Suppr超能文献

新冠疫情相关的经济担忧是否会叠加健康担忧,从而降低德国民众对非药物干预措施的接受度?一项前瞻性预先注册研究。

Will COVID-19-related economic worries superimpose health worries, reducing nonpharmaceutical intervention acceptance in Germany? A prospective pre-registered study.

机构信息

Leibniz Institute for Psychology (ZPID), Universitätsring 15, Trier, Germany.

University of Erfurt, Erfurt, Germany.

出版信息

Int J Psychol. 2021 Aug;56(4):607-622. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12753. Epub 2021 Mar 16.

Abstract

Nonpharmaceutical interventions (NPI) such as stay-at-home orders aim at curbing the spread of the novel coronavirus, SARS-COV-2. In March 2020, a large proportion of the German population supported such interventions. In this article, we analyse whether the support for NPI dwindle with economic worries superimposing virus-related worries in the months to follow. We test seven pre-registered hypotheses using data from the German COSMO survey (Betsch, Wieler, Habersaat, et al. 2020), which regularly monitors behavioural and psychological factors related to the pandemic. The present article covers the period from March 24, 2020 to July 7, 2020 (N  = 13,094), and, in addition, includes a validation study providing evidence for the reliability and validity of the corresponding COSMO measures (N = 612). Results revealed that virus-related worries decreased over time, whereas economic worries remained largely constant. Moreover, the acceptance of NPIs considerably decreased over time. Virus-related worries were positively associated with acceptance of NPIs, whereas this relationship was negative regarding economic worries (albeit smaller and less consistent). Unexpectedly, no interactions between virus-related worries and economic worries were found. We conclude that individual differences in virus-related and economic threat perceptions related to COVID-19 play an important role in the acceptance of NPIs.

摘要

非药物干预(NPI),如居家令,旨在遏制新型冠状病毒 SARS-CoV-2 的传播。2020 年 3 月,很大一部分德国民众支持此类干预措施。在本文中,我们分析了随着与病毒相关的担忧被经济担忧所叠加,对 NPI 的支持是否会在接下来的几个月中减少。我们使用德国 COSMO 调查(Betsch、Wieler、Habersaat 等人,2020 年)的数据,通过七个预先注册的假设进行了测试,该调查定期监测与大流行相关的行为和心理因素。本文涵盖了 2020 年 3 月 24 日至 7 月 7 日的时间段(N=13094),此外,还包括一项验证研究,为相应的 COSMO 措施的可靠性和有效性提供了证据(N=612)。结果表明,病毒相关的担忧随着时间的推移而减少,而经济担忧则基本保持不变。此外,NPI 的接受程度也随着时间的推移而显著下降。病毒相关的担忧与对 NPI 的接受程度呈正相关,而与经济担忧的关系则呈负相关(尽管较小且不太一致)。出乎意料的是,没有发现病毒相关的担忧和经济担忧之间的相互作用。我们得出的结论是,与 COVID-19 相关的个体对病毒和经济威胁的感知差异在对 NPI 的接受程度中起着重要作用。

相似文献

4
COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and related fears and anxiety.新冠疫苗犹豫及其相关的恐惧和焦虑。
Int Immunopharmacol. 2021 Aug;97:107724. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2021.107724. Epub 2021 Apr 27.

引用本文的文献

3
Personal Protective Measures during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Germany.德国 COVID-19 大流行期间的个人防护措施。
Int J Infect Dis. 2022 Aug;121:177-183. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2022.05.036. Epub 2022 May 18.

本文引用的文献

4
Public acceptance of Covid-19 lockdown scenarios.公众对新冠疫情封锁场景的接受程度。
Int J Psychol. 2021 Aug;56(4):551-565. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12721. Epub 2020 Oct 28.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验