. Epub 2021 Mar 27.
Population cancer screening rates are around 50% for the general population and even lower in rural areas. This study aimed to explore knowledge, attitudes, behaviours, motivators and barriers to breast, bowel and cervical screening participation in under-screened men and women.
We used a qualitative research design. Focus groups were segmented by age, sex and screening participation. Participants were under-screened in at least one of the cancer screening programs, with separate groups for each of the programs. The discussion guides were designed around the Health Belief Model and group discussions were coded using a thematic content analysis approach.
Fourteen focus groups were held with 80 participants. Key themes were that the concept of cancer screening was not well understood, a low priority for preventive health behaviours, issues relating to local general practitioners (GP) and screening was unpleasant, embarrassing and/or inconvenient. A key determinant of participation in cancer screening was exposure to prompts to action, and it was evident that participants often required multiple prompts before they took action.
Opportunities that develop attitudes to health that place disease prevention as a high priority; improve understanding of the benefit of screening in terms of early detection and treatment; improve GP availability and the patient-practitioner relationship; and the development of messages for each of the screening programs should be further explored as factors that may influence rural population screening rates. SO WHAT?: Addressing health attitudes, beliefs, knowledge, health practitioner and test-related barriers and improving messaging may increase cancer screening participation in under-screened rural populations.
普通人群的癌症筛查率约为50%,农村地区甚至更低。本研究旨在探索筛查率较低的男性和女性参与乳腺癌、肠癌和宫颈癌筛查的知识、态度、行为、动机及障碍。
我们采用定性研究设计。焦点小组按年龄、性别和筛查参与情况进行划分。参与者至少在一项癌症筛查项目中筛查率较低,每个项目单独分组。讨论指南围绕健康信念模型设计,小组讨论采用主题内容分析法进行编码。
共举办了14个焦点小组,有80名参与者。关键主题包括对癌症筛查概念理解不足、预防性健康行为优先级低、与当地全科医生相关的问题以及筛查令人不适、尴尬和/或不便。参与癌症筛查的一个关键决定因素是受到行动提示,显然参与者在采取行动前通常需要多次提示。
应进一步探索培养将疾病预防列为高度优先事项的健康态度的机会;提高对筛查在早期发现和治疗方面益处的理解;改善全科医生的可及性及医患关系;以及为每个筛查项目制定宣传信息,这些因素可能会影响农村人口的筛查率。那又如何?解决健康态度、信念、知识、医疗从业者及检测相关的障碍并改善宣传信息,可能会提高筛查率较低的农村人口的癌症筛查参与度。