• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

确定用于评估临床试验中银屑病的核心领域集。

Identifying a Core Domain Set to Assess Psoriasis in Clinical Trials.

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City.

Division of Rheumatology, Department of Dermatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

JAMA Dermatol. 2018 Oct 1;154(10):1137-1144. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.1165.

DOI:10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.1165
PMID:29874367
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6233740/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

There is no consensus on which domains should be measured or which instruments should be used in clinical trials for psoriasis therapies.

OBJECTIVE

To achieve international consensus among psoriasis stakeholders on a core set of domains that should be measured in all psoriasis clinical trials.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Literature review, pre-Delphi survey exercises, nominal group discussions, and audience voting at 4 stakeholder meetings were used to develop candidate domains for 2 rounds of a Delphi survey. Stakeholders were patients or advocates of patients with psoriasis and health care professionals (HCPs) with expertise in psoriasis, including physicians, scientists, advocacy organization representatives, and regulators. Delphi surveys were conducted electronically from October through December 2015 and between September and October 2016. Stakeholder discussions with audience response voting were conducted at live meetings in the United States, Canada, and Italy from January 2013 to December 2016 to refine and ratify the core set of domains.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Two rounds of an electronic Delphi survey were used to determine consensus. A domain was considered "core" (ie, should be measured in all trials) if a threshold consensus of at least 70% was met in both patient and HCP groups. Domains meeting consensus in only 1 group were considered to be important but were not required to be measured in all trials ("middle ring"). These domains were included for rerating in round 2. Domains that did not meet consensus in either of the groups ("outer ring") were considered to be of uncertain importance and were placed in the research agenda.

RESULTS

In round 1 of the Delphi survey, 107 HCPs and 14 patients participated. Most HCPs (72 [67%]) were dermatologists between 46 and 64 years old (71 [66%]), white (78 [73%]), and male (75 [70%]) from North America (60 [57%]) and Europe (34 [32%]).There were 10 pharmaceutical industry clinical or health economic scientists, 3 advocacy organization representatives, 2 regulatory agency representatives, and 5 "other." In the second round, 77 HCPs and 15 patients participated. Of the 20 candidate domains, the following 6 met consensus as core domains: skin manifestations, psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis symptoms, health-related quality of life, investigator global assessment, patient global assessment, and treatment satisfaction. Secondary skin manifestations as well as nail, inverse, genital, and guttate psoriasis were classified as important but not mandatory. Psoriatic arthritis signs, work productivity or participation, economic impact (direct and indirect cost), and cardiovascular disease comprised the research agenda.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This iterative Delphi process yielded international consensus among professional and patient stakeholders on 6 domains that should be measured in all clinical trials for psoriasis. Future International Dermatology Outcome Measures group efforts will focus on development of a core outcome measurement set for psoriasis trials.

摘要

重要性

目前在银屑病治疗的临床试验中,对于应该测量哪些领域以及应该使用哪些工具,尚未达成共识。

目的

在银屑病利益相关者中达成共识,确定应在所有银屑病临床试验中测量的核心领域。

设计、设置和参与者:文献回顾、德尔菲调查前练习、名义小组讨论以及在 4 次利益相关者会议上的观众投票,用于开发两轮德尔菲调查的候选领域。利益相关者为银屑病患者或患者的倡导者以及具有银屑病专业知识的医疗保健专业人员(HCP),包括医生、科学家、倡导组织代表和监管机构。德尔菲调查于 2015 年 10 月至 12 月和 2016 年 9 月至 10 月之间以电子方式进行。2013 年 1 月至 2016 年 12 月期间,在美国、加拿大和意大利举行了利益相关者讨论和观众反应投票,以完善和批准核心领域。

主要结果和措施

两轮电子德尔菲调查用于确定共识。如果患者和 HCP 组都达到至少 70%的阈值共识,则认为该领域是“核心”(即,应在所有试验中进行测量)。仅在 1 组中达成共识的领域被认为是重要的,但不一定需要在所有试验中进行测量(“中环”)。这些领域将在第二轮中重新评估。在这两个组中都没有达成共识的领域(“外环”)被认为重要性不确定,将被列入研究议程。

结果

在第一轮德尔菲调查中,有 107 名 HCP 和 14 名患者参加。大多数 HCP(72 [67%])为 46 至 64 岁(71 [66%])、白人(78 [73%])和男性(75 [70%]),来自北美(60 [57%])和欧洲(34 [32%])。有 10 名制药行业临床或健康经济科学家、3 名倡导组织代表、2 名监管机构代表和 5 名“其他”。在第二轮中,有 77 名 HCP 和 15 名患者参加。在 20 个候选领域中,以下 6 个被确认为核心领域:皮肤表现、银屑病和银屑病关节炎症状、健康相关生活质量、研究者总体评估、患者总体评估和治疗满意度。次要皮肤表现以及指甲、反向、生殖器和点滴状银屑病被归类为重要但非强制性的。银屑病关节炎的体征、工作生产力或参与度、经济影响(直接和间接成本)和心血管疾病构成了研究议程。

结论和相关性

该迭代德尔菲过程在专业和患者利益相关者中就应在所有银屑病临床试验中测量的 6 个领域达成了共识。未来国际皮肤病学结局测量组的工作重点将是制定银屑病试验的核心结局测量集。

相似文献

1
Identifying a Core Domain Set to Assess Psoriasis in Clinical Trials.确定用于评估临床试验中银屑病的核心领域集。
JAMA Dermatol. 2018 Oct 1;154(10):1137-1144. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.1165.
2
Measuring psoriatic arthritis symptoms: A core domain in psoriasis clinical trials.评估银屑病关节炎症状:银屑病临床试验中的核心领域。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020 Jan;82(1):54-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.05.075. Epub 2019 Jun 1.
3
Achieving international consensus on the assessment of psoriatic arthritis in psoriasis clinical trials: an International Dermatology Outcome Measures (IDEOM) initiative.实现银屑病临床试验中对银屑病关节炎评估的国际共识:国际皮肤病学结局测量(IDEOM)倡议。
Arch Dermatol Res. 2018 Nov;310(9):701-710. doi: 10.1007/s00403-018-1855-3. Epub 2018 Aug 25.
4
Investigator and Patient Global Assessment Measures for Psoriasis Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review on Measurement Properties from the International Dermatology Outcome Measures (IDEOM) Initiative.银屑病临床试验的研究者和患者整体评估测量指标:来自国际皮肤病学结局测量(IDEOM)倡议的测量特性的系统评价。
Am J Clin Dermatol. 2020 Jun;21(3):323-338. doi: 10.1007/s40257-019-00496-w.
5
Core outcome set measurement for future clinical trials in acute myeloid leukemia: the HARMONY study protocol using a multi-stakeholder consensus-based Delphi process and a final consensus meeting.用于急性髓细胞白血病未来临床试验的核心结局测量:使用多利益相关者共识 Delphi 过程和最终共识会议的 HARMONY 研究方案。
Trials. 2020 May 27;21(1):437. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04384-1.
6
A core domain set for pyoderma gangrenosum trial outcomes: an international eDelphi and consensus study from the UPGRADE initiative.原发性坏疽性脓皮病试验结局的核心领域集:来自 UPGRADE 计划的国际 eDelphi 和共识研究。
Br J Dermatol. 2024 Feb 16;190(3):392-401. doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljad420.
7
Core Outcome Set for Actinic Keratosis Clinical Trials.光化性角化病临床试验的核心结局集。
JAMA Dermatol. 2020 Mar 1;156(3):326-333. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2019.4212.
8
A core domain set for hidradenitis suppurativa trial outcomes: an international Delphi process.化脓性汗腺炎临床试验结局的核心领域集:一项国际 Delphi 研究。
Br J Dermatol. 2018 Sep;179(3):642-650. doi: 10.1111/bjd.16672. Epub 2018 Jul 5.
9
Development of a core outcome set for clinical trials in basal cell carcinoma: study protocol for a systematic review of the literature and identification of a core outcome set using a Delphi survey.制定基底细胞癌临床试验的核心结局指标集:一项文献系统综述及运用德尔菲法确定核心结局指标集的研究方案
Trials. 2017 Oct 23;18(1):490. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2244-5.
10
A core outcome domain set to assess cutaneous neurofibromas related to neurofibromatosis type 1 in clinical trials.用于评估临床试验中与 1 型神经纤维瘤病相关的皮肤神经纤维瘤的核心结局领域集。
Br J Dermatol. 2024 Jan 23;190(2):216-225. doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljad397.

引用本文的文献

1
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Aug 6;8(8):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub7.
2
Validation of DermSat-7 for Assessing Treatment Satisfaction in Patients With Psoriasis.用于评估银屑病患者治疗满意度的DermSat-7验证
JAMA Dermatol. 2025 Feb 26;161(4):416-20. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.6567.
3
Assessing the uptake of infertility core outcome set in IVF randomized controlled trials.评估体外受精随机对照试验中不孕症核心结局集的采用情况。
Hum Reprod. 2025 Jan 1;40(1):85-95. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deae255.
4
Health-Related Quality of Life in Psoriasis: Literature Review.银屑病患者与健康相关的生活质量:文献综述
J Clin Med. 2024 Aug 7;13(16):4623. doi: 10.3390/jcm13164623.
5
Value-Based Healthcare: A Primer for the Dermatologist.基于价值的医疗保健:皮肤科医生入门指南。
Dermatology. 2024;240(5-6):814-822. doi: 10.1159/000539372. Epub 2024 Jun 27.
6
Cardiovascular Considerations and Implications for Treatment in Psoriasis: An Updated Review.心血管问题的考虑因素及对银屑病治疗的影响:最新综述。
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2024 May 10;20:215-229. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S464471. eCollection 2024.
7
Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Psoriasis: A Systematic Review.患者报告的银屑病患者健康相关生活质量结局测量指标:系统评价。
JAMA Dermatol. 2024 May 1;160(5):550-563. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2023.5439.
8
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药物治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jul 12;7(7):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub6.
9
Novel mixed-method, inclusive protocol involving global key stakeholders, including carers as experts, to co-develop relevant Caregiver-Reported Outcome Domains (CRODs) in skin disease.一种新型的混合方法,包括全球主要利益相关者,包括护理人员作为专家,共同制定与皮肤疾病相关的 caregiver 报告结局领域(CRODs)的包容性方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jan 18;13(1):e068893. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068893.
10
The Core Rehabilitation Outcome Set for Single-Sided Deafness (CROSSSD) study: International consensus on outcome measures for trials of interventions for adults with single-sided deafness.单侧聋核心康复结局集(CROSSSD)研究:成人单侧聋干预试验结局测量的国际共识。
Trials. 2022 Sep 8;23(1):764. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06702-1.

本文引用的文献

1
The COMET Handbook: version 1.0.《COMET手册:第1.0版》
Trials. 2017 Jun 20;18(Suppl 3):280. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1978-4.
2
The International Dermatology Outcome Measures (IDEOM) Initiative: A Review and Update.国际皮肤病学疗效评估指标(IDEOM)计划:综述与更新
J Drugs Dermatol. 2017 Feb 1;16(2):119-124.
3
The Psoriatic Disease Payer Advisory Panel.银屑病疾病支付方咨询小组
J Drugs Dermatol. 2016 May 1;15(5):641-4.
4
International Dermatology Outcome Measures Initiative as Applied to Psoriatic Disease Outcomes: An Update.应用于银屑病疾病结局的国际皮肤病学结局测量倡议:最新进展。
J Rheumatol. 2016 May;43(5):959-60. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.160114.
5
The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) and how to select an outcome measurement instrument.基于共识的健康测量仪器选择标准(COSMIN)以及如何选择结果测量仪器。
Braz J Phys Ther. 2016 Jan 19;20(2):105-13. doi: 10.1590/bjpt-rbf.2014.0143.
6
Report from the kick-off meeting of the Cochrane Skin Group Core Outcome Set Initiative (CSG-COUSIN).Cochrane 皮肤组核心结局集倡议(CSG-COUSIN)启动会议报告。
Br J Dermatol. 2016 Feb;174(2):287-95. doi: 10.1111/bjd.14337. Epub 2016 Jan 18.
7
The International Dermatology Outcome Measures Group: formation of patient-centered outcome measures in dermatology.国际皮肤病学结局测量研究组:皮肤病患者中心结局测量指标的制定。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015 Feb;72(2):345-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2014.11.002. Epub 2014 Dec 6.
8
The Harmonizing Outcome Measures for Eczema (HOME) roadmap: a methodological framework to develop core sets of outcome measurements in dermatology.特应性皮炎结局测量协调(HOME)路线图:制定皮肤病学核心结局测量集的方法学框架。
J Invest Dermatol. 2015 Jan;135(1):24-30. doi: 10.1038/jid.2014.320. Epub 2014 Sep 4.
9
The International Dermatology Outcome Measures initiative as applied to psoriatic disease outcomes: a report from the GRAPPA 2013 meeting.应用于银屑病疾病转归的国际皮肤病学转归指标倡议:来自GRAPPA 2013会议的报告
J Rheumatol. 2014 Jun;41(6):1227-9. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.140176.
10
Developing core outcome measurement sets for clinical trials: OMERACT filter 2.0.制定临床试验的核心结局测量集:OMERACT 筛选器 2.0。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Jul;67(7):745-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.11.013. Epub 2014 Feb 28.