Weeks Sandra Kenney, McGann Paul E, Michaels Teresa King, Penninx Brenda W J H
North Carolina Baptist Hospital, Wake Forest University, Baptist Medical Center, Winston Salem, NC, USA.
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2003;35(2):133-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2003.00133.x.
To compare three published short GDS scales and to identify a valid and reliable short-form alternative to the 15-item Geriatric Depression Scale.
Comparative validation study via retrospective chart review of 816 acute care patients in an 830-bed academic medical center in the USA in 2001.
Data of the 15-item Geriatric Depression Scale, the Mini-Mental State Examination, and demographic data were extracted from medical records after patient discharge. Three scales: the D'Ath GDS-4, van Marwijk GDS-4, and Hoyl GDS-5, were compared to the 15-item Geriatric Depression Scale.
The Hoyl 5-item version showed the highest sensitivity (97.9%). Concern for GDS-5 false positives when compared to the 15-item GDS (specificity 72.7%) led to re-ordering the 15 GDS items into a new two-tiered instrument, the GDS-5/15. In this study of 816 older adult inpatients, 60% were screened as "not depressed" using the first 5 items on the GDS-5/15, leaving 40% for continued screening and completion of all 15 GDS items.
A shorter screening tool might encourage more providers to add depression screening to routine health care visits. The GDS-5/15 is an alternative screening tool.
比较三种已发表的简短老年抑郁量表(GDS),并确定一种有效且可靠的15项老年抑郁量表的简短替代形式。
2001年,通过对美国一家拥有830张床位的学术医疗中心的816名急性病患者的病历进行回顾性审查,开展比较验证研究。
患者出院后,从病历中提取15项老年抑郁量表、简易精神状态检查表及人口统计学数据。将三种量表:达思GDS - 4、范马维克GDS - 4和霍伊尔GDS - 5与15项老年抑郁量表进行比较。
霍伊尔5项版本显示出最高的敏感性(97.9%)。与15项GDS相比,对GDS - 5假阳性的担忧(特异性72.7%)导致将15项GDS条目重新排序为一种新的两层工具,即GDS - 5/15。在这项对816名老年住院患者的研究中,使用GDS - 5/15的前5项,60%的患者被筛查为“无抑郁”,剩下40%的患者继续接受筛查并完成全部15项GDS条目。
更简短的筛查工具可能会促使更多医疗服务提供者在常规医疗就诊时增加抑郁筛查。GDS - 5/15是一种替代筛查工具。