• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在银屑病临床实践中记录患者数据——支持银屑病专家决策的患者焦点小组

Documenting Patient Data in Psoriasis Clinical Practice-Patient Focus Groups Supporting Psoriasis Experts' Decision-making.

作者信息

Otten Marina, Augustin Matthias

机构信息

German Center for Health Services Research in Dermatology (CVderm), Institute for Health Services Research in Dermatology and Nursing (IVDP), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

Patient Prefer Adherence. 2021 Mar 8;15:549-557. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S297569. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.2147/PPA.S297569
PMID:33727800
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7953889/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

This article presents patients' attitudes about documenting patient data and outcome measures in psoriasis clinical practice to support a Delphi approach of psoriasis experts to develop a standard data set.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted three focus groups with 14 patients in a German outpatient unit for psoriasis. The focus was to explore reasons for and against the documentation of single variables concerning personal, anamnesis, clinical, patient-reported outcomes, and other data.

RESULTS

The patients mainly discussed if a variable has an impact on the disease or treatment decision, or if there might be a practical value from experiences with treatments when documented. In addition, in their point of view, patient-reported outcome data are important to document as it enables physicians to learn about a patient's subjective burden of disease. Patient education and the involvement of other physicians in the treatment process also emerged as relevant aspects.

CONCLUSION

The results help to understand patients' preferences on documenting patient data and their idea of an exhaustive doctor-patient consultation to improve doctor-patient communication, disease monitoring, and quality of care.

摘要

背景与目的

本文介绍了患者对银屑病临床实践中记录患者数据和结局指标的态度,以支持银屑病专家采用德尔菲法制定标准数据集。

患者与方法

我们在德国一家银屑病门诊单位对14名患者进行了三组焦点小组访谈。重点是探讨支持和反对记录个人、既往史、临床、患者报告结局及其他数据等单一变量的原因。

结果

患者主要讨论了某个变量是否对疾病或治疗决策有影响,或者记录下来的治疗经验是否可能具有实际价值。此外,在他们看来,记录患者报告的结局数据很重要,因为这能让医生了解患者的主观疾病负担。患者教育以及其他医生参与治疗过程也被视为相关方面。

结论

这些结果有助于理解患者在记录患者数据方面的偏好,以及他们对详尽医患咨询的看法,从而改善医患沟通、疾病监测和医疗质量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f231/7953889/2fe76a4284dd/PPA-15-549-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f231/7953889/2c04c89851cc/PPA-15-549-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f231/7953889/2fe76a4284dd/PPA-15-549-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f231/7953889/2c04c89851cc/PPA-15-549-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f231/7953889/2fe76a4284dd/PPA-15-549-g0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Documenting Patient Data in Psoriasis Clinical Practice-Patient Focus Groups Supporting Psoriasis Experts' Decision-making.在银屑病临床实践中记录患者数据——支持银屑病专家决策的患者焦点小组
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2021 Mar 8;15:549-557. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S297569. eCollection 2021.
2
Documentation of psoriasis in routine care - expert consensus on a German data set.日常护理中的银屑病记录-德国数据集的专家共识。
J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2021 Oct;19(10):1463-1475. doi: 10.1111/ddg.14547. Epub 2021 Oct 7.
3
A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care settings.对所有医疗环境中共同决策的内部和外部影响进行的定性系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(58):4633-4646. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-432.
4
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
5
The effectiveness of health literacy interventions on the informed consent process of health care users: a systematic review protocol.健康素养干预措施对医疗保健使用者知情同意过程的有效性:一项系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):82-94. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2304.
6
Advance directives for seriously ill hospitalized patients: effectiveness with the patient self-determination act and the SUPPORT intervention. SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment.重症住院患者的预立医疗指示:《患者自主决定法案》及SUPPORT干预措施的效果。SUPPORT研究人员。了解治疗结果和风险的预后及偏好研究。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1997 Apr;45(4):500-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1997.tb05178.x.
7
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
8
A patient-centred approach to biological treatment decision making for psoriasis: an expert consensus.银屑病生物治疗决策的以患者为中心方法:专家共识
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2015 Dec;29(12):2390-8. doi: 10.1111/jdv.13248. Epub 2015 Sep 14.
9
Can patient-reported outcome measures be used to predict consultation needs in patients with psoriasis?: A survey study.患者报告的结局指标能否用于预测银屑病患者的就诊需求?一项调查研究。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2022 Jul 23;6(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s41687-022-00490-7.
10
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Development, Feasibility, and Acceptability of the Electronic Patient Benefit Index for Psoriasis in Clinical Practice: Mixed Methods Study.电子银屑病患者获益指数在临床实践中的开发、可行性和可接受性:混合方法研究。
JMIR Dermatol. 2024 Aug 9;7:e54762. doi: 10.2196/54762.

本文引用的文献

1
Patients' demographic and socioeconomic characteristics influence the therapeutic decision-making process in psoriasis.患者的人口统计学和社会经济学特征影响着银屑病的治疗决策过程。
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 12;15(8):e0237267. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237267. eCollection 2020.
2
Patient-reported outcomes are important elements of psoriasis treatment decision making: A discrete choice experiment survey of dermatologists in the United States.患者报告的结局是银屑病治疗决策的重要组成部分:美国皮肤科医生的离散选择实验调查。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019 Jun;80(6):1650-1657. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.01.039. Epub 2019 Jan 29.
3
A novel approach to outpatient clinic management.
一种门诊管理的新方法。
Br J Dermatol. 2019 Jun;180(6):1560-1561. doi: 10.1111/bjd.17643. Epub 2019 Mar 20.
4
Shared Decision Making in Psoriasis: A Systematic Review of Quantitative and Qualitative Studies.银屑病中的共同决策:定量和定性研究的系统评价。
Am J Clin Dermatol. 2019 Feb;20(1):13-29. doi: 10.1007/s40257-018-0390-5.
5
How to weight patient-relevant treatment goals for assessing treatment benefit in psoriasis: preference elicitation methods vs. rating scales.如何权衡与患者相关的治疗目标,以评估银屑病的治疗获益:偏好 elicitation 方法与评分量表。
Arch Dermatol Res. 2018 Sep;310(7):567-577. doi: 10.1007/s00403-018-1846-4. Epub 2018 Jun 23.
6
Identifying a Core Domain Set to Assess Psoriasis in Clinical Trials.确定用于评估临床试验中银屑病的核心领域集。
JAMA Dermatol. 2018 Oct 1;154(10):1137-1144. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.1165.
7
Patient-relevant treatment goals in psoriasis.银屑病中与患者相关的治疗目标。
Arch Dermatol Res. 2016 Mar;308(2):69-78. doi: 10.1007/s00403-015-1613-8. Epub 2015 Dec 19.
8
The Harmonizing Outcome Measures for Eczema (HOME) roadmap: a methodological framework to develop core sets of outcome measurements in dermatology.特应性皮炎结局测量协调(HOME)路线图:制定皮肤病学核心结局测量集的方法学框架。
J Invest Dermatol. 2015 Jan;135(1):24-30. doi: 10.1038/jid.2014.320. Epub 2014 Sep 4.
9
Dimensions of patient needs in dermatology: subscales of the patient benefit index.皮肤科患者需求维度:患者获益指数的子量表。
Arch Dermatol Res. 2011 Jan;303(1):11-7. doi: 10.1007/s00403-010-1073-0. Epub 2010 Aug 17.
10
Spotlight on focus groups.聚焦小组访谈要点
Can Fam Physician. 2009 Feb;55(2):218-9.