Suppr超能文献

报告者还是患者?个体健康评估中的关键区别。

Presenters or Patients? A Crucial Distinction in Individual Health Assessments.

作者信息

Schaefer G Owen

机构信息

Centre for Biomedical Ethics, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.

出版信息

Asian Bioeth Rev. 2018 Mar 9;10(1):67-73. doi: 10.1007/s41649-018-0044-1. eCollection 2018 Mar.

Abstract

Individual health assessments (IHAs) for asymptomatic individuals provide a challenge to traditional distinctions between patient care and non-medical practice. They may involve undue radiation exposure, lead to false positives, and involve high out-of-pocket costs for recipients. A recent paper (Journal of the American College of Radiology 13(12): 1447-1457.e1, 2016) has criticised the use of IHAs and argued that recipients should be classified as 'presenters', not 'patients', to distinguish it from regular medical care. I critique this classificatory move, on two grounds: one, it is conceptually suspect. Two, it obviates the medical ethics framework for IHAs, potentially exposing recipients of IHAs to lower standards of oversight and protection. Responsible regulation of IHAs will be easier to ethically justify if those seeking IHAs are considered patients and not merely presenters.

摘要

针对无症状个体的个体健康评估(IHA)对传统的患者护理与非医疗实践之间的区分构成了挑战。它们可能涉及过度的辐射暴露,导致假阳性结果,并使接受者承担高额的自付费用。最近一篇论文(《美国放射学会杂志》13(12): 1447 - 1457.e1, 2016)批评了IHA的使用,并主张应将接受者归类为“来访者”而非“患者”,以使其有别于常规医疗护理。我基于两个理由对这一分类举措提出批评:其一,它在概念上值得怀疑。其二,它规避了IHA的医学伦理框架,可能使IHA的接受者面临更低的监督和保护标准。如果将寻求IHA的人视为患者而非仅仅是来访者,那么对IHA进行负责任的监管将更容易从伦理上得到正当理由。

相似文献

1
Presenters or Patients? A Crucial Distinction in Individual Health Assessments.报告者还是患者?个体健康评估中的关键区别。
Asian Bioeth Rev. 2018 Mar 9;10(1):67-73. doi: 10.1007/s41649-018-0044-1. eCollection 2018 Mar.
3
[Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].[德国药品效益评估的程序和方法]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2008 Dec;133 Suppl 7:S225-46. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1100954. Epub 2008 Nov 25.
6
No. 385-Indications for Pelvic Examination.第385号——盆腔检查的适应症
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2019 Aug;41(8):1221-1234. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2018.12.007.

本文引用的文献

3
Are we being exposed to radiation in the hospital?我们在医院里会受到辐射吗?
Environ Health Toxicol. 2016 Mar 14;31:e2016005. doi: 10.5620/eht.e2016005. eCollection 2016.
5
23andMe and the FDA.23魔方公司与美国食品药品监督管理局。
N Engl J Med. 2014 Mar 13;370(11):985-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1316367. Epub 2014 Feb 12.
7
The gray zones of privatized imaging.
Am J Bioeth. 2009 Apr;9(4):21-2. doi: 10.1080/15265160802716845.
8
Systematic review: the long-term effects of false-positive mammograms.系统评价:乳腺钼靶检查假阳性的长期影响
Ann Intern Med. 2007 Apr 3;146(7):502-10. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-146-7-200704030-00006.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验