• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用机器学习预测分娩第二阶段的严重不良新生儿结局:一项回顾性队列研究。

Prediction of severe adverse neonatal outcomes at the second stage of labour using machine learning: a retrospective cohort study.

机构信息

The Mina and Everard Goodman Faculty of Life Sciences, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hadassah Medical Organization and Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.

出版信息

BJOG. 2021 Oct;128(11):1824-1832. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16700. Epub 2021 Apr 15.

DOI:10.1111/1471-0528.16700
PMID:33713380
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To create a personalised machine learning model for prediction of severe adverse neonatal outcomes (SANO) during the second stage of labour.

DESIGN

Retrospective Electronic-Medical-Record (EMR) -based study.

POPULATION

A cohort of 73 868 singleton, term deliveries that reached the second stage of labour, including 1346 (1.8%) deliveries with SANO.

METHODS

A gradient boosting model was created, analysing 21 million data points from antepartum features (e.g. gravidity and parity) gathered at admission to the delivery unit, and intrapartum data (e.g. cervical dilatation and effacement) gathered during the first stage of labour. Deliveries were allocated to high-risk and low-risk groups based on the Youden index to maximise sensitivity and specificity.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

SANO was defined as either umbilical cord pH levels ≤7.1 or 1-minute or 5-minute Apgar score ≤7.

RESULTS

The model for prediction of SANO yielded an area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) of 0.761 (95% CI 0.748-0.774). A third of the cohort (33.5%, n = 24 721) were allocated to a high-risk group for SANO, which captured up to 72.1% of these cases (odds ratio 5.3, 95% CI 4.7-6.0; high-risk versus low-risk groups).

CONCLUSIONS

Data acquired throughout the first stage of labour can be used to predict SANO during the second stage of labour using a machine learning model. Stratifying parturients at the beginning of the second stage of labour in a 'time out' session, can direct a personalised approach to management of this challenging aspect of labour, as well as improve allocation of staff and resources.

TWEETABLE ABSTRACT

Personalised prediction score for severe adverse neonatal outcomes in labour using machine learning model.

摘要

目的

建立预测分娩第二产程严重新生儿不良结局(SANO)的个体化机器学习模型。

设计

基于回顾性电子病历(EMR)的研究。

人群

纳入 73868 例单胎足月分娩且进入第二产程的产妇队列,其中 1346 例(1.8%)发生 SANO。

方法

构建梯度提升模型,分析入院时采集的产前特征(如孕次和产次)和第一产程采集的产时数据(如宫颈扩张和消失程度)的 2100 万个数据点。根据约登指数将分娩分配到高危和低危组,以最大限度地提高敏感性和特异性。

主要观察指标

SANO 定义为脐动脉 pH 值≤7.1 或 1 分钟和 5 分钟 Apgar 评分≤7。

结果

SANO 预测模型的受试者工作特征曲线下面积为 0.761(95%CI 0.748-0.774)。三分之一的队列(33.5%,n=24721)被分配到 SANO 的高危组,该组捕获了高达 72.1%的病例(优势比 5.3,95%CI 4.7-6.0;高危组与低危组)。

结论

使用机器学习模型可以从第一产程采集的数据中预测第二产程的 SANO。在第二产程开始时进行“暂停”,对产妇进行分层,可以针对分娩的这一具有挑战性的方面采取个性化的管理方法,并改善人员和资源的分配。

推特摘要

使用机器学习模型预测分娩中严重新生儿不良结局的个体化预测评分。

相似文献

1
Prediction of severe adverse neonatal outcomes at the second stage of labour using machine learning: a retrospective cohort study.利用机器学习预测分娩第二阶段的严重不良新生儿结局:一项回顾性队列研究。
BJOG. 2021 Oct;128(11):1824-1832. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16700. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
2
Real-time data analysis using a machine learning model significantly improves prediction of successful vaginal deliveries.使用机器学习模型进行实时数据分析可显著提高阴道分娩成功的预测能力。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Sep;223(3):437.e1-437.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.05.025. Epub 2020 May 17.
3
Pushing/bearing down methods for the second stage of labour.第二产程的屏气/用力方法
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Oct 9(10):CD009124. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009124.pub2.
4
Cervical dilatation over time is a poor predictor of severe adverse birth outcomes: a diagnostic accuracy study.随着时间的推移,宫颈扩张对严重不良分娩结局的预测效果较差:一项诊断准确性研究。
BJOG. 2018 Jul;125(8):991-1000. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15205. Epub 2018 Apr 17.
5
Applying Automated Machine Learning to Predict Mode of Delivery Using Ongoing Intrapartum Data in Laboring Patients.应用自动化机器学习预测临产患者产程中数据的分娩方式。
Am J Perinatol. 2024 May;41(S 01):e412-e419. doi: 10.1055/a-1885-1697. Epub 2022 Jun 25.
6
Pushing/bearing down methods for the second stage of labour.第二产程的屏气/用力方法
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 26;3(3):CD009124. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009124.pub3.
7
Prolonged second stage of labour increases maternal morbidity but not neonatal morbidity.产程第二产程延长会增加产妇发病率,但不会增加新生儿发病率。
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2019 Aug;59(4):555-560. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12935. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
8
Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes in Hospital-Based Deliveries With Water Immersion.水中分娩的母婴结局。
Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Oct;136(4):707-715. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003956.
9
The impact of nurses' and physicians' shift change on obstetrical outcomes.护士和医师交接班对产科结局的影响。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021 Mar;303(3):653-658. doi: 10.1007/s00404-020-05773-2. Epub 2020 Sep 4.
10
Upright versus lying down position in second stage of labour in nulliparous women with low dose epidural: BUMPES randomised controlled trial.低剂量硬膜外麻醉下初产妇第二产程中直立位与卧位的比较:BUMPES随机对照试验
BMJ. 2017 Oct 18;359:j4471. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j4471.

引用本文的文献

1
Evolving Frameworks for the Foundation and Practice of Electronic Fetal Monitoring.电子胎儿监护基础与实践的不断发展的框架
Matern Fetal Med. 2022 Apr 26;4(2):141-151. doi: 10.1097/FM9.0000000000000148. eCollection 2022 Apr.
2
Artificial intelligence-based prediction of second stage duration in labor: a multicenter retrospective cohort analysis.基于人工智能的产程第二阶段持续时间预测:一项多中心回顾性队列分析
EClinicalMedicine. 2025 Jan 20;80:103072. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103072. eCollection 2025 Feb.
3
Predicting vaginal delivery after labor induction using machine learning: Development of a multivariable prediction model.
使用机器学习预测引产术后的阴道分娩:多变量预测模型的开发
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2025 Jan;104(1):164-173. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14953. Epub 2024 Nov 27.
4
Editorial: Artificial intelligence and machine learning in pediatric surgery.社论:儿科手术中的人工智能与机器学习
Front Pediatr. 2024 Apr 9;12:1404600. doi: 10.3389/fped.2024.1404600. eCollection 2024.
5
Artificial intelligence in obstetrics.产科中的人工智能
Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2022 Mar;65(2):113-124. doi: 10.5468/ogs.21234. Epub 2021 Dec 15.