Chen Haohui, Li Sai, Yi Min, Li Qiang, Zhu Xi, Yao Gaiqi, Ge Qinggang
Department of Critical Care Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China.
Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China. Corresponding author: Chen Haohui, Email:
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2021 Feb;33(2):233-236. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20201009-00659.
To investigate the perfection and improvement of the execution of integrative medicine therapy in severe tetanus therapy, to successfully control tetanus severe spasms, autonomic dysfunction and prevent lethal side-effect of prolong and high-dosage sedative-muscle-relaxant therapy, resulted in significant reduction of mortality of tetanus.
Symptoms, treatments and outcome of tetanus patients admitted to Peking University Third Hospital from 1965 to 2020 were reviewed. Patients were classified with Ablett classification. The cases of Ablett grade III and IV were severe tetanus. The patients were divided into two groups according to whether they were treated together with traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) simultaneously during the standard tetanus treatment; the patients in the TCM group were divided into the tetanus TCM medication group and the non tetanus TCM medication group according to the medicine provided whether was in accord with the conventional tetanus TCM prescriptions. The mortality of each group was calculated. In addition, one survived and one deceased case with severe convulsion, autonomic nerve dysfunction (Ablett grade IV) were selected, combined with the treatment methods and curative effects, the types, use methods and outcomes of Chinese and Western medicine were analyzed.
The 46 tetanus cases were treated with Western medicine. Twenty-two of them, TCM were applied. Fifteen of the 22 cases took the TCM prescription which was accord with the conventional tetanus prescription. The mortality of the 46 cases was 21.7% (10/46). The number of non-TCM group was 24 cases, with mortality of 20.8% (5/24); 1 case was Ablett II, 1 was Ablett III and 3 were Ablett IV. The number of the TCM group was 22 cases, with mortality of 22.7% (5/22), 2 cases were Ablett III, 3 were Ablett IV. The TCM prescription of these 5 deceased cases was not directed towards tetanus. The tetanus TCM medication group was 15 cases, with no mortality. Case analyses: case 1 was intubated because of severe spasms. Autonomic dysfunction occurred on the 8th day after admission. Esmolol with increasing the dosage of the sedatives and muscle relaxant, was not effective. Tetanus TCM was applied after 2 days of autonomic dysfunction happened. Autonomic dysfunction was then under controlled on the 2nd day post-TCM. She was recovery and discharged after 4 weeks. Case 2, also was intubated because of severe spasms. Autonomic dysfunction happened on the 3rd day after admission, and failed to be controlled by large-dose sedatives, muscle relaxant,and Esmolol. After 8 days of persistent autonomic dysfunction, tetanus TCM was applied and autonomic dysfunction was under controlled on the 2nd day post-TCM administration. Large dosage of muscle-relaxant was applied continuously. After 5 days' administration of TCM, the TCM was withdrew. One day after the withdrawal of TCM, respiratory and cardiac arrest happened because of the diffused bronchiole obstruction with pulmonary secretions loading.
Based on the precise and real-time diagnosis of the state of the disease, integrative medicine therapy with an overall analysis tetanus TCM prescription, is the key of declining tetanus mortality.
探讨中西医结合疗法在重症破伤风治疗中实施的完善与改进,以成功控制破伤风严重痉挛、自主神经功能障碍,并防止延长使用大剂量镇静 - 肌肉松弛剂治疗带来的致命副作用,从而显著降低破伤风死亡率。
回顾北京大学第三医院1965年至2020年收治的破伤风患者的症状、治疗方法及转归。采用阿布莱特(Ablett)分类法对患者进行分类。阿布莱特III级和IV级病例为重症破伤风。根据在标准破伤风治疗期间是否同时接受中医治疗将患者分为两组;中医组患者根据所提供药物是否符合传统破伤风中医方剂分为破伤风中医用药组和非破伤风中医用药组。计算每组的死亡率。此外,选取1例存活和1例死亡的伴有严重惊厥、自主神经功能障碍(阿布莱特IV级)的病例,结合治疗方法和疗效,分析中西医药物的种类、使用方法及效果。
46例破伤风患者接受西医治疗,其中22例应用了中医治疗。22例中有15例服用了符合传统破伤风方剂的中药。46例患者的死亡率为21.7%(10/46)。非中医组24例,死亡率为20.8%(5/24);1例为阿布莱特II级,1例为阿布莱特III级,3例为阿布莱特IV级。中医组22例,死亡率为22.7%(5/22),2例为阿布莱特III级;3例为阿布莱特IV级。这5例死亡病例的中药方剂并非针对破伤风。破伤风中医用药组15例,无死亡病例。病例分析:病例1因严重痉挛行气管插管。入院后第8天出现自主神经功能障碍。增加艾司洛尔剂量并联合使用镇静剂和肌肉松弛剂无效。自主神经功能障碍发生2天后应用破伤风中药。应用中药后第2天自主神经功能障碍得到控制。4周后康复出院。病例2也因严重痉挛行气管插管。入院后第3天出现自主神经功能障碍,大剂量镇静剂、肌肉松弛剂及艾司洛尔治疗无效。持续自主神经功能障碍8天后应用破伤风中药,应用中药后第2天自主神经功能障碍得到控制。持续应用大剂量肌肉松弛剂。应用中药5天后停用中药。停用中药1天后,因弥漫性细支气管阻塞伴肺分泌物潴留发生呼吸和心脏骤停。
基于对病情的精确实时诊断,采用综合分析的破伤风中医方剂进行中西医结合治疗,是降低破伤风死亡率的关键。