Cohen Jérémie F, Deeks Jonathan J, Hooft Lotty, Salameh Jean-Paul, Korevaar Daniël A, Gatsonis Constantine, Hopewell Sally, Hunt Harriet A, Hyde Chris J, Leeflang Mariska M, Macaskill Petra, McGrath Trevor A, Moher David, Reitsma Johannes B, Rutjes Anne W S, Takwoingi Yemisi, Tonelli Marcello, Whiting Penny, Willis Brian H, Thombs Brett, Bossuyt Patrick M, McInnes Matthew D F
Department of Pediatrics and Inserm UMR 1153 (Centre of Research in Epidemiology and Statistics), Necker - Enfants Malades Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Université de Paris, Paris, France.
Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
BMJ. 2021 Mar 15;372:n265. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n265.
For many users of the biomedical literature, abstracts may be the only source of information about a study. Hence, abstracts should allow readers to evaluate the objectives, key design features, and main results of the study. Several evaluations have shown deficiencies in the reporting of journal and conference abstracts across study designs and research fields, including systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy studies. Incomplete reporting compromises the value of research to key stakeholders. The authors of this article have developed a 12 item checklist of preferred reporting items for journal and conference abstracts of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA for Abstracts). This article presents the checklist, examples of complete reporting, and explanations for each item of PRISMA-DTA for Abstracts.
对于许多生物医学文献的使用者来说，摘要可能是关于一项研究的唯一信息来源。因此，摘要应使读者能够评估研究的目的、关键设计特征和主要结果。多项评估表明，跨研究设计和研究领域的期刊及会议摘要报告存在缺陷，包括诊断试验准确性研究的系统评价。报告不完整会损害研究对关键利益相关者的价值。本文作者制定了一份包含12项条目的清单，用于规范诊断试验准确性研究的系统评价和荟萃分析的期刊及会议摘要的首选报告项目（诊断试验准确性系统评价和荟萃分析摘要的PRISMA-DTA清单）。本文展示了该清单、完整报告的示例以及对PRISMA-DTA清单各项目的解释。
