• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
[Resistance against preventive measures during the COVID-19 pandemic: causes and strategies for minimization].[新冠疫情期间对预防措施的抵制:原因及最小化策略]
Pravent Gesundh. 2022 Jun 20:1-7. doi: 10.1007/s11553-022-00960-2.
2
Communication to promote and support physical distancing for COVID-19 prevention and control.促进和支持预防和控制 COVID-19 的物理隔离的沟通。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Oct 9;10(10):CD015144. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015144.
3
Reactance as a Persuasive Strategy: How Health Communication Can Harness Anger to Leverage Behavior Change.反抗作为一种说服策略:健康传播如何利用愤怒来推动行为改变。
Health Commun. 2025 Jan 3:1-7. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2024.2446369.
4
Why Do Some Americans Resist COVID-19 Prevention Behavior? An Analysis of Issue Importance, Message Fatigue, and Reactance Regarding COVID-19 Messaging.为什么一些美国人抵制 COVID-19 预防行为?对 COVID-19 信息的问题重要性、信息疲劳和反应的分析。
Health Commun. 2022 Dec;37(14):1812-1819. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2021.1920717. Epub 2021 May 3.
5
Trust in science moderates the effects of high/low threat communication on psychological reactance to COVID-19-related public health messages.对科学的信任调节了高低威胁性信息对新冠疫情相关公共卫生信息的心理阻抗的影响。
J Commun Healthc. 2023 Dec;16(4):401-411. doi: 10.1080/17538068.2023.2279395. Epub 2023 Dec 14.
6
Communication Skills for Patient Engagement: Argumentation Competencies As Means to Prevent or Limit Reactance Arousal, with an Example from the Italian Healthcare System.患者参与的沟通技巧:论证能力作为预防或限制逆反心理激发的手段,以意大利医疗系统为例
Front Psychol. 2016 Sep 27;7:1472. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01472. eCollection 2016.
7
[Health professionals facing the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic: What are the mental health risks?].面对2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行的卫生专业人员:心理健康风险有哪些?
Encephale. 2020 Jun;46(3S):S73-S80. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2020.04.008. Epub 2020 Apr 22.
8
Promoting COVID-19 booster vaccines in Macao: A psychological reactance perspective.在澳门推广 COVID-19 加强疫苗:心理抗拒的视角。
Soc Sci Med. 2023 Sep;332:116128. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116128. Epub 2023 Jul 29.
9
Social Distance in COVID-19: Drawing the line between protective behavior and stigma manifestation.新冠疫情期间的社交距离:在保护行为和污名表现之间划清界限。
Psychiatriki. 2021 Sep 20;32(3):183-186. doi: 10.22365/jpsych.2021.025. Epub 2021 Aug 5.
10
Infection preventive behaviors and its association with perceived threat and perceived social factors during the COVID-19 pandemic in South Korea: 2020 community health survey.在韩国 COVID-19 大流行期间的感染预防行为及其与感知威胁和感知社会因素的关系:2020 年社区卫生调查。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Jul 19;22(1):1381. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13755-z.

本文引用的文献

1
Reactance, morality, and disgust: the relationship between affective dispositions and compliance with official health recommendations during the COVID-19 pandemic.反应力、道德和厌恶:在 COVID-19 大流行期间,情感倾向与遵守官方健康建议之间的关系。
Cogn Emot. 2022 Feb;36(1):120-136. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2021.1941783. Epub 2021 Jun 16.
2
Unwillingness to engage in behaviors that protect against COVID-19: the role of conspiracy beliefs, trust, and endorsement of complementary and alternative medicine.不愿意采取预防 COVID-19 的行为:阴谋论信念、信任和对补充和替代医学的认可的作用。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Apr 8;21(1):684. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10643-w.
3
Will COVID-19-related economic worries superimpose health worries, reducing nonpharmaceutical intervention acceptance in Germany? A prospective pre-registered study.新冠疫情相关的经济担忧是否会叠加健康担忧,从而降低德国民众对非药物干预措施的接受度?一项前瞻性预先注册研究。
Int J Psychol. 2021 Aug;56(4):607-622. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12753. Epub 2021 Mar 16.
4
From anxiety to action-Experience of threat, emotional states, reactance, and action preferences in the early days of COVID-19 self-isolation in Germany and Austria.从焦虑到行动——新冠疫情隔离早期德国和奥地利的威胁体验、情绪状态、反抗和行为偏好。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 8;15(12):e0243193. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243193. eCollection 2020.
5
Public acceptance of Covid-19 lockdown scenarios.公众对新冠疫情封锁场景的接受程度。
Int J Psychol. 2021 Aug;56(4):551-565. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12721. Epub 2020 Oct 28.
6
What motivates Chinese consumers to avoid information about the COVID-19 pandemic?: The perspective of the stimulus-organism-response model.是什么促使中国消费者回避新冠疫情信息?:刺激-机体-反应模型视角
Inf Process Manag. 2021 Jan;58(1):102407. doi: 10.1016/j.ipm.2020.102407. Epub 2020 Oct 6.

[新冠疫情期间对预防措施的抵制:原因及最小化策略]

[Resistance against preventive measures during the COVID-19 pandemic: causes and strategies for minimization].

作者信息

Hastall Matthias R, Scherenberg Viviane

机构信息

Fakultät Rehabilitationswissenschaften, Fachgebiet Qualitative Forschungsmethoden und strategische Kommunikation für Gesundheit, Inklusion und Teilhabe, Technische Universität Dortmund, Emil-Figge-Str. 50, 44227 Dortmund, Deutschland.

Fachbereich Public Health und Umweltgesundheit, APOLLON Hochschule der Gesundheitswirtschaft GmbH, Universitätsallee 18, 28359 Bremen, Deutschland.

出版信息

Pravent Gesundh. 2022 Jun 20:1-7. doi: 10.1007/s11553-022-00960-2.

DOI:10.1007/s11553-022-00960-2
PMID:40479337
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9208250/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, resistance against demonstrably effective preventive measures were frequently observed. Such "reactance," characterized by anger and negative cognitions, is experienced (according to psychological reactance theory) when a threat to subjectively important freedoms or attempts to change attitudes or behaviors is perceived.

OBJECTIVES

This paper discusses the role of defensive processes in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic from the perspective of an evidence-based and defense-sensitive risk and crisis communication. Triggers and influencing factors of defensive processes are discussed, as well as techniques for minimizing these unwanted reactions.

RESULTS

Defensive reactions should always be anticipated, at least to some extent, but can be reduced through a defense-sensitive communication design. This includes a professional presentation, a respectful and stigma-sensitive approach, positive and efficacy-bolstering information, and by avoiding emotionally overwhelming information such as strong negative emotional appeals or strong loss framings.

CONCLUSION

Communicators should be aware that defensive reactions can be triggered as well as minimized through certain features of risk communication. A consistent, clear, and tailored communication approach is needed to reduce uncertainties, defensiveness, and irritation.

摘要

背景

在2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行期间,经常观察到对明显有效的预防措施的抵触情绪。根据心理抵触理论,当主观上重要的自由受到威胁或试图改变态度或行为时,就会产生这种以愤怒和负面认知为特征的“抵触情绪”。

目的

本文从基于证据且对防御敏感的风险与危机沟通角度,探讨防御过程在COVID-19大流行背景下的作用。讨论了防御过程的触发因素和影响因素,以及将这些不良反应降至最低的技巧。

结果

防御反应至少在一定程度上总是可以预见的,但可以通过对防御敏感的沟通设计来减少。这包括专业的表述、尊重且对污名敏感的方法、积极且增强效能的信息,以及避免使用如强烈的负面情感诉求或强烈的损失框架等情感上压倒性的信息。

结论

沟通者应意识到,防御反应既可能被风险沟通的某些特征触发,也可以通过这些特征降至最低。需要一种一致、清晰且量身定制的沟通方法来减少不确定性、防御性和愤怒情绪。