Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery RT, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Department of Nephrology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 Sep 11;60(3):710-716. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezab127.
The commonly used cardiac surgery risk scores, European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II and Society of Thoracic Surgeons score, are inaccurate in predicting mortality in the ageing patient population and do not include the biological age. This requests a need for a new risk score incorporating frailty. The aim of this study was to compare the prediction of mortality and the additive effect of comprehensive assessment of frailty score and the shortened version, frailty predicts death one year after elective cardiac surgery test on the existing risk scores.
Six hundred four patients undergoing cardiac surgery and aged ≥65 years were included in this prospective observational study. These frailty scores are based on minor physical tests. We compared these frailty score predictions of mortality and their added value to the existing risk scores evaluated by concordance-statistics (C-statistics), integrated discrimination improvement and net reclassification improvement.
The median age was 73 years (21% female). C-statistics showed that comprehensive assessment of frailty score with a value of 0.69, frailty predicts death one year after elective cardiac surgery test 0.68, Society of Thoracic Surgeons score 0.70 and European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation 0.64. Frailty assessment, added to the existing risk scores, significantly improved integrated discrimination improvement up to 0.05, and net reclassification improvement up to 0.04. Frailty assessment also increased the C-statistics, but this did not reach statistical significance.
Frailty scores are as good as the existing risk scores for the prediction of mortality in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Added to the existing scores, frailty assessment improves the C-statistics and integrated discrimination improvement over time.
NCT02992587.
欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统 II 评分和胸外科医师学会评分等常用心脏手术风险评分在预测老年患者人群的死亡率方面不够准确,并且不包括生物年龄。这就需要一个新的包含脆弱性的风险评分。本研究旨在比较综合评估脆弱性评分和简化版(脆弱性预测一年后择期心脏手术后死亡测试)对死亡率的预测以及对现有风险评分的附加效应。
本前瞻性观察研究纳入了 604 名接受心脏手术且年龄≥65 岁的患者。这些脆弱性评分基于小的物理测试。我们比较了这些脆弱性评分对死亡率的预测及其对现有风险评分的附加价值,评估指标包括一致性统计(C 统计量)、综合鉴别改善和净重新分类改善。
中位年龄为 73 岁(21%为女性)。C 统计量显示,全面评估脆弱性评分的价值为 0.69,脆弱性预测一年后择期心脏手术后死亡的测试值为 0.68,胸外科医师学会评分值为 0.70,欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统为 0.64。将脆弱性评估添加到现有风险评分中,显著提高了综合鉴别改善,最高可达 0.05,净重新分类改善最高可达 0.04。脆弱性评估也提高了 C 统计量,但这并未达到统计学意义。
在预测接受心脏手术的患者的死亡率方面,脆弱性评分与现有风险评分一样好。将脆弱性评估添加到现有评分中,随着时间的推移,C 统计量和综合鉴别改善都得到了提高。
NCT02992587。