World Trade Center Health Registry, Division of Epidemiology, New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, Queens, New York, USA.
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2022 Apr;16(2):698-705. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2020.465. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
The aim of this study was to use a mixed-method analysis to investigate the associations between qualitative themes found in written responses and quantitative reported level of stress after Hurricane Sandy.
A survey was conducted among World Trade Center Health Registry enrollees 5-12 mo after Hurricane Sandy. This study included 1202 participants who completed the free-response section and answered the question on how stressful their experiences were with Hurricane Sandy and its aftermath. Content analysis was used to generate qualitative data. Mixed-methods analysis was performed using a 1-way analysis of variance test for bivariate comparisons of qualitative thematic codes and the quantitative outcome of mean Sandy stress scores.
Seven themes emerged from the qualitative analysis. The themes of lack of information, negative emotional response, and financial stress had higher quantitative mean Sandy stress scores compared with other themes. The theme of patriotism/gratitude had an overall lower quantitative Sandy stress scores than other themes.
Qualitative and mixed-methods research on mental health outcomes after a disaster add new depth and findings to the existing literature. Using such methodologies to identify modifiable factors, such as improving communication during a disaster, may confer better mental health outcomes after a disaster.
本研究旨在采用混合方法分析,调查在桑迪飓风后书面回复中发现的定性主题与定量报告的应激水平之间的关联。
在桑迪飓风后 5-12 个月,对世界贸易中心健康登记处的参与者进行了一项调查。本研究包括 1202 名参与者,他们完成了自由回复部分,并回答了关于他们在桑迪飓风及其后果中的经历有多么紧张的问题。内容分析用于生成定性数据。采用单因素方差分析检验对定性主题代码和定量桑迪应激评分结果进行双变量比较,进行混合方法分析。
从定性分析中得出了 7 个主题。与其他主题相比,缺乏信息、负面情绪反应和财务压力这三个主题的定量桑迪应激评分更高。爱国主义/感激之情这一主题的定量桑迪应激评分总体低于其他主题。
对灾难后心理健康结果的定性和混合方法研究为现有文献增添了新的深度和发现。使用这种方法来确定可改变的因素,例如在灾难期间改善沟通,可能会在灾难后带来更好的心理健康结果。