Suppr超能文献

自控:在药物流行病学中应用自我对照研究设计的 ISPE 认可指南。

Control yourself: ISPE-endorsed guidance in the application of self-controlled study designs in pharmacoepidemiology.

机构信息

Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2021 Jun;30(6):671-684. doi: 10.1002/pds.5227. Epub 2021 Apr 1.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Consensus is needed on conceptual foundations, terminology and relationships among the various self-controlled "trigger" study designs that control for time-invariant confounding factors and target the association between transient exposures (potential triggers) and abrupt outcomes. The International Society for Pharmacoepidemiology (ISPE) funded a working group of ISPE members to develop guidance material for the application and reporting of self-controlled study designs, similar to Standards of Reporting Observational Epidemiology (STROBE). This first paper focuses on navigation between the types of self-controlled designs to permit a foundational understanding with guiding principles.

METHODS

We leveraged a systematic review of applications of these designs, that we term Self-controlled Crossover Observational PharmacoEpidemiologic (SCOPE) studies. Starting from first principles and using case examples, we reviewed outcome-anchored (case-crossover [CCO], case-time control [CTC], case-case-time control [CCTC]) and exposure-anchored (self-controlled case-series [SCCS]) study designs.

RESULTS

Key methodological features related to exposure, outcome and time-related concerns were clarified, and a common language and worksheet to facilitate the design of SCOPE studies is introduced.

CONCLUSIONS

Consensus on conceptual foundations, terminology and relationships among SCOPE designs will facilitate understanding and critical appraisal of published studies, as well as help in the design, analysis and review of new SCOPE studies. This manuscript is endorsed by ISPE.

摘要

目的

需要就各种自我控制的“触发”研究设计的概念基础、术语和关系达成共识,这些设计可控制时间不变的混杂因素,并针对瞬时暴露(潜在触发因素)和突发结果之间的关联。国际药物流行病学学会(ISPE)资助了一个由 ISPE 成员组成的工作组,为自我控制研究设计的应用和报告制定指导材料,类似于观察性流行病学报告标准(STROBE)。本文首先关注各种自我控制设计之间的导航,以允许基于指导原则的基础理解。

方法

我们利用了对这些设计应用的系统评价,我们称之为自我控制交叉观察药物流行病学(SCOPE)研究。从基本原则出发,并使用案例示例,我们回顾了以结果为导向的(病例交叉[CCO]、病例时间对照[CTC]、病例病例时间对照[CCTC])和以暴露为导向的(自我对照病例系列[SCCS])研究设计。

结果

阐明了与暴露、结果和与时间相关的问题相关的关键方法学特征,并引入了一种通用语言和工作表,以促进 SCOPE 研究的设计。

结论

对 SCOPE 设计的概念基础、术语和关系达成共识将有助于理解和批判性评估已发表的研究,并有助于新 SCOPE 研究的设计、分析和审查。本文由 ISPE 认可。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d056/8251635/350d240221eb/PDS-30-671-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验