Department of Nursing, National Tainan Junior College of Nursing, Tainan City, Taiwan, ROC.
Institute of Allied Health Sciences, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
Australas J Ageing. 2021 Dec;40(4):e294-e300. doi: 10.1111/ajag.12942. Epub 2021 Mar 16.
To compare the psychometric properties of different short versions of the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) among community-dwelling widowed older people.
A cross-sectional design was conducted between February 2018 and August 2019 in southern Taiwan (n = 330). The GDS short versions included Hoyl et al's 5-item version, Molloy et al's 5-item version and van Marwijk et al's 4-item version.
All GDS short versions had satisfactory internal consistency (α = 0.83-0.90), with strong item loading embedded in the same construct of depression (0.43-0.72). The activity of daily living (ADL) scores had strong associations with van Marwijk et al's 4-item version (absolute standardised coefficient [|β|] = 0.15-0.59), Hoyl et al's 5-item version (|β| = 0.16-0.45) and Molloy et al's 4-item version (|β| = 0.09-0.40).
Hoyl et al's 5-item version was found to be more suitable than the other two versions of the GDS to assess the precise construct of depression. Meanwhile, van Marwijk et al's 4-item version can be used when the focus is on ADL performance. However, the conclusion should be interpreted with caution since the results were derived only from a widowed population in Taiwan. More research on this topic among other populations is thus needed to corroborate our conclusion.
比较不同简版老年抑郁量表(GDS)在社区丧偶老年人中的心理计量特性。
2018 年 2 月至 2019 年 8 月在台湾南部进行了一项横断面设计(n=330)。GDS 短版本包括 Hoyl 等人的 5 项版本、Molloy 等人的 5 项版本和 van Marwijk 等人的 4 项版本。
所有 GDS 短版本均具有令人满意的内部一致性(α=0.83-0.90),并且在同一抑郁结构中具有较强的项目负荷(0.43-0.72)。日常生活活动(ADL)评分与 van Marwijk 等人的 4 项版本(绝对标准化系数[|β|]为 0.15-0.59)、Hoyl 等人的 5 项版本(|β|为 0.16-0.45)和 Molloy 等人的 4 项版本(|β|为 0.09-0.40)具有强烈关联。
与 GDS 的其他两个版本相比,发现 Hoyl 等人的 5 项版本更适合评估抑郁的精确结构。同时,当重点放在 ADL 表现上时,可以使用 van Marwijk 等人的 4 项版本。然而,由于结果仅来自台湾的丧偶人群,因此应谨慎解释该结论。需要在其他人群中对此主题进行更多研究以证实我们的结论。