Suppr超能文献

改良内镜下放射状切开与切开法(M-RIC)治疗难治性食管狭窄。

Modified endoscopic radial incision and cutting method (M-RIC) for the treatment of refractory esophageal stricture.

机构信息

College of Joint Training with Southeast University, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.

Department of Gastroenterology, Southeast University Zhongda Hospital, 87 Dingjiaqiao Road, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2022 Feb;36(2):1385-1393. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08423-z. Epub 2021 Mar 15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Refractory esophageal stricture is difficult to deal with. Some refractory stricture shows little response to now-existing endoscopic techniques. We assessed the efficacy of modified endoscopic radial incision and cutting method (M-RIC) for the treatment of refractory esophageal stricture.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study. Patients with refractory esophageal stricture who underwent M-RIC or dilation from June 2016 to June 2020 were included. Outcomes measured included technical and clinical success, restenosis rate, time to restenosis and complications. Risk factors for restenosis after M-RIC were assessed.

RESULTS

67 patients were enrolled (M-RIC group, n = 29; dilation group, n = 38). After propensity score matching, each group include 28 patients. There were no significant differences in technical success (96.4% vs 100%, p = 1.00) or clinical success (89.3% vs 100%, p = 0.23) between groups. Patients in M-RIC group had lower rates of restenosis (75% vs. 100%, p = 0.02) and longer time to restenosis (110 days vs 31.5 days, p = 0.00) compared with dilation group. 4 patients did not require any additional treatment after M-RIC and maintained food intake until the end of follow-up. Complications of M-RIC include perforation, fever and retrosternal pain, and no difference was found in total complication rate when compared with dilation group (25% vs 7.1%, p = 0.07). Although 3 out of 28 patients (10.7%) in M-RIC group had perforation, the perforation rate was not significantly different between groups (p = 0.11). Multivariate analyze suggested stricture length ≥ 5 cm (HR 7.25, p = 0.00) was a risk factor to restenosis while oral prednisone (HR 0.29, p = 0.02) was associated with preventing restenosis after M-RIC.

CONCLUSION

M-RIC is a feasible and effective technique for refractory esophageal stricture with lower rate and longer time to restenosis. Stricture length ≥ 5 cm is a risk factor to restenosis while oral prednisone is helpful in remitting restenosis after M-RIC.

摘要

背景

难治性食管狭窄难以处理。一些难治性狭窄对现有的内镜技术反应不佳。我们评估了改良内镜放射状切开和切割法(M-RIC)治疗难治性食管狭窄的疗效。

方法

这是一项回顾性研究。纳入 2016 年 6 月至 2020 年 6 月期间接受 M-RIC 或扩张治疗的难治性食管狭窄患者。评估的结果包括技术和临床成功率、再狭窄率、再狭窄时间和并发症。评估 M-RIC 后再狭窄的危险因素。

结果

共纳入 67 例患者(M-RIC 组 29 例,扩张组 38 例)。经倾向评分匹配后,每组各 28 例患者。两组的技术成功率(96.4%比 100%,p=1.00)或临床成功率(89.3%比 100%,p=0.23)无显著差异。M-RIC 组的再狭窄率较低(75%比 100%,p=0.02),再狭窄时间较长(110 天比 31.5 天,p=0.00)。与扩张组相比,M-RIC 组有 4 例患者无需进一步治疗,且维持进食直至随访结束。M-RIC 的并发症包括穿孔、发热和胸骨后疼痛,与扩张组的总并发症发生率无差异(25%比 7.1%,p=0.07)。尽管 M-RIC 组 28 例患者中有 3 例(10.7%)发生穿孔,但两组之间的穿孔率无显著差异(p=0.11)。多因素分析表明,狭窄长度≥5 cm(HR 7.25,p=0.00)是再狭窄的危险因素,而口服泼尼松(HR 0.29,p=0.02)与 M-RIC 后预防再狭窄有关。

结论

M-RIC 是一种治疗难治性食管狭窄的可行且有效的方法,其再狭窄率较低,再狭窄时间较长。狭窄长度≥5 cm 是再狭窄的危险因素,而口服泼尼松有助于缓解 M-RIC 后再狭窄。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验