School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Logan campus, Australia.
School of Human Services and Social Work & Queensland Conservatorium Research Centre, Griffith University, Logan Campus, Australia.
Nurse Educ Today. 2021 May;100:104854. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.104854. Epub 2021 Mar 6.
There is growing evidence that non-Indigenous health students engage with cultural safety content in complex emotional ways. Identifying those emotions may contribute to transformative learning.
To develop and test a measure of student emotion using an approach that centres relevant theory and First Peoples' perspectives, values and lived realities.
This study used a descriptive, cohort design.
All health professional students enrolled in an undergraduate Australian First Peoples health course (n = 616) were invited to complete an online survey.
A staged approach to tool development included: (1) item generation; (2) response selection; (3) expert review; (4) pilot testing, and (5) psychometric testing of the 20-item draft tool. Tests included item analysis, principal components analysis with varimax rotation, subscale analysis, and internal reliability.
One hundred and nine surveys were analysed (17.7% response rate) predominantly from nursing and midwifery students (n = 96, 88.1%). Testing resulted in the development of the two-scaled Student Emotional Learning in Cultural Safety Instrument (SELCSI). The 12-item Witnessing scale revealed three factors explaining 62.17% of variance, and the 8-item Comfort scale had two factors explaining 67.62% of the variance. Cronbach's alpha showed good internal consistency (Witnessing scale α = 0.78; Comfort scale α = 0.88). There was a correlation between mean Witnessing (M = 50.06, SD 5.66) and Comfort (M = 32.44, SD 5.01) scores (r = 0.47, p < 0.001, 95% CI [0.304-0.643]).
The two scales of students' emotional learning were found to have preliminary validity and reliability. Use of the tool has important theoretical, pedagogical and methodological considerations for cultural safety in nursing and midwifery education. This tool may contribute to understanding how nursing and midwifery students learn to practice in culturally safe ways.
越来越多的证据表明,非土著健康专业学生以复杂的情感方式参与文化安全内容。识别这些情感可能有助于变革性学习。
使用以相关理论和第一民族的观点、价值观和现实生活为中心的方法,开发和测试一种衡量学生情绪的工具。
本研究采用描述性队列设计。
所有注册澳大利亚第一民族健康课程的健康专业学生(n=616)都被邀请完成在线调查。
工具开发的分阶段方法包括:(1)项目生成;(2)反应选择;(3)专家审查;(4)试点测试;(5)20 项草案工具的心理测试。测试包括项目分析、最大方差旋转的主成分分析、子量表分析和内部信度。
对 109 份调查进行了分析(17.7%的回复率),主要来自护理和助产专业的学生(n=96,88.1%)。测试结果开发了两个尺度的学生文化安全学习中的情感学习工具(SELCSI)。12 项目击量表揭示了三个因素,解释了 62.17%的方差,8 项舒适量表有两个因素,解释了 67.62%的方差。克朗巴赫的阿尔法表明具有良好的内部一致性(目击量表α=0.78;舒适量表α=0.88)。目击(M=50.06,SD 5.66)和舒适(M=32.44,SD 5.01)得分之间存在相关性(r=0.47,p<0.001,95%CI[0.304-0.643])。
发现学生情感学习的两个量表具有初步的有效性和可靠性。该工具的使用对护理和助产学教育中的文化安全具有重要的理论、教学和方法学意义。该工具可能有助于理解护理和助产学学生如何以文化安全的方式学习实践。