Suppr超能文献

重复内镜下径向切口及切割术治疗良性食管狭窄的疗效与安全性

Efficacy and safety of repeated endoscopic radial incision and cutting procedure for benign esophageal stricture.

作者信息

Kano Yuki, Kadota Tomohiro, Inaba Atsushi, Sunakawa Hironori, Takashima Kenji, Nakajo Keiichiro, Murano Tatsuro, Shinmura Kensuke, Yoda Yusuke, Ikematsu Hiroaki, Akimoto Tetsuo, Yano Tomonori

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan.

Course of Advanced Clinical Research of Cancer, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Endosc Int Open. 2023 Mar 8;11(3):E230-E236. doi: 10.1055/a-2005-7678. eCollection 2023 Mar.

Abstract

Radial incision and cutting (RIC) is indicated for refractory benign esophageal strictures after curative treatment for esophageal cancer and has shown favorable short-term outcomes. However, re-stricture after RIC may occur in the long term, and RIC is performed repeatedly in such cases, but the efficacy and safety of repeated RIC are unclear. Therefore, we aimed to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of the repeated RIC for refractory benign esophageal strictures after surgical and non-surgical treatment. Between April 2008 and September 2019, we enrolled patients who were treated with the first RIC for benign esophageal strictures. The RIC was indicated for the refractory stricture and repeatedly performed for re-refractory esophageal stricture after RIC. We retrospectively evaluated the 6-month refractory stricture-free rate, and adverse events (AEs) in the first RIC and repeated RICs. Forty-six patients (39 men, 7 women; median age, 71 years, range 49-85) were included. RIC was performed once in 24 patients (non-repeated RIC group) and two or more times in 22 patients (repeated RIC group). In all patients, the 6-month refractory stricture-free rate after the first RIC were 42.3 %. In the repeated RIC group, the 6-month refractory stricture-free rate after the first and repeated RICs were 18.2 % vs 18.2 %, respectively. No AEs were noted. Repeated RIC could be effective in the short-term and safe even for patients with refractory benign esophageal stricture after the first RIC. However, it cannot be considered curative treatment for refractory stricture because of poor long-term results.

摘要

放射状切开与切割术(RIC)适用于食管癌根治性治疗后难治性良性食管狭窄,且已显示出良好的短期疗效。然而,RIC术后长期可能会再次出现狭窄,在这种情况下需重复进行RIC,但重复RIC的疗效和安全性尚不清楚。因此,我们旨在证明重复RIC治疗手术和非手术治疗后难治性良性食管狭窄的疗效和安全性。2008年4月至2019年9月,我们纳入了接受首次RIC治疗良性食管狭窄的患者。RIC适用于难治性狭窄,对于RIC术后再次出现难治性食管狭窄的情况则重复进行。我们回顾性评估了首次RIC及重复RIC后的6个月无难治性狭窄率和不良事件(AE)。共纳入46例患者(39例男性,7例女性;中位年龄71岁,范围49 - 85岁)。24例患者进行了1次RIC(非重复RIC组),22例患者进行了2次或更多次RIC(重复RIC组)。所有患者首次RIC后6个月无难治性狭窄率为42.3%。在重复RIC组中,首次及重复RIC后6个月无难治性狭窄率分别为18.2%和18.2%。未观察到不良事件。重复RIC在短期内可能有效,即使对于首次RIC后难治性良性食管狭窄的患者也是安全的。然而,由于长期效果不佳,不能将其视为难治性狭窄的根治性治疗方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2b8/9995178/796d85e15c2b/10-1055-a-2005-7678-i2839ei1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验