Brewer Noel T, Salz Talya, Lillie Sarah E
Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, School of Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA.
Ann Intern Med. 2007 Apr 3;146(7):502-10. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-146-7-200704030-00006.
Although abnormal screening mammograms deleteriously affect the psychological well-being of women during the time immediately surrounding the tests, their long-term effects are poorly understood.
To characterize the long-term effects of false-positive screening mammograms on the behavior and well-being of women 40 years of age or older.
English-language studies from the MEDLINE, Web of Science, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and ERIC databases through August 2006.
Studies were identified that examined the effects of false-positive results of routine screening mammography on women's behavior, well-being, or beliefs.
Two investigators independently coded study characteristics, quality, and effect sizes.
23 eligible studies (n = 313,967) were identified. A random-effects meta-analysis showed that U.S. women who received false-positive results on screening mammography were more likely to return for routine screening than those who received normal results (risk ratio, 1.07 [95% CI, 1.02 to 1.12]). The effect was not statistically significant among European women (risk ratio, 0.97 [CI, 0.93 to 1.01]), and Canadian women were less likely to return for routine screening because of false-positive results (risk ratio, 0.63 [CI, 0.50 to 0.80]). Women who received false-positive results conducted more frequent breast self-examinations and had higher, but not apparently pathologically elevated, levels of distress and anxiety and thought more about breast cancer than did those with normal results.
Correlational study designs, a small number of studies, a lack of clinical validation for many measures, and possible heterogeneity.
Some women with false-positive results on mammography may have differences in whether they return for mammography, occurrence of breast self-examinations, and levels of anxiety compared with women with normal results. Future research should examine how false-positive results on mammography affect other outcomes, such as trust and health care use.
尽管乳腺钼靶筛查结果异常会在检查前后的短时间内对女性的心理健康产生有害影响,但其长期影响却鲜为人知。
描述假阳性乳腺钼靶筛查结果对40岁及以上女性行为和幸福感的长期影响。
截至2006年8月,来自MEDLINE、科学网、EMBASE、CINAHL、PsycINFO和ERIC数据库的英文研究。
确定了研究常规乳腺钼靶筛查假阳性结果对女性行为、幸福感或信念影响的研究。
两名研究人员独立对研究特征、质量和效应大小进行编码。
确定了23项符合条件的研究(n = 313,967)。随机效应荟萃分析表明,乳腺钼靶筛查结果为假阳性的美国女性比结果正常的女性更有可能返回进行常规筛查(风险比,1.07 [95% CI,1.02至1.12])。在欧洲女性中,这种效应无统计学意义(风险比,0.97 [CI,0.93至1.01]),而加拿大女性因假阳性结果返回进行常规筛查的可能性较小(风险比,0.63 [CI,0.50至0.80])。与结果正常的女性相比,筛查结果为假阳性的女性进行更频繁的乳房自我检查,苦恼和焦虑水平更高,但无明显病理性升高,且更多地思考乳腺癌。
相关性研究设计、研究数量少、许多测量缺乏临床验证以及可能存在异质性。
与结果正常的女性相比,一些乳腺钼靶筛查结果为假阳性的女性在是否返回进行钼靶检查、乳房自我检查的发生率以及焦虑水平方面可能存在差异。未来的研究应探讨乳腺钼靶筛查假阳性结果如何影响其他结果,如信任和医疗保健利用。