Schaefer G Owen
Centre for Biomedical Ethics, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Asian Bioeth Rev. 2018 Mar 9;10(1):67-73. doi: 10.1007/s41649-018-0044-1. eCollection 2018 Mar.
Individual health assessments (IHAs) for asymptomatic individuals provide a challenge to traditional distinctions between patient care and non-medical practice. They may involve undue radiation exposure, lead to false positives, and involve high out-of-pocket costs for recipients. A recent paper (Journal of the American College of Radiology 13(12): 1447-1457.e1, 2016) has criticised the use of IHAs and argued that recipients should be classified as 'presenters', not 'patients', to distinguish it from regular medical care. I critique this classificatory move, on two grounds: one, it is conceptually suspect. Two, it obviates the medical ethics framework for IHAs, potentially exposing recipients of IHAs to lower standards of oversight and protection. Responsible regulation of IHAs will be easier to ethically justify if those seeking IHAs are considered patients and not merely presenters.
针对无症状个体的个体健康评估(IHA)对传统的患者护理与非医疗实践之间的区分构成了挑战。它们可能涉及过度的辐射暴露,导致假阳性结果,并使接受者承担高额的自付费用。最近一篇论文(《美国放射学会杂志》13(12): 1447 - 1457.e1, 2016)批评了IHA的使用,并主张应将接受者归类为“来访者”而非“患者”,以使其有别于常规医疗护理。我基于两个理由对这一分类举措提出批评:其一,它在概念上值得怀疑。其二,它规避了IHA的医学伦理框架,可能使IHA的接受者面临更低的监督和保护标准。如果将寻求IHA的人视为患者而非仅仅是来访者,那么对IHA进行负责任的监管将更容易从伦理上得到正当理由。