• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[海南省2311例关节炎症状患者莱姆病抗体的血清学研究]

[Serological study of Lyme disease antibody in 2 311 patients with arthritis symptoms in Hainan Province].

作者信息

He L F, Hou X X, Chen T, Zhang L, Wen S, Miao G Q, Xing M, Hao Q, Zhu X

机构信息

Department of Central Laboratory, People's Hospital of Sanya, Sanya 572000, China.

State Key Laboratory for Infectious Disease Prevention and Control, National Institute for Communicable Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 102206, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2021 Mar 6;55(3):379-385. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112150-20200527-00787.

DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn112150-20200527-00787
PMID:33730831
Abstract

To understand the infectious status of Lyme disease among patients with arthritis symptoms in Hainan Province, and to provide a theoretical basis for prevention and control of Lyme disease. From 2013 to 2018, sampling surveys had been conducted in medical institutions in 8 cities in Hainan Province(Haikou, Sanya, Danzhou, Dongfang, Wenchang, Qionghai, Qiongzhong, Wuzhishan), 2 311 patients serum samples were collected with arthritis symptoms, and descriptive research were conducted base on the collected clinical data. The Indirect Fluorescent-Antibody Test (IFA) method was used for preliminary screening of Lyme disease antibody, the Western Blot (WB) method was used for IFA positive samples confirmation. Statistical analysis using test. 2 311 serum samples were tested by IFA, and 166 were positive with the positive rate of 7.18%. Further confirmed by WB method, 62 samples were positive, the positive rate of Lyme disease antibody was 2.68%(62/2 311). The positive rate of Lyme disease antibody among patients with arthritis in different regions of Hainan was statistically significant (²40.636,<0.001), and the positive rate in Qiongzhong city was the highest (8.81%, 14/159). Danzhou's positive rate was the second highest, 5.62%(5/89). Dongfang city had the lowest positive rate (0.51%, 2/394). The positive rates of Lyme disease serum antibody in men and women were 2.79% (33/1 182) and 2.57% (29/1 129), respectively; the positive rates of antibodies between each age groups were in the range of 1.74% to 3.64%. The antibody positive rate of Lyme disease showed no significant difference between gender and age (²0.110,=0.740 ;²1.938,=0.747). Patients with arthritis symptoms caused by Borrelia burgdorferi infection were found in 8 cities in Hainan province, but the Lyme disease antibody positive rate was different among cities, with Qiongzhong County being the highest.

摘要

了解海南省关节炎症状患者中莱姆病的感染状况,为莱姆病的防控提供理论依据。2013年至2018年,对海南省8个市(海口、三亚、儋州、东方、文昌、琼海、琼中、五指山)的医疗机构进行抽样调查,收集2311例有关节炎症状患者的血清样本,并基于所收集的临床资料进行描述性研究。采用间接荧光抗体试验(IFA)方法对莱姆病抗体进行初步筛查,采用免疫印迹法(WB)对IFA阳性样本进行确认。采用检验进行统计分析。2311份血清样本经IFA检测,166份呈阳性,阳性率为7.18%。经WB法进一步确认,62份样本呈阳性,莱姆病抗体阳性率为2.68%(62/2311)。海南省不同地区关节炎患者莱姆病抗体阳性率差异有统计学意义(² = 40.636,<0.001),琼中市阳性率最高(8.81%,14/159)。儋州阳性率次之,为5.62%(5/89)。东方市阳性率最低(0.51%,2/394)。男性和女性莱姆病血清抗体阳性率分别为2.79%(33/1182)和2.57%(29/1129);各年龄组抗体阳性率在1.74%至3.64%之间。莱姆病抗体阳性率在性别和年龄之间差异无统计学意义(² = 0.110, = 0.740;² = 1.938, = 0.747)。在海南省8个市发现了由伯氏疏螺旋体感染引起关节炎症状的患者,但不同市之间莱姆病抗体阳性率不同,琼中县最高。

相似文献

1
[Serological study of Lyme disease antibody in 2 311 patients with arthritis symptoms in Hainan Province].[海南省2311例关节炎症状患者莱姆病抗体的血清学研究]
Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2021 Mar 6;55(3):379-385. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112150-20200527-00787.
2
Test of 259 serums from patients with arthritis or neurological symptoms confirmed existence of Lyme disease in Hainan province, China.对来自患有关节炎或神经症状患者的259份血清进行检测,证实中国海南省存在莱姆病。
Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015 Jun 15;8(6):9531-6. eCollection 2015.
3
A seroepidemiological investigation of Lyme disease in Qiongzhong County, Hainan Province in 2019-2020.2019-2020 年海南省琼中县莱姆病血清流行病学调查。
Ann Palliat Med. 2021 Apr;10(4):4721-4727. doi: 10.21037/apm-21-693.
4
Prevalence and prediction of Lyme disease in Hainan province.海南省莱姆病的流行状况及预测。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2021 Mar 18;15(3):e0009158. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009158. eCollection 2021 Mar.
5
[Comparable evaluation of serological diagnostic tests (ELISA, IFA and PA methods) for the detection of anti-Borrelia burgdorferi antibody].[用于检测抗伯氏疏螺旋体抗体的血清学诊断试验(ELISA、IFA和PA方法)的比较评估]
Rinsho Byori. 1992 Nov;40(11):1204-9.
6
Prevalence of antibody to Borrelia burgdorferi by indirect fluorescent antibody assay, ELISA, and western immunoblot in healthy adults in Wisconsin and Arizona.
J Infect Dis. 1992 Jun;165(6):1133-7. doi: 10.1093/infdis/165.6.1133.
7
Comparative evaluation of two enzyme linked immunosorbent assay methods and three Western Blot methods for the diagnosis of culture-confirmed early Lyme borreliosis in Italy.两种酶联免疫吸附测定方法和三种蛋白质印迹法用于诊断意大利培养确诊的早期莱姆病疏螺旋体病的比较评估
New Microbiol. 2005 Jan;28(1):37-43.
8
Spatial-temporal analysis of hepatitis E in Hainan Province, China (2013-2022): insights from four major hospitals.中国海南省戊型肝炎的时空分析(2013-2022):四大医院的见解。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jun 27;12:1381204. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1381204. eCollection 2024.
9
Early detection and persistence of antibodies to Borrelia burgdorferi in persons with Lyme disease.莱姆病患者中抗伯氏疏螺旋体抗体的早期检测及持续性
Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A. 1987 Feb;263(3):392-9. doi: 10.1016/s0176-6724(87)80098-6.
10
Dogs vaccinated with common Lyme disease vaccines do not respond to IR6, the conserved immunodominant region of the VlsE surface protein of Borrelia burgdorferi.用常见莱姆病疫苗接种的犬只对IR6无反应,IR6是伯氏疏螺旋体VlsE表面蛋白的保守免疫显性区域。
Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2004 May;11(3):458-62. doi: 10.1128/CDLI.11.3.458-462.2004.

引用本文的文献

1
Occupational Lyme Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.职业性莱姆病:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Jan 25;12(2):296. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12020296.