Suppr超能文献

对一项由原住民主导的、基于情感的教学干预措施进行评估,以促进本科非原住民健康专业学生的文化安全。

Evaluation of a First Peoples-led, emotion-based pedagogical intervention to promote cultural safety in undergraduate non-Indigenous health professional students.

作者信息

Mills Kyly, Creedy Debra K, Sunderland Naomi, Allen Jyai, Carter Amanda, Corporal Stephen

机构信息

School of Human Services & Social Work, Griffith University, Australia.

School of Nursing & Midwifery, Griffith University, Australia; Transforming Maternity Care Collaborative, Griffith University, Australia.

出版信息

Nurse Educ Today. 2022 Feb;109:105219. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105219. Epub 2021 Nov 14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Undergraduate health students learn cultural safety in complex and emotional ways. Pedagogies that account for these complexities must be developed and evaluated.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate a First Peoples-led emotion-based pedagogical intervention on non-Indigenous health professional students' development towards cultural safety.

DESIGN

A pre-post mixed-methods intervention design.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

All undergraduate health students undertaking a semester-long First Peoples cultural safety course (n = 395) were invited to participate.

METHODS

The intervention involved students' written reflections and comfort (1 = very uncomfortable to 5 = very comfortable) with workshop content, using a gawugaa-gii-mara (head, heart, hands) form. The educator analysed student responses collected on the form, to prompt discussion in a series of four workshops. Students also completed the online 20-item Student Emotional Learning in Cultural Safety Education Instrument (SELCSI) which has two scales, Witnessing and Comfort. gawugaa-gii-mara responses were thematically coded. Paired sample t-tests examined differences over time. Eta squared determined effect size.

RESULTS

There were 102 matched pre-post-intervention surveys. Both SELCSI scales had excellent internal consistency (Witnessing α = 0.80, Comfort α = 0.92). A statistically significant difference was observed between students' mean scores on the Witnessing scale prior to the course (M = 47.10, SD = 6.51) compared to post-course (53.04, SD = 4.80), t(95) = 8.70, p < 0.001 (two-tailed) with a large effect size (d = 0.88). Most Comfort scale items increased but were not statistically significant. Data from the gawugaa-gii-mara intervention (n = 162 written responses) revealed students were challenged by self-reflexivity. There was a disconnect between what students had learnt (gawugaa), what they had felt (gii) and how this would be applied in professional practice (mara).

CONCLUSIONS

The First Peoples-led, emotions-based pedagogical intervention was brief, meaningful and effective. As students grappled with their emotional connection to self-reflexivity as well as their ability to translate new knowledge into culturally safe practice, these offer important avenues for future research.

摘要

背景

本科健康专业学生以复杂且情绪化的方式学习文化安全。必须开发并评估能够应对这些复杂性的教学方法。

目的

评估一项由原住民主导的基于情感的教学干预对非原住民健康专业学生在文化安全方面发展的影响。

设计

一项前后测混合方法干预设计。

背景与参与者

邀请了所有参加为期一学期的原住民文化安全课程的本科健康专业学生(n = 395)参与。

方法

干预包括学生使用“gawugaa - gii - mara”(头、心、手)形式对工作坊内容进行书面反思和舒适度评分(1 = 非常不舒服至5 = 非常舒服)。教育工作者分析在该表格上收集的学生回复,以在一系列四个工作坊中引发讨论。学生们还完成了在线的20项文化安全教育中的学生情感学习量表(SELCSI),该量表有两个维度,即见证和舒适度。对“gawugaa - gii - mara”的回复进行主题编码。配对样本t检验用于检验随时间的差异。偏 eta 平方确定效应大小。

结果

有102份干预前后匹配的调查问卷。SELCSI的两个维度都具有出色的内部一致性(见证维度α = 0.80,舒适度维度α = 0.92)。与课程后(M = 53.04,SD = 4.80)相比,学生在课程前见证维度的平均得分(M = 47.10,SD = 6.51)存在统计学上的显著差异,t(95) = 8.70,p < 0.001(双侧),效应大小较大(d = 0.88)。大多数舒适度维度的项目有所增加,但无统计学显著性。来自“gawugaa - gii - mara”干预的数据(n = 162份书面回复)显示学生在自我反思方面受到挑战。学生所学内容(gawugaa)、所感(gii)与如何将其应用于专业实践(mara)之间存在脱节。

结论

由原住民主导的基于情感的教学干预简短、有意义且有效。由于学生努力应对他们与自我反思的情感联系以及将新知识转化为文化安全实践的能力,这些为未来研究提供了重要途径。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验