Mizu Daisuke, Matsuoka Yoshinori, Huh Ji-Young, Ariyoshi Koichi
Department of Emergency Medicine Kobe City Medical Centre General Hospital Hyogo Japan.
Acute Med Surg. 2021 Mar 1;8(1):e637. doi: 10.1002/ams2.637. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
To evaluate whether vital signs can predict whether hypoglycemia can be eliminated as the cause of impaired consciousness in prehospital settings.
We extracted the data of patients who underwent blood glucose measurements by paramedics in Kobe City, Japan from April 2015 to March 2019. We used receiver operating characteristic curves and calculated the area under the curve (AUC) to evaluate the validity of the vital signs in distinguishing hypoglycemia. We also calculated stratum-specific likelihood ratios to examine the threshold at which hypoglycemia becomes less likely for each vital sign.
Of the 1,791 patients, 1,242 were eligible for analysis. Hypoglycemia was observed in 324 patients (26.1%). Significant differences in each vital sign were noted between the hypoglycemic and non-hypoglycemic groups. Body temperature was moderately accurate in differentiating between the two groups (AUC, 0.71; 95% confidence interval, 0.68-0.74). Furthermore, in patients with systolic blood pressure <100 mmHg and body temperature ≥38°C, it was unlikely that hypoglycemia caused impaired consciousness (stratum-specific likelihood ratios 0.12 and 0.15; 95% confidence intervals, 0.05-0.25 and 0.06-0.35, respectively).
In the prehospital assessment of patients with impaired consciousness, high fever or hypotension was helpful in differentiating between hypoglycemia and non-hypoglycemia. In particular, body temperature ≥38°C or systolic blood pressure <100 mmHg indicated a low likelihood of hypoglycemia. A validation study is needed to confirm the findings in this study.
评估在院前环境中生命体征能否预测低血糖是否可被排除为意识障碍的原因。
我们提取了2015年4月至2019年3月在日本神户市由护理人员进行血糖测量的患者的数据。我们使用受试者工作特征曲线并计算曲线下面积(AUC)来评估生命体征在区分低血糖方面的有效性。我们还计算了分层特异性似然比,以检查每个生命体征在低血糖可能性降低时的阈值。
在1791名患者中,1242名符合分析条件。324名患者(26.1%)观察到低血糖。低血糖组和非低血糖组之间的每个生命体征均存在显著差异。体温在区分两组方面具有中等准确性(AUC,0.71;95%置信区间,0.68 - 0.74)。此外,收缩压<100 mmHg且体温≥38°C的患者中,低血糖导致意识障碍的可能性不大(分层特异性似然比分别为0.12和0.15;95%置信区间分别为0.05 - 0.25和0.06 - 0.35)。
在院前对意识障碍患者的评估中,高热或低血压有助于区分低血糖和非低血糖。特别是,体温≥38°C或收缩压<100 mmHg表明低血糖的可能性较低。需要进行验证研究以证实本研究中的发现。