Duckworth Angela L, Gross James J
University of Pennsylvania.
Stanford University.
Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 2020 Nov;161(Suppl):39-49. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.09.002. Epub 2020 Dec 10.
Despite rapid growth in the empirical research on behavior change, modern science has yet to produce a coherent set of recommendations for individuals and organizations eager to align everyday actions with enduringly valued goals. We propose the as a parsimonious framework for organizing strategies according to where they have their primary impact in the generation of behavioral impulses. To begin, individuals exist in objective situations, only certain features of which attract attention, which in turn lead to subjective appraisals, then finally give rise to response tendencies. Unhealthy habits develop when conflicting impulses are consistently resolved in favor of momentary temptations instead of valued goals. To change behavior for the better, we can strategically modify objective , where we pay , how we construct , and how we enact . Crucially, behavior change strategies can be initiated either by the individual (i.e., self-control) or by others (e.g., a benevolent employer).
尽管行为改变的实证研究迅速发展,但现代科学尚未为渴望使日常行为与持久重视的目标保持一致的个人和组织提供一套连贯的建议。我们提出了 作为一个简洁的框架,用于根据策略在行为冲动产生过程中的主要影响位置来组织策略。首先,个体存在于客观情境中,只有其中某些特征会引起注意,这进而导致主观评估,最终产生反应倾向。当相互冲突的冲动始终偏向即时诱惑而非重视的目标得到解决时,不健康的习惯就会形成。为了使行为向好的方向改变,我们可以从策略上改变客观 、我们关注的 、我们构建 的方式以及我们实施 的方式。至关重要的是,行为改变策略既可以由个人发起(即自我控制),也可以由他人发起(例如仁慈的雇主)。
原文中部分处有缺失内容,用“ ”表示,翻译时保留原样。