Instituto de Ciencias Agropecuarias y Rurales (ICAR), Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México (UAEM), Campus UAEM El Cerrillo, Toluca, C.P. 50090, Estado de México, México.
Centro de Investigacions Agrarias de Mabegondo (CIAM) de la Axencia Galega da Calidade Alimentaria, Betanzos a Mesón do Vento, 15318 Mabegondo-Abegondo, A Coruña, Galicia, Spain.
Trop Anim Health Prod. 2021 Mar 16;53(2):208. doi: 10.1007/s11250-021-02658-7.
Small-scale dairy systems are important contributors to national milk supplies in many areas of the world, and an option to ameliorate rural poverty in developing countries. In Mexico, they comprise over 78% of dairy farms. These systems must be sustainable in order to persist in the future. By applying several methods to assess the sustainability of farms, valuable information is collected on the practical, operational, and systemic requirements, as well as an insight into the difficulties in the use of each tool in practice. The objective was to assess the sustainability of small-scale dairy systems during the rainy season. Three methods were compared (IDEA, RISE, and SAFA) to evaluate their ability to deal with such systems in the Mexican context. Ten small-scale dairy farms were assessed from June to November 2018. Monthly semi-structured interviews were applied to collect economic, social, and environmental information. The three methods met criteria for on-farm assessments, with no large differences among them. The IDEA method was more applicable in the context of small-scale dairy systems because its indicators may be collected on-farm and were easy to measure. RISE requires more specialized technical information not always available at the small-scale farm level, and SAFA covered the largest number of indicators but is better suited for large-scale systems. The IDEA and RISE methods are adequate tools to assess the sustainability of small-scale dairy systems. The mean overall sustainability score over the three methods for the 10 assessed farms was 55.3±5.7 over 100. This medium level of sustainability indicates areas of opportunity to enhance the sustainability of small-scale dairy systems.
小规模奶牛养殖系统在世界许多地区都是国家牛奶供应的重要组成部分,也是发展中国家农村脱贫的一种选择。在墨西哥,它们占奶牛养殖场的 78%以上。为了在未来能够持续存在,这些系统必须是可持续的。通过应用多种方法来评估农场的可持续性,可以收集到有关实际、运营和系统要求的有价值信息,并深入了解每种工具在实践中的使用困难。本研究的目的是评估雨季小规模奶牛养殖系统的可持续性。比较了三种方法(IDEA、RISE 和 SAFA),以评估它们在墨西哥背景下处理此类系统的能力。2018 年 6 月至 11 月评估了 10 个小规模奶牛养殖场。每月进行半结构化访谈,以收集经济、社会和环境信息。这三种方法都符合农场评估的标准,它们之间没有很大的差异。IDEA 方法更适用于小规模奶牛养殖系统,因为其指标可以在农场收集,并且易于测量。RISE 需要更多专门的技术信息,而这些信息并不总是在小规模农场层面上可用,而 SAFA 涵盖了最多的指标,但更适合大规模系统。IDEA 和 RISE 方法是评估小规模奶牛养殖系统可持续性的合适工具。这三种方法对 10 个评估农场的整体可持续性平均得分为 100 分中的 55.3±5.7。这种中等水平的可持续性表明,有机会加强小规模奶牛养殖系统的可持续性。