• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预先医疗照护计划:一项关于患有危及生命或生命有限疾病的患者体验的系统评价。

Advance care planning: A systematic review about experiences of patients with a life-threatening or life-limiting illness.

机构信息

1 Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

2 Department of Public Health, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Palliat Med. 2018 Sep;32(8):1305-1321. doi: 10.1177/0269216318784474. Epub 2018 Jun 29.

DOI:10.1177/0269216318784474
PMID:29956558
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6088519/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Advance care planning is seen as an important strategy to improve end-of-life communication and the quality of life of patients and their relatives. However, the frequency of advance care planning conversations in practice remains low. In-depth understanding of patients' experiences with advance care planning might provide clues to optimise its value to patients and improve implementation.

AIM

To synthesise and describe the research findings on the experiences with advance care planning of patients with a life-threatening or life-limiting illness.

DESIGN

A systematic literature review, using an iterative search strategy. A thematic synthesis was conducted and was supported by NVivo 11.

DATA SOURCES

The search was performed in MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO and CINAHL on 7 November 2016.

RESULTS

Of the 3555 articles found, 20 were included. We identified three themes in patients' experiences with advance care planning. 'Ambivalence' refers to patients simultaneously experiencing benefits from advance care planning as well as unpleasant feelings. 'Readiness' for advance care planning is a necessary prerequisite for taking up its benefits but can also be promoted by the process of advance care planning itself. 'Openness' refers to patients' need to feel comfortable in being open about their preferences for future care towards relevant others.

CONCLUSION

Although participation in advance care planning can be accompanied by unpleasant feelings, many patients reported benefits of advance care planning as well. This suggests a need for advance care planning to be personalised in a form which is both feasible and relevant at moments suitable for the individual patient.

摘要

背景

预先医疗照护计划被视为改善末期病患及其家属之临终沟通与生活品质的重要策略。然而,实务中预先医疗照护计划的讨论频率仍然偏低。深入了解病患对于预先医疗照护计划的经验可能提供线索以优化其对病患的价值,并改善其施行。

目的

综合并描述患有危及生命或生命有限疾病之病患对于预先医疗照护计划经验的研究发现。

设计

系统文献回顾,使用迭代式搜寻策略。进行主题式综合,并以 NVivo 11 辅助。

资料来源

2016 年 11 月 7 日在 MEDLINE、Embase、PsycINFO 和 CINAHL 进行检索。

结果

在 3555 篇文章中,有 20 篇被纳入。我们在病患对于预先医疗照护计划的经验中识别出三个主题。“矛盾心理”指的是病患同时体验到预先医疗照护计划的益处以及不愉快的感觉。“准备就绪”是接受预先医疗照护计划益处的必要前提条件,但也可透过预先医疗照护计划本身的过程来促进。“开放性”指的是病患需要对相关他人感到自在地公开其对于未来照护的偏好。

结论

虽然参与预先医疗照护计划可能伴随着不愉快的感觉,但许多病患也报告了预先医疗照护计划的益处。这表明预先医疗照护计划需要以对个体病患而言既可行又相关的方式进行个性化。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aec2/6088519/469e0b935a22/10.1177_0269216318784474-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aec2/6088519/469e0b935a22/10.1177_0269216318784474-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aec2/6088519/469e0b935a22/10.1177_0269216318784474-fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Advance care planning: A systematic review about experiences of patients with a life-threatening or life-limiting illness.预先医疗照护计划:一项关于患有危及生命或生命有限疾病的患者体验的系统评价。
Palliat Med. 2018 Sep;32(8):1305-1321. doi: 10.1177/0269216318784474. Epub 2018 Jun 29.
2
Experiences and perspectives of older people regarding advance care planning: A meta-synthesis of qualitative studies.老年人对预立医疗照护计划的体验与观点:定性研究的元综合分析
Palliat Med. 2017 May;31(5):394-405. doi: 10.1177/0269216316663507. Epub 2016 Aug 11.
3
Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.不同种族文化群体成年癌症患者的姑息治疗体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):99-111. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1809.
4
Implantable cardioverter defibrillator deactivation and advance care planning: a focus group study.可植入心脏除颤器的停用和预先护理计划:一项焦点小组研究。
Heart. 2020 Feb;106(3):190-195. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2019-315721. Epub 2019 Sep 19.
5
Perceptions of trained laypersons in end-of-life or advance care planning conversations: a qualitative meta-synthesis.训练有素的非专业人士对临终或预先护理计划谈话的看法:定性元分析。
BMC Palliat Care. 2018 Aug 6;17(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s12904-018-0354-9.
6
How to Talk About Attitudes Toward the End of Life: A Qualitative Study.如何谈论对生命终结的态度:一项定性研究。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2019 Aug;36(8):697-704. doi: 10.1177/1049909119836238. Epub 2019 Mar 14.
7
The engagement of young people in their own advance care planning process: A systematic narrative synthesis.年轻人参与自身预先护理计划的过程:系统叙述性综合。
Palliat Med. 2018 Jul;32(7):1147-1166. doi: 10.1177/0269216318772749. Epub 2018 May 3.
8
What influences patients' decisions regarding palliative care in advance care planning discussions? Perspectives from a qualitative study conducted with advanced cancer patients, families and healthcare professionals.影响患者在预先护理计划讨论中选择姑息治疗的因素有哪些?一项对晚期癌症患者、家属和医疗保健专业人员进行的定性研究的观点。
Palliat Med. 2019 Dec;33(10):1299-1309. doi: 10.1177/0269216319866641. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
9
"Our best hope is a cure." Hope in the context of advance care planning.“我们最大的希望是找到治愈方法。”在预先护理计划背景下的希望。
Palliat Support Care. 2012 Jun;10(2):75-82. doi: 10.1017/S147895151100068X. Epub 2012 Feb 24.
10
Patient empowerment, what does it mean for adults in the advanced stages of a life-limiting illness: A systematic review using critical interpretive synthesis.患者赋权,对于生命末期的成年人意味着什么:使用批判解释性综合方法的系统评价。
Palliat Med. 2018 Sep;32(8):1288-1304. doi: 10.1177/0269216318783919. Epub 2018 Jun 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Family satisfaction with the end-of-life discussions and resuscitation orders for patients with severe COVID-19: a multicenter study in Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯一项多中心研究:新冠重症患者家属对临终讨论及复苏医嘱的满意度
BMC Med Ethics. 2025 Jul 26;26(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s12910-025-01248-8.
2
Evaluating outcomes of advance care planning interventions for adults living with advanced illness and people close to them: A systematic meta-review.评估针对晚期疾病成人患者及其身边亲人的预立医疗计划干预措施的效果:一项系统的元分析综述。
Palliat Med. 2025 Sep;39(8):833-848. doi: 10.1177/02692163251344428. Epub 2025 Jun 19.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group guidance series-paper 3: methods for assessing methodological limitations, data extraction and synthesis, and confidence in synthesized qualitative findings.考克兰定性和实施方法组指南系列论文 3:评估方法学局限性、数据提取和综合以及对综合定性发现的信心的方法。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2018 May;97:49-58. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.06.020. Epub 2017 Dec 13.
2
Advance care planning for patients with chronic respiratory diseases: a systematic review of preferences and practices.慢性呼吸系统疾病患者的预先医疗照护计划:偏好与实践的系统评价。
Thorax. 2018 Mar;73(3):222-230. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2016-209806. Epub 2017 Nov 6.
3
"You like to be in control of your own destiny to a degree, don't you?": conscientious autonomy and planning for future care with dementia.
“在一定程度上,你喜欢掌控自己的命运,不是吗?”:尽责的自主性与痴呆症患者未来护理规划
BMC Palliat Care. 2025 May 16;24(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s12904-025-01782-7.
4
The low-carbon fruit tree for primary care.基层医疗的低碳果树。
Healthc Manage Forum. 2025 May 14;38(4):8404704251333639. doi: 10.1177/08404704251333639.
5
Perceived acceptability of a prototype toolkit to support patients and informal caregivers to express their perspectives in palliative care conversations.一种原型工具包在支持患者和非正式照护者在姑息治疗对话中表达自身观点方面的可接受度认知。
PEC Innov. 2025 Mar 17;6:100387. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2025.100387. eCollection 2025 Jun.
6
Palliative Care and Advanced Cardiovascular Disease in Adults: Not Just End-of-Life Care: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.成人姑息治疗与晚期心血管疾病:不仅仅是临终关怀——美国心脏协会的科学声明
Circulation. 2025 May 27;151(21):e1030-e1042. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001323. Epub 2025 Apr 17.
7
Implementation of a Web-Based Program for Advance Care Planning and Evaluation of its Complexity With the Nonadoption, Abandonment, Scale-Up, Spread, And Sustainability (NASSS) Framework: Qualitative Evaluation Study.基于网络的预立医疗计划项目的实施及其复杂性评估:采用非采用、废弃、扩大规模、传播及可持续性(NASSS)框架的定性评估研究
JMIR Aging. 2025 Mar 4;8:e49507. doi: 10.2196/49507.
8
Evaluation of Electronic Palliative Care Coordination Systems to support advance care planning for people living with life-threatening conditions (PREPARE): protocol for a multicentre observational study using routinely collected primary and secondary care data in England.评估电子姑息治疗协调系统以支持危及生命疾病患者的预立医疗计划(PREPARE):一项在英格兰使用常规收集的初级和二级医疗数据的多中心观察性研究方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Mar 5;15(3):e093175. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093175.
9
Advance care planning readiness among older adults in aged service centers: A cross-sectional study.老年服务中心老年人的预先护理计划准备情况:一项横断面研究。
Int J Nurs Sci. 2024 Dec 16;12(1):59-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2024.12.005. eCollection 2025 Jan.
10
Interventions to increase utilisation of advanced care planning documentation for hospitalised older adults.提高住院老年人晚期护理计划文件利用率的干预措施。
BMJ Open Qual. 2025 Jan 6;14(1):e002703. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002703.
Definition and recommendations for advance care planning: an international consensus supported by the European Association for Palliative Care.
预先医疗照护计划的定义和建议:欧洲缓和医疗协会支持的国际共识。
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Sep;18(9):e543-e551. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30582-X.
4
Defining Advance Care Planning for Adults: A Consensus Definition From a Multidisciplinary Delphi Panel.为成年人定义预先护理计划:多学科德尔菲专家组的共识定义
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017 May;53(5):821-832.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.12.331. Epub 2017 Jan 3.
5
"There were more decisions and more options than just yes or no": Evaluating a decision aid for advanced cancer patients and their family caregivers.“除了是或否,还有更多的决策和更多的选择”:评估一种针对晚期癌症患者及其家庭照顾者的决策辅助工具。
Palliat Support Care. 2017 Feb;15(1):44-56. doi: 10.1017/S1478951516000596. Epub 2016 Aug 12.
6
Embracing inherent uncertainty in advanced illness.接纳晚期疾病中固有的不确定性。
BMJ. 2016 Jul 18;354:i3802. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i3802.
7
LVAD patients' and surrogates' perspectives on SPIRIT-HF: An advance care planning discussion.左心室辅助装置(LVAD)患者及其代理人对SPIRIT-HF的看法:一次预先护理计划讨论
Heart Lung. 2016 Jul-Aug;45(4):305-10. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2016.05.033.
8
The diverse impact of advance care planning: a long-term follow-up study on patients' and relatives' experiences.预先医疗照护计划的多方面影响:对患者和家属体验的长期随访研究。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2017 Sep;7(3):335-340. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2015-000886. Epub 2015 Sep 30.
9
Advance care planning for cancer patients: a systematic review of perceptions and experiences of patients, families, and healthcare providers.癌症患者的预立医疗计划:对患者、家属和医疗服务提供者的认知与经历的系统评价
Psychooncology. 2016 Apr;25(4):362-86. doi: 10.1002/pon.3926. Epub 2015 Sep 20.
10
A mixed method feasibility study of a patient- and family-centred advance care planning intervention for cancer patients.一项针对癌症患者的以患者和家庭为中心的预先护理计划干预措施的混合方法可行性研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2015 May 16;14:27. doi: 10.1186/s12904-015-0023-1.