Diabetes Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021 Feb 26;12:631463. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.631463. eCollection 2021.
Since its introduction more than twenty years ago, intraportal allogeneic cadaveric islet transplantation has been shown to be a promising therapy for patients with Type I Diabetes (T1D). Despite its positive outcome, the impact of islet transplantation has been limited due to a number of confounding issues, including the limited availability of cadaveric islets, the typically lifelong dependence of immunosuppressive drugs, and the lack of coverage of transplant costs by health insurance companies in some countries. Despite improvements in the immunosuppressive regimen, the number of required islets remains high, with two or more donors per patient often needed. Insulin independence is typically achieved upon islet transplantation, but on average just 25% of patients do not require exogenous insulin injections five years after. For these reasons, implementation of islet transplantation has been restricted almost exclusively to patients with brittle T1D who cannot avoid hypoglycemic events despite optimized insulin therapy. To improve C-peptide levels in patients with both T1 and T2 Diabetes, numerous clinical trials have explored the efficacy of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), both as supporting cells to protect existing β cells, and as source for newly generated β cells. Transplantation of MSCs is found to be effective for T2D patients, but its efficacy in T1D is controversial, as the ability of MSCs to differentiate into functional β cells is poor, and transdifferentiation does not seem to occur. Instead, to address limitations related to supply, human embryonic stem cell (hESC)-derived β cells are being explored as surrogates for cadaveric islets. Transplantation of allogeneic hESC-derived insulin-producing organoids has recently entered Phase I and Phase II clinical trials. Stem cell replacement therapies overcome the barrier of finite availability, but they still face immune rejection. Immune protective strategies, including coupling hESC-derived insulin-producing organoids with macroencapsulation devices and microencapsulation technologies, are being tested to balance the necessity of immune protection with the need for vascularization. Here, we compare the diverse human stem cell approaches and outcomes of recently completed and ongoing clinical trials, and discuss innovative strategies developed to overcome the most significant challenges remaining for transplanting stem cell-derived β cells.
自二十多年前引入以来,门静脉内同种异体尸源胰岛移植已被证明是治疗 1 型糖尿病(T1D)患者的一种有前途的疗法。尽管取得了积极的结果,但由于许多混杂因素的影响,胰岛移植的影响仍然有限,这些因素包括尸源胰岛的有限供应、免疫抑制剂药物的终身依赖以及一些国家的健康保险公司对移植费用的覆盖不足。尽管免疫抑制方案有所改善,但所需胰岛的数量仍然很高,通常每个患者需要两个或更多供体。胰岛移植后通常会实现胰岛素独立性,但平均只有 25%的患者在五年后无需注射外源性胰岛素。由于这些原因,胰岛移植几乎仅局限于脆性 T1D 患者,这些患者尽管经过胰岛素治疗优化,仍无法避免低血糖事件。为了提高 T1 和 T2 糖尿病患者的 C 肽水平,许多临床试验探索了间充质干细胞(MSCs)的疗效,包括作为支持细胞来保护现有的β细胞,以及作为新生成的β细胞的来源。MSCs 移植对 T2D 患者有效,但在 T1D 中的疗效存在争议,因为 MSCs 分化为功能性β细胞的能力较差,并且似乎不会发生转分化。相反,为了解决与供应相关的限制,正在探索人胚胎干细胞(hESC)衍生的β细胞作为尸源胰岛的替代品。同种异体 hESC 衍生的胰岛素产生类器官的移植最近已进入 I 期和 II 期临床试验。干细胞替代疗法克服了有限供应的障碍,但它们仍然面临免疫排斥。免疫保护策略,包括将 hESC 衍生的胰岛素产生类器官与大包裹装置和微包裹技术结合使用,正在进行测试,以平衡免疫保护的必要性与血管化的需求。在这里,我们比较了最近完成和正在进行的临床试验中使用的不同人类干细胞方法和结果,并讨论了为克服移植干细胞衍生的β细胞所面临的最重大挑战而开发的创新策略。