• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用乡土树种造林以改善退化森林生态系统土壤质量的优势。

The advantage of afforestation using native tree species to enhance soil quality in degraded forest ecosystems.

机构信息

College of Forestry, Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding, 071000, China.

Hebei Saihanba Mechanized Forest Farm, Chengde, 067000, China.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 28;14(1):20022. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-71162-3.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-71162-3
PMID:39198681
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11358285/
Abstract

Different vegetation restoration methods have improved soil quality to varying degrees. This study, focused on the forest-grassland-desert transition zone in the Hebei-Inner Mongolia border region, and employed a systematic grid sampling method to establish fixed monitoring plots in the Saihanba Mechanized Forest Farm and the Ulan Buh Grassland. The differences in soil quality evolution across various vegetation restoration methods under the same climatic and soil historical conditions were analyzed, elucidating the roles of these vegetation restoration methods in degraded forest ecosystems, with the aim of providing a reference for ecological restoration under similar land conditions. This study used a grid method to establish sample points in the forest-grassland-desert transitional zone and assessed five methods of vegetation restoration sites: artificial forest composed of native species of Larix principis-rupprechtii (FL), artificial forest composed of exotic Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica (FP), natural secondary broad-leaved forest (FN), open grassland (GO), and enclosed grassland (GC). The differences in soil organic carbon (SOC), total nitrogen (TN), total phosphorus (TP), total potassium (TK), alkaline hydrolysis nitrogen (AN), rapidly available phosphorus (AP) and rapidly available potassium (AK) among the different vegetation restoration sites were compared via variance analysis, and the soil quality index (SQI) was calculated to assess the soil quality at the sample points. The SOC, TN, and AN contents of forest soil were significantly greater than those of grassland, and the TN, TP, AN, AK, and SOC contents of FL, FN, and GC were significantly greater than those of FP and GO. Among them, the TN, TP, and SOC contents were the highest in the FL, reaching 2.74, 0.39, and 47.27 g kg, respectively. In terms of ecological stoichiometric characteristics, the average N:P ratio in the study area was 6.68, indicating a serious lack of N in the study area. Among the different types of restoration sites, the effect was stronger in the FP than in the FL, and the TN and AN contents were only 1.48 g kg and 116.69 mg kg, respectively. The SQI in the FL was not significantly different from that in the FN or GC, but it was significantly greater than that in the FP and GO. These findings indicate that native tree species restoration in degraded forest ecosystems significantly improved soil quality, while the introduction of exotic tree species for afforestation had a minimal effect on improving soil quality.

摘要

不同的植被恢复方法在不同程度上改善了土壤质量。本研究以河北-内蒙古交界地区的森林-草原-荒漠过渡带为研究对象,采用系统网格采样法,在塞罕坝机械化林场和乌兰布和草原建立固定监测样地,分析了同一气候和土壤历史条件下不同植被恢复方法对土壤质量演变的差异,阐明了这些植被恢复方法在退化森林生态系统中的作用,为类似土地条件下的生态恢复提供参考。本研究采用网格法在森林-草原-荒漠过渡带建立样点,评估了五种植被恢复地点的方法:由乡土树种落叶松(Larix principis-rupprechtii)组成的人工林(FL)、由外来树种樟子松(Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica)组成的人工林(FP)、天然次生阔叶林(FN)、开放草地(GO)和封闭草地(GC)。通过方差分析比较不同植被恢复地点之间土壤有机碳(SOC)、总氮(TN)、总磷(TP)、总钾(TK)、碱解氮(AN)、速效磷(AP)和速效钾(AK)的差异,并计算土壤质量指数(SQI)评估样点的土壤质量。林地土壤的 SOC、TN 和 AN 含量显著高于草地,FL、FN 和 GC 的 TN、TP、AN、AK 和 SOC 含量显著高于 FP 和 GO。其中,FL 的 TN、TP 和 SOC 含量最高,分别达到 2.74、0.39 和 47.27 g kg-1。在生态化学计量特征方面,研究区平均 N:P 比为 6.68,表明研究区 N 严重缺乏。在不同类型的恢复地点中,FP 的效果强于 FL,TN 和 AN 含量分别仅为 1.48 g kg-1 和 116.69 mg kg-1。FL 的 SQI 与 FN 或 GC 无显著差异,但明显大于 FP 和 GO。这些发现表明,在退化森林生态系统中,乡土树种恢复显著改善了土壤质量,而引入外来树种造林对改善土壤质量的作用较小。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1014/11358285/75464c72c279/41598_2024_71162_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1014/11358285/028cee3188f8/41598_2024_71162_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1014/11358285/5050461c5af4/41598_2024_71162_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1014/11358285/afc9bb11365d/41598_2024_71162_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1014/11358285/27fd01c1ed67/41598_2024_71162_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1014/11358285/75464c72c279/41598_2024_71162_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1014/11358285/028cee3188f8/41598_2024_71162_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1014/11358285/5050461c5af4/41598_2024_71162_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1014/11358285/afc9bb11365d/41598_2024_71162_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1014/11358285/27fd01c1ed67/41598_2024_71162_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1014/11358285/75464c72c279/41598_2024_71162_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The advantage of afforestation using native tree species to enhance soil quality in degraded forest ecosystems.利用乡土树种造林以改善退化森林生态系统土壤质量的优势。
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 28;14(1):20022. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-71162-3.
2
Soil C, N, P and K stoichiometry affected by vegetation restoration patterns in the alpine region of the Loess Plateau, Northwest China.土壤碳、氮、磷和钾化学计量学受中国西北黄土高原高寒地区植被恢复模式的影响。
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 5;15(11):e0241859. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241859. eCollection 2020.
3
Ecological stoichiometric characteristics of soil-moss C, N, and P in restoration stages of karst rocky desertification.喀斯特石漠化恢复阶段土壤-苔藓 C、N、P 的生态化学计量特征。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 30;16(6):e0252838. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252838. eCollection 2021.
4
Grazing exclusion is more beneficial for restoring soil organic carbon and nutrient balance than afforestation on degraded sandy land.在退化沙地上,禁牧比造林更有利于恢复土壤有机碳和养分平衡。
Front Plant Sci. 2023 Dec 21;14:1326244. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1326244. eCollection 2023.
5
The capacity of ion adsorption and purification for coniferous forests is stronger than that of broad-leaved forests.针叶林对离子的吸附和净化能力强于阔叶林。
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2021 Jun 1;215:112137. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.112137. Epub 2021 Mar 16.
6
Effects of vegetation and terrain changes on spatial heterogeneity of soil C-N-P in the coastal zone protected forests at northern China.植被和地形变化对中国北方沿海保护林土壤碳氮磷空间异质性的影响。
J Environ Manage. 2022 Sep 1;317:115472. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115472. Epub 2022 Jun 3.
7
Changes of soil nutrients and organic carbon fractions in forests with different restoration years in mountainous areas of southern Ningxia, China.中国宁夏南部山区不同恢复年限森林土壤养分及有机碳组分变化。
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2024 Mar 18;35(3):639-647. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202403.018.
8
[Differences in soil organic carbon and total nitrogen and their impact factors under different restoration patterns in the Loess Plateau.].黄土高原不同恢复模式下土壤有机碳和全氮差异及其影响因素
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2016 Mar;27(3):716-722. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201603.017.
9
Grazing exclusion is more effective for vegetation restoration and nutrient transfer in the heavily degraded desert steppe.放牧禁牧更有利于重度退化荒漠草原植被恢复和养分转移。
BMC Plant Biol. 2024 May 17;24(1):408. doi: 10.1186/s12870-024-05127-z.
10
Effects of vegetation, terrain and soil layer depth on eight soil chemical properties and soil fertility based on hybrid methods at urban forest scale in a typical loess hilly region of China.基于混合方法的典型黄土丘陵区城市森林尺度下植被、地形和土壤层深度对八种土壤化学性质和土壤肥力的影响。
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 18;13(10):e0205661. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205661. eCollection 2018.

引用本文的文献

1
Species richness is an important mediator of multifunctionality changes in Hobq desert shrub ecosystem.物种丰富度是毛乌素沙漠灌木生态系统多功能性变化的重要调节因素。
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 9;15(1):29152. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-14521-y.

本文引用的文献

1
Acidity of Soil and Water Decreases in Acid-Sensitive Forests of Tropical China.中国热带地区酸敏感森林土壤和水体酸度降低
Environ Sci Technol. 2023 Aug 1;57(30):11075-11083. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.3c01416. Epub 2023 Jul 20.
2
Responses of carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus contents and stoichiometry in soil and fine roots to natural vegetation restoration in a tropical mountainous area, Southern China.中国南方热带山区土壤和细根中碳、氮、磷含量及化学计量比对天然植被恢复的响应
Front Plant Sci. 2023 May 9;14:1181365. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1181365. eCollection 2023.
3
Emerging signals of declining forest resilience under climate change.
气候变化下森林恢复力下降的新信号。
Nature. 2022 Aug;608(7923):534-539. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-04959-9. Epub 2022 Jul 13.
4
Effects of Nitrogen and Phosphorus Addition on Soil Extracellular Enzyme Activity and Stoichiometry in Chinese Fir () Forests.氮磷添加对杉木林土壤胞外酶活性及化学计量特征的影响
Front Plant Sci. 2022 Mar 9;13:834184. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.834184. eCollection 2022.
5
Long-term ecological effects of two artificial forests on soil properties and quality in the eastern Qinghai-Tibet Plateau.青藏高原东部两种人工林对土壤性质和质量的长期生态影响。
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Nov 20;796:148986. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148986. Epub 2021 Jul 9.
6
Impacts of grazing on ground cover, soil physical properties and soil loss via surface erosion: A novel geospatial modelling approach.放牧对地表覆盖、土壤物理性质及地表侵蚀造成的土壤流失的影响:一种新型地理空间建模方法。
J Environ Manage. 2021 Jun 1;287:112206. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112206. Epub 2021 Mar 13.
7
Improvements in soil quality with vegetation succession in subtropical China karst.亚热带喀斯特地区植被演替对土壤质量的改善。
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Jun 25;775:145876. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145876. Epub 2021 Feb 15.
8
Variation of soil organic carbon and physical properties in relation to land uses in the Yellow River Delta, China.黄河三角洲土地利用方式对土壤有机碳和物理性质的影响。
Sci Rep. 2020 Nov 23;10(1):20317. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-77303-8.
9
Effects of vegetation restoration and environmental factors on understory vascular plants in a typical karst ecosystem in southern China.植被恢复和环境因子对中国南方典型喀斯特生态系统林下维管植物的影响。
Sci Rep. 2020 Jul 21;10(1):12011. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-68785-7.
10
Climate change and ecosystems: threats, opportunities and solutions.气候变化与生态系统:威胁、机遇与解决方案。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2020 Mar 16;375(1794):20190104. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0104. Epub 2020 Jan 27.