Li S, Liu S Y, Zhao Y Q, Li Q Y, Liu D Y, Liu Z C, Li D S, Zeng L, Ge Q G, Ma Q B, Shen N
Department of Emergency Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China.
Department of Radiology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China.
Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi. 2021 Mar 12;44(3):230-236. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112147-20200522-00626.
To explore a modified CT scoring system, its feasibility for disease severity evaluation and its predictive value in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients. This study was a multi-center retrospective cohort study. Patients confirmed with COVID-19 were recruited in three medical centers located in Beijing, Wuhan and Nanchang from January 27, 2020 to March 8, 2020. Demographics, clinical data, and CT images were collected. CT were analyzed by two emergency physicians of more than ten years' work experience independently through a modified scoring system. Final score was determined by average score from the two reviewers if consensus was not reached. The lung was divided into 6 zones (upper, middle, and lower on both sides) by the level of trachea carina and the level of lower pulmonary veins. The target lesion types included ground-glass opacity (GGO), consolidation, overall lung involvement, and crazy-paving pattern. Bronchiectasis, cavity, pleural effusion, etc., were not included in CT reading and analysis because of low incidence. The reviewers evaluated the extent of the targeted patterns (GGO, consolidation) and overall affected lung parenchyma for each zone, using Likert scale, ranging from 0-4 (0=absent; 1=1%-25%; 2=26%-50%; 3=51%-75%; 4=76%-100%). Thus, GGO score, consolidation score, and overall lung involvement score were sum of 6 zones ranging from 0-24. For crazy-paving pattern, it was only coded as absent or present (0 or 1) for each zone and therefore ranging from 0-6. A total of 197 patients from 3 medical centers and 522 CT scans entered final analysis. The median age of the patients was 64 years, and 54.8% were male. There were 76(38.8%) patients had hypertension and 30(15.3%) patients had diabetes mellitus. There were 75 of the patients classified as moderate cases, as well as 95 severe cases and 27 critical cases. As initial symptom, dry cough occurred in 170 patients, 134 patients had fever, and 125 patients had dyspnea. Reparatory rate, oxygen saturation, lymphocyte count and CURB 65 score on admission day varied among patients with different disease severity scale. There were 50 of the patients suffered from deterioration during hospital stay. The median time consumed for each CT by clinicians was 86.5 seconds. Cronbach's alpha for GGO, consolidation, crazy-paving pattern, and overall lung involvement between two clinicians were 0.809, 0.712, 0.678, and 0.906, respectively, showing good or excellent inter-rater correlation. There were 193 (98.0%) patients had GGO, 147 (74.6%) had consolidation, and 126(64.0%) had crazy-paving pattern throughout clinical course. Bilateral lung involvement was observed in 183(92.9%) patients. Median time of interval for CT scan in our study was 7 days so that the whole clinical course was divided into stages by week for further analysis. From the second week on, the CT scores of various types of lesions in severe or critically patients were higher than those of moderate cases. After the fifth week, the course of disease entered the recovery period. The CT score of the upper lung zones was lower than that of other zones in moderate and severe cases. Similar distribution was not observed in critical patients. For moderate cases, the ground glass opacity score at the second week had predictive value for the escalation of the severity classification during hospitalization. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.849, the best cut-off value was 5 points, with sensitivity of 84.2% and specificity of 75.0%. It is feasible for clinicians to use the modified semi-quantitative CT scoring system to evaluate patients with COVID-19. Severe/critical patients had higher scores for ground glass opacity, consolidation, crazy-paving pattern, and overall lung involvement than moderate cases. The ground glass opacity score in the second week had an optimal predictive value for escalation of disease severity during hospitalization in moderate patients on admission. The frequency of CT scan should be reduced after entering the recovery stage.
探索一种改良的CT评分系统、其用于评估疾病严重程度的可行性及其对2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)患者的预测价值。本研究为一项多中心回顾性队列研究。2020年1月27日至2020年3月8日期间,在北京、武汉和南昌的三个医疗中心招募确诊为COVID-19的患者。收集人口统计学资料、临床数据和CT图像。由两名具有十多年工作经验的急诊医师通过改良评分系统对CT进行独立分析。若未达成共识,则由两名审阅者的平均分确定最终分数。以气管隆突水平和肺下静脉水平将肺分为6个区域(双侧的上、中、下区域)。目标病变类型包括磨玻璃影(GGO)、实变、全肺受累及铺路石样改变。支气管扩张、空洞、胸腔积液等因发病率低未纳入CT阅片及分析。审阅者使用Likert量表(范围为0 - 4,0 = 无;1 = 1% - 25%;2 = 26% - 50%;3 = 51% - 75%;4 = 76% - 100%)评估每个区域内目标病变模式(GGO、实变)的范围及整体受累肺实质情况。因此,GGO评分、实变评分和全肺受累评分是6个区域评分之和,范围为0 - 24。对于铺路石样改变,每个区域仅记录为存在或不存在(0或1),因此范围为0 - 6。来自3个医疗中心的197例患者及522份CT扫描进入最终分析。患者的中位年龄为64岁,54.8%为男性。76例(38.8%)患者患有高血压,30例(15.3%)患者患有糖尿病。75例患者被分类为中度病例,95例为重度病例,27例为危重症病例。作为初始症状,170例患者出现干咳,134例患者发热,125例患者出现呼吸困难。入院当天不同疾病严重程度分级患者的呼吸频率、血氧饱和度、淋巴细胞计数及CURB - 65评分各不相同。50例患者在住院期间病情恶化。临床医生对每次CT的中位阅片时间为86.5秒。两名临床医生之间GGO、实变、铺路石样改变及全肺受累的Cronbach's α分别为0.809、0.712、0.678和0.906,显示出良好或极好的评分者间相关性。整个临床过程中,193例(占98.0%)患者有GGO,147例(占74.6%)有实变,126例(占64.0%)有铺路石样改变。183例(占92.9%)患者观察到双侧肺受累。本研究中CT扫描的中位间隔时间为7天,因此将整个临床过程按周分期以进行进一步分析。从第二周起,重度或危重症患者各类病变的CT评分高于中度病例。第五周后,病程进入恢复期。中度和重度病例中,上肺区域的CT评分低于其他区域。危重症患者未观察到类似分布。对于中度病例,第二周的磨玻璃影评分对住院期间严重程度分级的升级有预测价值。受试者工作特征曲线下面积为0.849,最佳截断值为5分,灵敏度为84.2%,特异度为75.0%。临床医生使用改良的半定量CT评分系统评估COVID-19患者是可行的。重度/危重症患者的磨玻璃影、实变、铺路石样改变及全肺受累评分高于中度病例。入院时中度患者第二周的磨玻璃影评分对住院期间疾病严重程度升级具有最佳预测价值。进入恢复期后应减少CT扫描频率。