Department of Anaesthesia & Pain Medicine, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Department of Statistics, School of Population Health & Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, UK.
Br J Anaesth. 2022 Jun;128(6):949-958. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2022.03.015. Epub 2022 Apr 21.
Preoperative frailty may predispose patients to poorer outcomes in cardiac surgery; however, there are limited data concerning how preoperative frailty predicts patient-centred outcomes, such as patient-reported disability. Our objective was to evaluate the association between preoperative frailty and postoperative disability.
Patients were prospectively evaluated using the Comprehensive Assessment of Frailty score, separating patients into frail and non-frail cohorts. Disability levels were quantified using the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 in percentage of the maximum disability score, with disability defined as a value ≥25%.
Frail patients had increased median [inter-quartile range] disability scores of 31 [16-45]% preoperatively, 29 [9-54]% at 1 month, and 15 [3-31]% at 3 months postoperatively, compared with disability scores in non-frail patients of 10 [5-17]%, 17 [6-29]%, and 2.1 [0-12.0]%, respectively. Preoperative frailty was associated with a reduced likelihood of patients being free of disability and alive at 3 months; adjusted odds ratio 0.51 (for age, European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II, and WHODAS 2.0: 12-Part Questionnaire score); P=0.045. The trajectory of disability scores, assessed in percentage change from the preoperative baseline, showed non-frail patients had increased disability burden at 1 month, whereas frail patients had reduced disability burden (+4.2% vs -2.1%; P=0.04). Although the disability burden decreased for both groups at 3 months, this was most marked for frail patients (-6.3% vs -10.4%; P=0.02).
Disability burden in frail patients improves continuously postoperatively, whereas in non-frail patients, it worsens at 1 month before improving at 3 months postoperatively. This positive trajectory of patient-centred outcomes in frail patients should be considered in preoperative decision-making.
术前虚弱可能使患者在心脏手术后出现更差的结果;然而,关于术前虚弱如何预测以患者为中心的结局,如患者报告的残疾,相关数据有限。我们的目的是评估术前虚弱与术后残疾之间的关系。
前瞻性地使用全面虚弱评估评分评估患者,将患者分为虚弱和非虚弱队列。使用世界卫生组织残疾评估表(WHODAS)2.0 以最大残疾评分的百分比量化残疾程度,残疾定义为≥25%的值。
与非虚弱患者的残疾评分分别为 10%[5-17%]、17%[6-29%]和 2.1%[0-12.0%]相比,虚弱患者术前残疾评分中位数(四分位距)为 31%[16-45%],术后 1 个月时为 29%[9-54%],术后 3 个月时为 15%[3-31%]。术前虚弱与 3 个月时无残疾和存活患者的可能性降低相关;调整后的优势比为 0.51(针对年龄、欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统 II 和 WHODAS 2.0:12 项问卷评分);P=0.045。残疾评分的轨迹,以从术前基线的百分比变化评估,显示非虚弱患者在 1 个月时残疾负担增加,而虚弱患者的残疾负担减少(+4.2%比-2.1%;P=0.04)。尽管两组患者在 3 个月时残疾负担均有所下降,但虚弱患者的下降幅度最大(-6.3%比-10.4%;P=0.02)。
虚弱患者的残疾负担在术后持续改善,而非虚弱患者在术后 1 个月时恶化,然后在术后 3 个月时改善。虚弱患者以患者为中心的结局的这种积极轨迹应在术前决策中考虑。