Suppr超能文献

一项多位点评估揭示了东亚锹甲(鞘翅目,锹甲科)的两个新同物异名。

A multilocus assessment reveals two new synonymies for East Asian stag beetles (Coleoptera, Lucanidae).

作者信息

Yuan Jiao Jiao, Chen Dan, Wan Xia

机构信息

Department of Ecology, School of Resources and Engineering, Anhui University, 111 Jiulong Rd., Hefei 230601, China Anhui University Hefei China.

Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Wetland Ecosystem Protection and Restoration, Hefei 230601, China Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Wetland Ecosystem Protection and Restoration Hefei China.

出版信息

Zookeys. 2021 Mar 2;1021:65-79. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.1021.58832. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

Möllenkamp, 1912, Kriesche, 1921 and Fujita, 2010 are East Asian stag beetle species with long-debated taxonomic relationships due to high intraspecific morphological variability. In this study, we applied multilocus phylogenetic analyses to reassess their relationships. Two mitochondrial genes (16S rDNA, COI) and two nuclear genes (28S rDNA, Wingless) were used to reconstruct the phylogeny through the Bayesian inference (BI) and Maximum Likelihood (ML) methods. Both topologies supported two clades: the clade was sister to the clade ( + ) with the subclade embedded in the subclade . The Kimura 2-parameter (K2P) genetic distance analysis yielded a low mean value (≤0.035) among the three taxa, which was well below the minimum mean value between other species (≥0.122). We also compared the accuracy and efficiency of two approaches, GMYC and ABGD, in delimitating the three lineages. The result shows that ABGD is a better approach than GMYC. Our molecular data recognizes the three species as different populations of a single species, ranging from Taiwan Island to the continent. Therefore, we propose two new junior synonyms for : , and

摘要

默伦坎普(1912年)、克里舍(1921年)和藤田(2010年)所描述的东亚锹甲物种,由于种内形态变异较大,其分类关系长期以来一直存在争议。在本研究中,我们应用多基因座系统发育分析来重新评估它们之间的关系。使用两个线粒体基因(16S rDNA、COI)和两个核基因(28S rDNA、无翅基因),通过贝叶斯推断(BI)和最大似然法(ML)重建系统发育。两种拓扑结构都支持两个分支:分支 是分支( + )的姐妹分支,亚分支 嵌入在亚分支 中。Kimura 2-参数(K2P)遗传距离分析得出这三个分类单元之间的平均低值(≤0.035),远低于其他 物种之间的最小平均值(≥0.122)。我们还比较了GMYC和ABGD这两种方法在划分这三个谱系时的准确性和效率。结果表明,ABGD比GMYC是更好的方法。我们的分子数据将这三个物种识别为一个单一物种的不同种群,范围从台湾岛到大陆。因此,我们为 提出两个新的次异名: 和

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3eee/7943532/6d34dc61088c/zookeys-1021-065-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验