The Incidence and Significance of Calcium Pyrophosphate Dihydrate Deposits in Histologic Examinations of Total Hip, Knee, and Shoulder Joint Arthroplasties.

CONTEXT.—: The incidence, distribution, and significance of calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate deposition (CPPD) disease have not been extensively compared among various total joint resections.

OBJECTIVE.—: To investigate and define the clinical and pathologic features of CPPD in hip, shoulder, and knee arthroplasties.

DESIGN.—: We retrospectively reviewed consecutive total hip, knee, and shoulder arthroplasty cases (N = 3195) confirmed pathologically between January 1, 2017, and October 10, 2018, comparing clinical and pathologic data.

RESULTS.—: Among 2004 hip arthroplasties, 61 (3%) had CPPD on pathologic examination; the majority had a histologic diagnosis of osteoarthritis, followed by fracture and avascular necrosis. Of 1113 knee arthroplasties, 98 (9%) had CPPD; all had a histologic diagnosis of osteoarthritis. Among 78 shoulder arthroplasties, 10 (13%) had CPPD; all but one had a histologic diagnosis of osteoarthritis. Patients with hip and knee CPPD were significantly older than those without CPPD. Of the 169 pathologically detected CPPD cases, only 35 (21%) were documented on preoperative radiologic images or by other clinical means; radiology reports were significantly more likely to document chondrocalcinosis in the knees than in the hips. Histologically, CPPD was noted almost exclusively in the separately submitted soft tissues/joint capsule, concomitantly involving the articular cartilage surface in only 3.0% (5 of 169) of cases.

CONCLUSIONS.—: Calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate deposition is more than twice as likely to occur in the knees and shoulders compared with the hips. Patients with CPPD in the knees or hips are usually not recognized preoperatively/radiologically and constitute a significantly older population. Reliably establishing the diagnosis of CPPD requires pathologic examination of the submitted soft tissue/joint capsule.