• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

贝叶斯分层评估在临床试验筛选中花生过敏的剂量反应。

Bayesian hierarchical evaluation of dose-response for peanut allergy in clinical trial screening.

机构信息

University of Cincinnati, Department of Environmental and Public Health Sciences, 160 Panzeca Way, Cincinnati, OH, 45267, USA.

University of Cincinnati, Department of Environmental and Public Health Sciences, 160 Panzeca Way, Cincinnati, OH, 45267, USA.

出版信息

Food Chem Toxicol. 2021 May;151:112125. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2021.112125. Epub 2021 Mar 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.fct.2021.112125
PMID:33722597
Abstract

Risk-based labeling based on the minimal eliciting doses (EDs) in sensitized populations is a potential replacement for precautionary allergen labeling of food allergens. We estimated the dose-response distribution for peanut allergen using data from double-blind placebo-controlled food challenges (DBPCFCs) conducted in the US at multiple sites, testing a population believed to be similar to the general U.S. food allergic population. Our final (placebo-adjusted) dataset included 548 challenges of 481 subjects. Bayesian hierarchical analysis facilitated model fitting, and accounted for variability associated with various levels of data organization. The data are best described using a complex hierarchical structure that accounts for inter-individual variability and variability across study locations or substudies. Bayesian model averaging could simultaneously consider the fit of multiple models, but the Weibull model dominated so strongly that model averaging was not needed. The ED01 and ED05 (and 95% credible intervals) are 0.052 (0.021, 0.13) and 0.49 (0.22, 0.97) mg peanut protein, respectively. Accounting for challenges with severe reactions at the LOAEL, by using the dose prior to the LOAEL as the new LOAEL, the ED01 drops to 0.029 (0.014, 0.074) mg peanut protein. Our results could aid in establishing improved food labeling guidelines in the management of food allergies.

摘要

基于致敏人群中最小激发剂量(ED)的风险标注,是替代过敏原预防性标注食物过敏原的一种潜在方法。我们使用来自美国多个地点进行的双盲安慰剂对照食物挑战(DBPCFC)的数据,对花生过敏原的剂量反应分布进行了估计,这些试验的人群被认为与一般美国食物过敏人群相似。我们的最终(安慰剂调整)数据集包括了 481 名受试者的 548 次挑战。贝叶斯分层分析有助于模型拟合,并考虑了与各种数据组织水平相关的可变性。该数据最好使用复杂的层次结构来描述,该结构可以解释个体间的可变性以及不同研究地点或子研究之间的可变性。贝叶斯模型平均可以同时考虑多个模型的拟合,但威布尔模型占据主导地位,因此不需要模型平均。ED01 和 ED05(和 95%可信区间)分别为 0.052(0.021,0.13)和 0.49(0.22,0.97)mg 花生蛋白。通过使用 LOAEL 之前的剂量作为新的 LOAEL,考虑到 LOAEL 处严重反应的挑战,ED01 下降至 0.029(0.014,0.074)mg 花生蛋白。我们的结果可以帮助制定改善食物过敏管理的食品标签指南。

相似文献

1
Bayesian hierarchical evaluation of dose-response for peanut allergy in clinical trial screening.贝叶斯分层评估在临床试验筛选中花生过敏的剂量反应。
Food Chem Toxicol. 2021 May;151:112125. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2021.112125. Epub 2021 Mar 12.
2
Peanut Allergen Threshold Study (PATS): Novel single-dose oral food challenge study to validate eliciting doses in children with peanut allergy.花生过敏原阈值研究(PATS):一项新的单剂量口服食物挑战研究,旨在验证花生过敏儿童的激发剂量。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017 May;139(5):1583-1590. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2017.01.030. Epub 2017 Feb 24.
3
Using data from food challenges to inform management of consumers with food allergy: A systematic review with individual participant data meta-analysis.利用食物激发试验数据为食物过敏消费者的管理提供信息:一项基于个体参与者数据的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2021 Jun;147(6):2249-2262.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2021.01.025. Epub 2021 Feb 9.
4
Effect of Varying Doses of Epicutaneous Immunotherapy vs Placebo on Reaction to Peanut Protein Exposure Among Patients With Peanut Sensitivity: A Randomized Clinical Trial.不同剂量表皮免疫疗法与安慰剂对花生敏感患者花生蛋白暴露反应的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2017 Nov 14;318(18):1798-1809. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.16591.
5
Effect of Epicutaneous Immunotherapy vs Placebo on Reaction to Peanut Protein Ingestion Among Children With Peanut Allergy: The PEPITES Randomized Clinical Trial.表皮免疫治疗与安慰剂对花生过敏儿童进食花生蛋白反应的影响:PEPITES 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2019 Mar 12;321(10):946-955. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.1113.
6
The eliciting dose of peanut in double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenges decreases with increasing age and specific IgE level in children and young adults.在儿童和青年人群中,双盲、安慰剂对照食物激发试验中花生的激发剂量随年龄和特异性 IgE 水平的增加而降低。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011 Nov;128(5):1031-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2011.07.050. Epub 2011 Aug 31.
7
Thresholds of clinical reactivity to milk, egg, peanut and sesame in immunoglobulin E-dependent allergies: evaluation by double-blind or single-blind placebo-controlled oral challenges.免疫球蛋白E介导的牛奶、鸡蛋、花生和芝麻过敏的临床反应阈值:通过双盲或单盲安慰剂对照口服激发试验进行评估。
Clin Exp Allergy. 2003 Aug;33(8):1046-51. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2222.2003.01734.x.
8
Efficacy and safety of oral immunotherapy with AR101 in European children with a peanut allergy (ARTEMIS): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial.AR101 口服免疫治疗欧洲花生过敏儿童的疗效和安全性(ARTEMIS):一项多中心、双盲、随机、安慰剂对照 3 期试验。
Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2020 Oct;4(10):728-739. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(20)30234-0. Epub 2020 Jul 20.
9
The distribution of individual threshold doses eliciting allergic reactions in a population with peanut allergy.在花生过敏人群中引发过敏反应的个体阈值剂量分布。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2002 Dec;110(6):915-20. doi: 10.1067/mai.2002.129235.
10
AR101 Oral Immunotherapy for Peanut Allergy.AR101 口服免疫疗法治疗花生过敏。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Nov 22;379(21):1991-2001. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1812856. Epub 2018 Nov 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of a Predictive Statistical Pharmacological Model for Local Anesthetic Agent Effects with Bayesian Hierarchical Model Parameter Estimation.基于贝叶斯分层模型参数估计的局部麻醉药效应预测统计药理模型的开发。
Medicines (Basel). 2023 Nov 15;10(11):61. doi: 10.3390/medicines10110061.
2
Trends in Food Allergy Research, Regulations and Patient Care.食物过敏研究、法规与患者护理的趋势
Nutr Today. 2022 Mar-Apr;57(2):64-69. doi: 10.1097/NT.0000000000000530. Epub 2022 Mar 23.